Abstract
Activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway may contribute to tumorigenesis. AKT mediates survival signals that protect cells from apoptosis and, thus, is a potentially important therapeutic target. To determine the frequency of AKT activation in human ovarian cancer, we screened a tumor tissue microarray with a phospho-specific pan-AKT (Ser473) antibody, which revealed elevated staining in 21 of 31 (68%) ovarian carcinomas. Phospho-AKT staining was associated with that of phospho (active)-mTOR in 27 of 31 (87%) ovarian tumors, with 17 (55%) tumors showing elevated phospho-mTOR positivity. We tested the effects of AKT/mTOR activation on the therapeutic sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells. Pretreatment of SKOV3 cells, which exhibit constitutive AKT activity under low serum conditions, with the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 augmented cisplatin-induced apoptosis. In contrast, ovarian cancer cell lines OVCAR4 and OVCAR5, which have low basal levels of AKT activity, did not show increased cisplatin-induced apoptosis when pretreated with LY294002. In addition, inhibition of mTOR activity with rapamycin resulted in G1 arrest in SKOV3 cells, but not in OVCAR4 or OVCAR5 cells. Collectively, these findings indicate that active AKT and downstream mTOR represent potentially important therapeutic and/or chemopreventive targets in ovarian cancer.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 50 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $5.18 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altomare DA, Tanno S, De Rienzo A, Klein-Szanto AJ, Tanno S, Skele KS, Hoffman JP and Testa JR . (2002). J. Cell Biochem., 87, 470–476.
Arboleda MJ, Lyons JF, Kabbinavar FF, Bray MR, Snow BE, Ayala R, Danino M, Karlan BY and Slamon DJ . (2003). Cancer Res., 63, 196–206.
Brognard J, Clark AS, Ni Y and Dennis PA . (2001). Cancer Res., 61, 3986–3997.
Cantley LC . (2002). Science, 296, 1655–1657.
Dhawan P, Singh AB, Ellis DL and Richmond A . (2002). Cancer Res., 62, 7335–7342.
Gupta AK, McKenna WG, Weber CN, Feldman MD, Goldsmith JD, Mick R, Machtay M, Rosenthal DI, Bakanauskas VJ, Cerniglia GJ, Bernhard EJ, Weber RS and Muschel RJ . (2002). Clin. Cancer Res., 8, 885–892.
Hu L, Hofmann J, Lu Y, Mills GB and Jaffe RB . (2002). Cancer Res., 62, 1087–1092.
Nakatani K, Thompson DA, Barthel A, Sakaue H, Liu W, Weigel RJ and Roth RA . (1999). J. Biol. Chem., 274, 21528–21532.
Neshat MS, Mellinghoff IK, Tran C, Stiles B, Thomas G, Petersen R, Frost P, Gibbons JJ, Wu H and Sawyers CL . (2001). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 10031–10033.
Page C, Lin HJ, Jin Y, Castle VP, Nunez G, Huang M and Lin J . (2000). Anticancer Res., 20, 407–416.
Podsypanina K, Lee RT, Politis C, Hennessy I, Crane A, Puc J, Neshat M, Wang H, Yang L, Gibbons J, Frost P, Dreisbach V, Blenis J, Gaciong Z, Fisher P, Sawyers C, Hedrick-Ellenson L and Parsons R . (2001). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 10320–10325.
Pullen N and Thomas G . (1997). FEBS Lett., 410, 78–82.
Shayesteh L, Lu Y, Kuo WL, Baldocchi R, Godfrey T, Collins C, Pinkel D, Powell B, Mills GB and Gray JW . (1999). Nat. Genet., 21, 99–102.
Sonenberg N and Gingras AC . (1998). Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol., 10, 268–275.
Sun M, Wang G, Paciga JE, Feldman RI, Yuan ZQ, Ma XL, Shelley SA, Jove R, Tsichlis PN, Nicosia SV and Cheng JQ . (2001). Am. J. Pathol., 159, 431–437.
Testa JR and Bellacosa A . (2001). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 10983–10985.
Yuan ZQ, Sun M, Feldman RI, Wang G, Ma X, Jiang C, Coppola D, Nicosia SV and Cheng JQ . (2000). Oncogene, 19, 2324–2330.
West KA, Sianna Castillo S and Dennis PA . (2002). Drug Resist Update, 5, 234–248.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Cancer Institute Grants CA83638 (SPORE in Ovarian Cancer), CA77429, and CA06927, and by an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The following Fox Chase Cancer Center/Ovarian SPORE shared facilities were used in the course of this work: Cell Culture Facility, Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting Facility, Biosample and Tissue Procurement Core, Biostatistics Facility and Histopathology Facility. HQ Wang is supported by a Board of Director's Postdoctoral Fellowship and by an NIH Institutional Training Grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Altomare, D., Wang, H., Skele, K. et al. AKT and mTOR phosphorylation is frequently detected in ovarian cancer and can be targeted to disrupt ovarian tumor cell growth. Oncogene 23, 5853–5857 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207721
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207721
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Stereochemical engineering yields a multifunctional peptide macrocycle inhibitor of Akt2 by fine-tuning macrocycle-cell membrane interactions
Communications Chemistry (2023)
-
Current Update on Nanotechnology-Based Approaches in Ovarian Cancer Therapy
Reproductive Sciences (2023)
-
Ryanodine receptor 1-mediated Ca2+ signaling and mitochondrial reprogramming modulate uterine serous cancer malignant phenotypes
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2022)
-
eIF3a regulation of mTOR signaling and translational control via HuR in cellular response to DNA damage
Oncogene (2022)
-
A phase I study of AZD2171 and Temsirolimus in patients with advanced gynecological malignancies
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (2022)