Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

Recurrent chromosomal aberrations in INK4a/ARF defective primary lymphomas predict drug responses in vivo

Abstract

Predicting responsiveness to anticancer therapy based on molecular findings at diagnosis is important to optimize treatment decisions. Although clinical outcome correlates with distinct mutations in some cancer entities, treatment responses within these lesion-stratified subgroups still remain heterogeneous, underscoring the need for additional prognosticators. We previously demonstrated that defined genetic defects at the INK4a/ARF locus, which encodes the tumor suppressors p16INK4a and ARF, not only accelerated lymphomagenesis in the Eμ-myc transgenic mouse but also interfered with treatment sensitivity. In this study, we take a nonbiased genome-wide approach to examine whether the responsiveness of these lymphomas can be further stratified based on cytogenetic information at diagnosis. Indeed, using spectral karyotyping, comparative genomic hybridization, and fluorescence in situ hybridization in 38 primary lymphomas, we find recurrent cytogenetic alterations that refine the predictive value of INK4a/ARF lesions on drug responses in vivo: gain of chromosome 14, which was never detected in INK4a/ARFnull lymphomas, defined an ARFnull subgroup with superior treatment outcome. Gain of chromosome 6 was identified as a recurrent chromosomal aberration that predisposed ARFnull tumors to their subsequent INK4a loss during therapy. These data illustrate how cytogenetic information from cancer specimens might complement established prognostic markers and may improve anticancer treatment strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams JM, Harris AW, Pinkert CA, Corcoran LM, Alexander WS, Cory S, Palmiter RD and Brinster RL . (1985). Nature, 318, 533–538.

  • Carter TL, Reaman GH and Kees UR . (2001a). Br. J. Haematol., 113, 323–328.

  • Carter TL, Watt PM, Kumar R, Burton PR, Reaman GH, Sather HN, Baker DL and Kees UR . (2001b). Blood, 97, 572–574.

  • Davisson MT (ed) (1996). Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl JA . (2002). Cancer Biol. Ther., 1, 226–231.

  • Dimri GP, Lee X, Basile G, Acosta M, Scott G, Roskelley C, Medrano EE, Linskens M, Rubelj I, Pereira-Smith O, Peacocke M and Campisi J . (1995). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 9363–9367.

  • Dohner H, Stilgenbauer S, Benner A, Leupolt E, Krober A, Bullinger L, Dohner K, Bentz M and Lichter P . (2000). N. Engl. J. Med., 343, 1910–1916.

  • Eischen CM, Alt JR and Wang P . (2004). Oncogene, 23, 8931–8940.

  • Eischen CM, Weber JD, Roussel MF, Sherr CJ and Cleveland JL . (1999). Genes Dev., 13, 2658–2669.

  • Haslinger C, Schweifer N, Stilgenbauer S, Dohner H, Lichter P, Kraut N, Stratowa C and Abseher R . (2004). J. Clin. Oncol., 22, 3937–3949.

  • Jacobs JJ, Scheijen B, Voncken JW, Kieboom K, Berns A and van Lohuizen M . (1999). Genes Dev., 13, 2678–2690.

  • Johnstone RW, Ruefli AA and Lowe SW . (2002). Cell, 108, 153–164.

  • Krimpenfort P, Quon KC, Mooi WJ, Loonstra A and Berns A . (2001). Nature, 413, 83–86.

  • Maloney KW, McGavran L, Odom LF and Hunger SP . (1999). Blood, 93, 2380–2385.

  • Moorman AV, Richards SM, Martineau M, Cheung KL, Robinson HM, Jalali GR, Broadfield ZJ, Harris RL, Taylor KE, Gibson BE, Hann IM, Hill FG, Kinsey SE, Eden TO, Mitchell CD and Harrison CJ . (2003). Blood, 102, 2756–2762.

  • Ruas M and Peters G . (1998). Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 1378, F115–F177.

  • Schmitt CA . (2003). Nat. Rev. Cancer, 3, 286–295.

  • Schmitt CA, Fridman JS, Yang M, Lee S, Baranov E, Hoffman RM and Lowe SW . (2002a). Cell, 109, 335–346.

  • Schmitt CA, McCurrach ME, de Stanchina E, Wallace-Brodeur RR and Lowe SW . (1999). Genes Dev., 13, 2670–2677.

  • Schmitt CA, Wallace-Brodeur RR, Rosenthal CT, McCurrach ME and Lowe SW . (2000). Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., LXV, 499–510.

  • Schmitt CA, Yang M, Fridman JS, Baranov E, Hoffman RM and Lowe SW . (2002b). Cancer Cell, 1, 289–298.

  • Schrock E, du Manoir S, Veldman T, Schoell B, Wienberg J, Ferguson-Smith MA, Ning Y, Ledbetter DH, Bar-Am I, Soenksen D, Garini Y and Ried T . (1996). Science, 273, 494–497.

  • Schrock E, Garini Y, Koehler M and Ried T . (1999). Spectral Karyotyping in Clinical and Tumor Cytogenetics. Springer: Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schrock E, Weaver Z and Albertson D . (2001). Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Human and Mouse Tumors using Chromosomes and Arrayed Locus Specific Probes as Targets. John Wiley and Sons: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpless NE, Bardeesy N, Lee KH, Carrasco D, Castrillon DH, Aguirre AJ, Wu EA, Horner JW and DePinho RA . (2001). Nature, 413, 86–91.

  • Shay JW and Roninson IB . (2004). Oncogene, 23, 2919–2933.

  • Telenius H, Pelmear AH, Tunnacliffe A, Carter NP, Behmel A, Ferguson-Smith MA, Nordenskjold M, Pfragner R and Ponder BA . (1992). Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 4, 257–263.

  • Wei G, Lonardo F, Ueda T, Kim T, Huvos AG, Healey JH and Ladanyi M . (1999). Int J Cancer, 80, 199–204.

  • Zindy F, Eischen CM, Randle DH, Kamijo T, Cleveland JL, Sherr CJ and Roussel MF . (1998). Genes Dev, 12, 2424–2433.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A Harris (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Australia), M Serrano (Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas, Spain), and CJ Sherr (St Jude Children's Research Hospital) for mice. This work was supported by research grants from the National Cancer Institute (CA87497) to SW Lowe, from the German Federal Ministry of Educations and Research (BioFuture Award) to A Helmrich and E Schrock, and from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Deutsche Krebshilfe to CA Schmitt. S Lee is a fellow of the German José Carreras Leukemia Foundation (reference number F02/03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clemens A Schmitt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helmrich, A., Lee, S., O'Brien, P. et al. Recurrent chromosomal aberrations in INK4a/ARF defective primary lymphomas predict drug responses in vivo. Oncogene 24, 4174–4182 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208600

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208600

Keywords

Search

Quick links