Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

BMI-based body size guides for women and men: development and validation of a novel pictorial method to assess weight-related concepts

Abstract

Objectives:

To develop and evaluate two BMI-based instruments to determine perceptions of weight status, particularly perceptions of overweight and obesity, using pictorial images of women and men.

Methods:

Pictures of adults with known BMI values were used to construct gender-specific body size guides (BSGs) containing 10 bodies that ranged from underweight to class III obesity. Figures were standardized and a composite face was added to each. The BSGs were administered to 400 adults to assess the psychometric properties of the instruments and weight perceptions.

Results:

High correlations between the BMIs of respondents and the BMIs of the current body selected by respondents provided strong support for the criterion-related validity of the BSGs, and the logical pattern of responses to items assessing perception of weight categories supported construct validity for the scales. Test–retest reliability, assessed by correlations for both current and ideal body, was also high, despite the lengthy 6-month testing interval. Respondents' perceptions of the bodies within specific weight categories indicated that a majority failed to recognize the overweight female as overweight and perceived the overweight male as normal weight. Obese bodies were generally unrecognized as such until the bodies reached the higher levels of obesity (that is, BMI values >39). Perception of weight was influenced by the respondents' weight status and gender.

Conclusions:

Psychometric analyses indicated the BSGs are valid and reliable instruments. These results, coupled with the face validity of the scales and the relationship between the bodies and BMI values, indicate the BSGs offer advantages over existing instruments for researchers of weight perception and body image. Administration of the scales to an adult sample confirmed that overweight and obesity are under-recognized. Increased efforts to improve public understanding of these terms are needed and the BSGs may provide useful tools for this purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Purchase on Springer Link

Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000; 894: i–xii, 1–253.

  2. Mokdad AH, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, Bowman BA, Marks JS, Koplan JP . The spread of the obesity epidemic in the United States, 1991–1998. J Am Med Assoc 1999; 282: 1519–1522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent and Decrease Overweight Obesity. US Dept HHS/Public Health Service/Office of Surgeon General: Washington, DC, 2001, pp v–60.

  4. Kuchler F, Variyam JN . Mistakes were made: misperception as a barrier to reducing overweight. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003; 27: 856–861.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paeratakul S, White MA, Williamson DA, Ryan DH, Bray GA . Sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and BMI in relation to self-perception of overweight. Obes Res 2002; 10: 345–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang VW, Christakis NA . Extent and determinants of discrepancy between self-evaluations of weight status and clinical standards. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16: 538–543.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Strauss RS . Self-reported weight status and dieting in a cross-sectional sample of young adolescents: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999; 153: 741–747.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson D, McDonald G, Mannix J, Faga P, Firtko A . Mothers' perceptions of overweight and obesity in their children. Aust J Adv Nurs 2005; 23: 8–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maynard LM, Galuska DA, Blanck HM, Serdula MK . Maternal perceptions of weight status of children. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 1226–1231.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boutelle K, Fulkerson JA, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M . Mothers' perceptions of their adolescents' weight status: are they accurate? Obes Res 2004; 12: 1754–1757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Perrin EM, Flower KB, Ammerman AS . Pediatricians' own weight: self-perception, misclassification, and ease of counseling. Obes Res 2005; 13: 326–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Caccamese SM, Kolodner K, Wright SM . Comparing patient and physician perception of weight status with body mass index. Am J Med 2002; 112: 662–666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cleator J, Richman E, Leong KS, Mawdsley L, White S, Wilding J . Obesity: under-diagnosed and under-treated in hospital outpatient departments. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 581–584.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lemay CA, Cashman S, Savageau J, Fletcher K, Kinney R, Long-Middleton E . Underdiagnosis of obesity at a community health center. J Am Board Fam Pract 2003; 16: 14–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sciamanna CN, Tate DF, Lang W, Wing RR . Who reports receiving advice to lose weight? Results from a multistate survey. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 2334–2339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamilton JL, James FW, Bazargan M . Provider practice, overweight and associated risk variables among children from a multi-ethnic underserved community. J Natl Med Assoc 2003; 95: 441–448.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuchler F, Lin BH . The influence of individual choices and attitudes on adiposity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 1017–1022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stunkard AJ, Sorensen T, Schulsinger F . Use of the Danish adoption register for the study of obesity and thinness. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis 1983; 60: 115–120.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Collins EM . Body figure perceptions and preferences among preadolescent children. Int J Eat Disord 1991; 10: 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sherman DK, Iacono WG, Donnelly JM . Development and validation of body rating scales for adolescent females. Int J Eat Disord 1995; 18: 327–333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Patt MR, Lane AE, Finney CP, Yanek LR, Becker DM . Body image assessment: comparison of figure rating scales among urban black women. Ethn Dis 2002; 12: 54–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Williamson DA, Davis CJ, Bennett SM, Goreczny AJ, Gleaves DH . Development of a simple procedure for assessing body image disturbances. Behav Assess 1989; 11: 433–446.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bulik CM, Wade TD, Heath AC, Martin NG, Stunkard AJ, Eaves LJ . Relating body mass index to figural stimuli: population-based normative data for Caucasians. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25: 1517–1524.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Holdsworth M, Gartner A, Landais E, Maire B, Delpeuch F . Perceptions of healthy and desirable body size in urban Senegalese women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004; 28: 1561–1568.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thompson MA, Gray JJ . Development and validation of a new body-image assessment scale. J Pers Assess 1995; 64: 258–269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stunkard A . Old and new scales for the assessment of body image. Percept Mot Skills 2000; 90: 930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Rachel Yeater and Julie Olexa for their assistance in conducting this research, and Carol Grimes for her work on the development of the BSG images. This research was supported in part by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Grant no. H75/CCH322130-01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C V Harris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, C., Bradlyn, A., Coffman, J. et al. BMI-based body size guides for women and men: development and validation of a novel pictorial method to assess weight-related concepts. Int J Obes 32, 336–342 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803704

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803704

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links