Original Communication
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2005) 59, 1233–1240. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602234; published online 13 July 2005
Variety scores of food groups contribute to the specific nutrient adequacy in Tehranian men
Guarantor: F Azizi.
Contributors: LA and PM designed the study, collected and analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. FA supervised the research.
L Azadbakht1, P Mirmiran1 and F Azizi1
1Endocrine Research Center, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Correspondence: F Azizi, Endocrine Research Center, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, PO Box: 19395-4763, Tehran, IR Iran. E-mail: Azizi@erc.ac.ir
Received 20 September 2004; Revised 25 May 2005; Accepted 8 June 2005; Published online 13 July 2005.
Abstract
Objective:
To examine the relationship between variety scores of food groups (between and within food groups) and the probability of nutrient adequacy in Tehranian men.
Design:
A cross-sectional study assessing food intake by two 24-h recall questionnaires. Dietary diversity was defined according to diet quality index revised, which was used by Haines et al in 1999. The mean probability of adequacy across 14 nutrients was calculated using the Dietary Reference Intakes.
Setting:
District 13 of Tehran, Iran.
Subjects:
A total of 295 males, aged 18 y and over.
Results:
Whole grain variety mostly correlated with protein and vitamin B2 (r=0.3, P<0.05). Fruit variety was correlated with vitamin C (r=0.4, P<0.05). Dairy variety was correlated with calcium intake (r=0.4, P<0.05). Meat variety was correlated with protein intake (r=0.3, P<0.05). Most subjects failed to meet vitamin B6, zinc, magnesium, calcium, copper, and vitamin B12 adequacy. Energy intake was a strong predictor of the mean probability of adequacy in models controlled for age, body mass index, education level and job status (model R2=0.48). Adding the number of servings from each of the food group to the models significantly improved the model fit (model R2=0.55). Adding the dietary variety improved the model fit significantly (model R2=0.61). Dairy variety and meat variety had the strongest association with improved nutrient adequacy.
Conclusion:
Variety of different food groups is a useful indicator of specific nutrient adequacy. Hence, to determine the adequacy of a specific nutrient, the variety scores of specific food groups should be taken into account.
Keywords:
nutrient adequacy, variety, food group, dietary diversity
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
