Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works NATURE.COM NATURE NEWS NATUREJOBS NATUREEVENTS ABOUT NPG
Help Nature.com site index  
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
SEARCH     advanced search my account e-alerts subscribe register
Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
For authors
For referees
Contact editorial office
About the journal
For librarians
Subscribe
Advertising
naturereprints
Contact NPG
Customer services
Site features
NPG Subject areas
Access material from all our publications in your subject area:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Cancer Cancer
Chemistry Chemistry
Dentistry Dentistry
Development Development
Drug Discovery Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology Evolution & Ecology
Genetics Genetics
Immunology Immunology
Materials Materials Science
Medical Research Medical Research
Microbiology Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience Neuroscience
Pharmacology Pharmacology
Physics Physics
Browse all publications
 
June 1998, Volume 52, Number 6, Pages 441-446
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Article  PDF
Original communication
The basal metabolic rate and energy cost of standardised walking of short and tall men
L Censi1,a, E Toti1, G Pastore1 and A Ferro-Luzzi1,2,a

1National Institute of Nutrition

2WHO Collaborating Centre for Nutrition, Rome, Italy

aCorrespondence: Prof A Ferro-Luzzi, Unit of Human Nutrition, National Institute of Nutrition, Via Ardeatina, 546, 00178, Rome, Italy.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the influence of stature on the basal metabolic rate (BMR) and on the energy cost of standardised walking. A second objective was assess the accuracy of the FAO/UNU/WHO (1985) equations to predict BMR.

Design/subjects: Forty-six young men were selected on the basis of their stature and assigned to the group of short, S (n=25, mean stature=1.65±0.03 m) or of tall, T (n=21, mean stature=1.87±0.04 m).

Setting: Rome, Italy.

Interventions: Body composition was assessed by underwater weighing. BMR and energy cost walking at 5 km/h was measured by the Douglas bag.

Results: Body fat % was similar in the two groups (15.2±4.3 for S; 17.4±5.3 for T; ns). The BMR of T was 20% higher than that of S, but 12% and 10% lower when standardised respectively for body weight (BW) and fat free mass (FFM). However these differences were removed when BMR was covaried for BW or FFM, or normalised by BW0.62 or FFM0.64. Measured BMR was 7% for T and 6% for S lower than that predicted by the equation; the inclusion of stature did not reduce the overestimation. The energy cost of walking was 27% higher in T than in S, but 9% and 5% lower when standardised respectively for BW and FFM. The differences disappeared when expressing the energy cost of walking as net cost per kg FFM.

Conclusions: Tall people have lower BMR per unit of BW or FFM than short people, and it is necessary to control for the diverse body mass by the appropriate method. However, qualitative differences in the composition of FFM are plausible, due to the diverse proportion of metabolically active internal organs in people of different height, which might be reflected in the higher BMR/kg FFM of the shorter subjects. The sex- and age-specific equation significantly overestimates the BMR of both short and tall people, but there is no simple explanation of this observation. The energy cost of walking is not affected by stature when expressed as net cost per kg FFM.

Sponsorship: National Research Council (CNR), Italy, Target Project 'Prevention and Control Disease Factors,' Subproject 'Nutrition' no. 94.00686 PF 41.

Keywords

basal metabolic rate; energy expenditure; stature; body size; body composition

Received 21 January 1998; revised 3 March 1998; accepted 14 March 1998
June 1998, Volume 52, Number 6, Pages 441-446
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Article  PDF
Privacy Policy © 1998 Nature Publishing Group