Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Report
  • Published:

AKT and mTOR phosphorylation is frequently detected in ovarian cancer and can be targeted to disrupt ovarian tumor cell growth

Abstract

Activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway may contribute to tumorigenesis. AKT mediates survival signals that protect cells from apoptosis and, thus, is a potentially important therapeutic target. To determine the frequency of AKT activation in human ovarian cancer, we screened a tumor tissue microarray with a phospho-specific pan-AKT (Ser473) antibody, which revealed elevated staining in 21 of 31 (68%) ovarian carcinomas. Phospho-AKT staining was associated with that of phospho (active)-mTOR in 27 of 31 (87%) ovarian tumors, with 17 (55%) tumors showing elevated phospho-mTOR positivity. We tested the effects of AKT/mTOR activation on the therapeutic sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells. Pretreatment of SKOV3 cells, which exhibit constitutive AKT activity under low serum conditions, with the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 augmented cisplatin-induced apoptosis. In contrast, ovarian cancer cell lines OVCAR4 and OVCAR5, which have low basal levels of AKT activity, did not show increased cisplatin-induced apoptosis when pretreated with LY294002. In addition, inhibition of mTOR activity with rapamycin resulted in G1 arrest in SKOV3 cells, but not in OVCAR4 or OVCAR5 cells. Collectively, these findings indicate that active AKT and downstream mTOR represent potentially important therapeutic and/or chemopreventive targets in ovarian cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altomare DA, Tanno S, De Rienzo A, Klein-Szanto AJ, Tanno S, Skele KS, Hoffman JP and Testa JR . (2002). J. Cell Biochem., 87, 470–476.

  • Arboleda MJ, Lyons JF, Kabbinavar FF, Bray MR, Snow BE, Ayala R, Danino M, Karlan BY and Slamon DJ . (2003). Cancer Res., 63, 196–206.

  • Brognard J, Clark AS, Ni Y and Dennis PA . (2001). Cancer Res., 61, 3986–3997.

  • Cantley LC . (2002). Science, 296, 1655–1657.

  • Dhawan P, Singh AB, Ellis DL and Richmond A . (2002). Cancer Res., 62, 7335–7342.

  • Gupta AK, McKenna WG, Weber CN, Feldman MD, Goldsmith JD, Mick R, Machtay M, Rosenthal DI, Bakanauskas VJ, Cerniglia GJ, Bernhard EJ, Weber RS and Muschel RJ . (2002). Clin. Cancer Res., 8, 885–892.

  • Hu L, Hofmann J, Lu Y, Mills GB and Jaffe RB . (2002). Cancer Res., 62, 1087–1092.

  • Nakatani K, Thompson DA, Barthel A, Sakaue H, Liu W, Weigel RJ and Roth RA . (1999). J. Biol. Chem., 274, 21528–21532.

  • Neshat MS, Mellinghoff IK, Tran C, Stiles B, Thomas G, Petersen R, Frost P, Gibbons JJ, Wu H and Sawyers CL . (2001). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 10031–10033.

  • Page C, Lin HJ, Jin Y, Castle VP, Nunez G, Huang M and Lin J . (2000). Anticancer Res., 20, 407–416.

  • Podsypanina K, Lee RT, Politis C, Hennessy I, Crane A, Puc J, Neshat M, Wang H, Yang L, Gibbons J, Frost P, Dreisbach V, Blenis J, Gaciong Z, Fisher P, Sawyers C, Hedrick-Ellenson L and Parsons R . (2001). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 10320–10325.

  • Pullen N and Thomas G . (1997). FEBS Lett., 410, 78–82.

  • Shayesteh L, Lu Y, Kuo WL, Baldocchi R, Godfrey T, Collins C, Pinkel D, Powell B, Mills GB and Gray JW . (1999). Nat. Genet., 21, 99–102.

  • Sonenberg N and Gingras AC . (1998). Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol., 10, 268–275.

  • Sun M, Wang G, Paciga JE, Feldman RI, Yuan ZQ, Ma XL, Shelley SA, Jove R, Tsichlis PN, Nicosia SV and Cheng JQ . (2001). Am. J. Pathol., 159, 431–437.

  • Testa JR and Bellacosa A . (2001). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 10983–10985.

  • Yuan ZQ, Sun M, Feldman RI, Wang G, Ma X, Jiang C, Coppola D, Nicosia SV and Cheng JQ . (2000). Oncogene, 19, 2324–2330.

  • West KA, Sianna Castillo S and Dennis PA . (2002). Drug Resist Update, 5, 234–248.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Cancer Institute Grants CA83638 (SPORE in Ovarian Cancer), CA77429, and CA06927, and by an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The following Fox Chase Cancer Center/Ovarian SPORE shared facilities were used in the course of this work: Cell Culture Facility, Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting Facility, Biosample and Tissue Procurement Core, Biostatistics Facility and Histopathology Facility. HQ Wang is supported by a Board of Director's Postdoctoral Fellowship and by an NIH Institutional Training Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph R Testa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Altomare, D., Wang, H., Skele, K. et al. AKT and mTOR phosphorylation is frequently detected in ovarian cancer and can be targeted to disrupt ovarian tumor cell growth. Oncogene 23, 5853–5857 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207721

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207721

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links