Abstract
The parasitoid Cotesia glomerata usually produces female-biased sex ratios in the field, which are presumably caused by inbreeding and local mate competition (LMC); yet, sibling mating increases the production of males, leading to the male-biased sex ratio of broods in the laboratory. Previous studies have suggested that the sex allocation strategy of C. glomerata is based on both partial LMC in males and inbreeding avoidance in females. The current study investigated the presence of single-locus complementary sex determination (sl-CSD) as a sex-determining mechanism in this species through inbreeding experiment, cytological examination and microsatellite analysis. Cytological examination detected diploid males in nine of 17 single pairs of sibling mating, thus in agreement with the proportion of matched matings predicted by the sl-CSD model. Sex ratio shifts in these matched sibling matings were consistent with the sl-CSD model with less viable diploid males. The haploid males have a single set of maternal chromosomes (n=10), whereas diploid males possess a double set of chromosomes (2n=20). Microsatellite analyses confirmed that diploid males produced from the matched matings inherited segregating genetic materials from both parents. Thus, this study provides the first solid evidence for the presence of sl-CSD as a sex-determining mechanism in the braconid genus Cotesia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The basic system of sex determination in Hymenoptera is arrhenotokous haplodiplody, in which females are diploid, developed from fertilised eggs, whereas males are normally haploid, developed from unfertilized eggs (Crozier, 1977). Increasing evidence suggests that hymenopteran insects have evolved different sex determination mechanisms owing to the diverse mating systems and complex life history patterns in different species (Cook and Crozier, 1995; Butcher et al, 2000b). There are four different models that have been proposed to interpret the mechanisms of sex determination in this order, which are complementary sex determination (CSD) including single-locus CSD (sl-CSD) (Whiting, 1943) and multi-locus CSD (ml-CSD) (Crozier, 1971), genomic imprinting (Beukeboom, 1995) and genic balance (Bridges, 1925; Kerr and Nielsen, 1967).
The sl-CSD is the best known and empirically supported model under which sex is determined by multiple alleles at a single locus; diploid individuals that are heterozygous at the sex locus develop into females, whereas individuals that are hemizygous (haploid) or homozygous (diploid) at the sex locus develop into males (Whiting, 1943). In Hymenoptera, sl-CSD has been found in at least 20 nonsocial and two social species (Cook, 1993; Butcher et al, 2000a; Beukeboom, 2001; Salin et al, 2004; Stahlhut and Cowan, 2004). The molecular basis of sl-CSD has been revealed in the honeybee, Apis mellifera, in which heterozygotes at the sex-determination locus develop into females and homozygotes or hemizygotes into males (Beye et al, 2003). Although genomic imprinting has been found to be a genetic system of sex determination in Nasonia vitripennis (Dobson and Tanouye, 1998), ample evidence suggests that sl-CSD is the most plausible and widespread genetic system of sex determination in Hymenoptera (Crozier, 1971; Cook and Crozier, 1995; Paxton et al, 2000), hence leading to the suggestion that CSD might be an ancestral sex-determining mode in this insect order (Bull, 1981).
In the species with sl-CSD, inbreeding will greatly increase the frequency of matched matings (ie the parents share an allele at the sex locus) (Adams et al, 1977) and hence, the production of diploid males. However, the presence of diploid males is also explained genetically by ml-CSD, under which diploid males develop only from those individuals homozygous at all sex-determining loci (Crozier, 1971). Moreover, uniparental diploid males can occasionally occur in some species, such as N. vitripennis, through noncomplementary mechanisms (Whiting, 1960; Stille and Dävring, 1980; Dobson and Tanouye, 1998). Indeed, the number of both social and nonsocial species of Hymenoptera in which diploid males have been detected is much larger than the cases where sl-CSD has been considered to be the sex-determining mechanism (van Wilgenburg et al, 2006). Therefore, sl-CSD will not be unequivocally confirmed in any species until sex ratio shifts are quantified in inbreeding experiments, as well as the male diploidy is verified through cytological and/or molecular methods.
The genus Cotesia, belonging to the family of Braconidae, includes nearly 1000 species worldwide (Michel-Salzat and Whitfield, 2004). Many of these species, including C. congregata, C. kariyai, C. rubecula and C. glomerata, are frequently used as biological control agents in agricultural pest management because they are important parasitoids of numerous herbivorous insects (Michel-Salzat and Whitfield, 2004). The empirical studies that have been pursued with three species do not support the presence of sl-CSD as a sex-determining mechanism in this genus (Stouthamer et al, 1992; Niyibigira et al, 2004a, 2004b).
Cotesia glomerata (L.) (Syn. Cotesia or Apanteles glomeratus) is a gregarious larval endoparasitoid of the small and large white butterflies, Pieris brassicae L. and P. rapae L. (Liang and Levin, 1982). It has also been employed as a model in basic studies on the physiology (Ockroy et al, 2002), chemical ecology (Mattiacci et al, 2001), behavioural ecology (Gu and Dorn, 2003; Gu et al, 2003) and genetics (Gu and Dorn, 2000; Wang et al, 2003, 2004) of parasitoids. The population of C. glomerata wasps generally has female-biased sex ratios in the field, which is often thought to be linked with inbreeding and local mate competition (LMC) (Hardy, 1994). However, previous inbreeding experiments have demonstrated that full-sib mating causes a dramatic increase in the production of males, suggesting the presence of sl-CSD as a sex-determining mechanism in this species (Gu and Dorn, 2003). This hypothesis was supported by the observation of inbreeding avoidance behaviour in C. glomerata (Gu and Dorn, 2003), as the species with sl-CSD are expected to avoid inbreeding, thereby to minimize chances of diploid male production (Whiting, 1945; Crozier, 1971; Bull, 1981; Cook and Crozier, 1995). The current study was conducted to investigate the presence of sl-CSD in this braconid species through inbreeding experiment, microsatellite analysis and cytological examination.
Materials and methods
Experimental parasitoids
C. glomerata was collected from a field population in Switzerland in summer 2004, using the same method as described previously (Gu et al, 2003). Potted cabbage plants infested with newly hatched P. brassicae larvae were randomly distributed in a cabbage field at Feldi, Canton Zurich (47°34′N, 8°48E′). After 2 days of exposure to parasitoids, these potted plants were retrieved from the field, and the recovered host larvae were reared on cabbage leaves in insect cages (30 × 30 × 30 cm) at 22±1°C, 60% RH, under a 16:8 h light:dark cycle. After pupation, cocoon clusters of C. glomerata were individually collected and stored in glass vials (6 × 3 cm) according to their hosts. The female wasp of C. glomerata usually deposits 20–60 eggs once into the host (Liang and Levin, 1982). Previous experiments have also demonstrated that single oviposition of the female wasp on P. brassicae larvae do not produce any brood size larger than 62 (Gu et al, 2003). Therefore, the field-collected cocoon clusters sized less than 40 were selected for this study in order to minimize the chance of nonsiblings emerged from a brood. Virgin male and female wasps were obtained by separating individual cocoons from their clusters and allowing them to emerge singly in plastic vials (4 × 2 cm), with the brood noted. Such virgin wasps were used in the following experiment.
Inbreeding experiment
In total, 20 single pairs of full-sibling mating were established using the virgin males and females. We placed one female and one male wasp, both newly emerged from the same brood, into a vial (4 × 2 cm). After 2 days, the male wasp was transferred from the vial into a prelabelled Eppendorf tube and stored at −80°C, whereas the female wasp was transferred into an insect cage, where 20–25 P. brassicae larvae were provided for parasitism. To reduce superparasitism (Gu et al, 2003), the female wasp was removed from the cage 24 h later and frozen in a prelabelled Eppendorf tube at −80°C. The parasitized host larvae were reared on cabbage leaves until the parasitoids egressed and pupated. Parasitoid cocoon clusters were collected and individually kept in vials with their motherhood noted. When emergence of adult wasps from a brood was completed, female and male numbers were counted to calculate the sex ratio, and the unemerged cocoons were checked to estimate the brood size and pupa mortality. After counting, some males from each brood were used for cytological examination, whereas the remaining male wasps were stored at −80°C for microsatellite analysis. Among the 20 sibling mating pairs, three produced only male progeny, probably owing to unsuccessful mating; these pairs, as well as their progeny, were not used in microsatellite analysis and cytological examination.
Microsatellite analysis
In all, 17 of the 20 single pairs of parents, which produced both female and male progeny, were genotyped at five microsatellite loci, including Cot1 (GenBank accession number AY804182), Cot2 (AY804183), Cot3 (AY804184), Cot4 (AY804185) and Cot5 (AY804186). These codominant microsatellite markers were also used to detect heterozygous bi-parental diploid males in the F1 progeny derived from these pairs of parents. Microsatellite development, DNA isolation and DNA genotyping were carried out as described by Zhou et al (2005). PCR amplified microsatellite alleles were separated on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel using a Sequi-Gen GT sequencing apparatus (Bio-Rad, Reinach, Switzerland), then visualized by silver staining (Creste et al, 2001). Gel patterns were scanned using a UMAX Powerlook 1100 Firewire scanner.
Among the five microsatellites tested, Cot1 was highly polymorphic (eight alleles were detected) and informative in the sib-mated pairs tested. In comparison, polymorphic level was much lower at Cot2, Cot3, Cot4 and Cot5 (one to four alleles were detected). Microsatellite analyses of the 17 pairs of parents showed uninformative results at these loci because an allele was shared by mating partners. Consequently, only Cot 1 was used to genotype the sons of the informative parents. As controls, two daughters in each of the sibships were randomly selected and genotyped to check their bi-parental heterozygosity at this locus. Sons were classified as bi-parental diploids if they carried both maternal and paternal alleles.
Cytological examination
Preliminary studies using cerebral ganglia and testes as materials were conducted to select a suitable tissue for chromosome preparation in males. The results showed that testes had a much higher amount of spermatocytes in active division, as compared with cerebral ganglia, and colchicines treatment (>1 h) greatly increased the yields of high-quality metaphases. Therefore, testes were used for the metaphase spread.
Testes of newly emerged males were dissected out in colchicines–hypotonic solution (0.05% colchicine in 0.075 M potassium chloride solution) on a cavity slide, then transferred into fresh colchicines–hypotonic solution and incubated at room temperature for at least 1 h. Chromosome preparations were made using the air-drying technique modified from Imai et al (1977). After air-drying overnight, the preparations were stained for 10 min in freshly prepared Giemsa solution (Fluka product diluted 1:20 in 1/15 M, pH 6.8 phosphate buffer: KH2PO4 4.54 g/l, Na2HPO4 4.75 g/l). Chromosomes were observed under a Zeiss Axioplan 2 Imaging microscope, coupled with Axiocam digital camera and AxioVision software (version 2.0.5; Zeiss).
Statistical analysis
To compare sex ratio and brood size between matched and unmatched matings, data were first checked for normality using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, and the homogeneity of variances using Levene's test. Accordingly, Student's t-test was applied in data analyses. Similar methods were used to compare the mortality of pupae in matched and unmatched matings. Deviations of the observed matched matings from the expected values under sl-CSD and ml-CSD models were analysed using χ2 goodness of fit test (Zar, 1999). All analyses were performed using SPSS 11 for Macintosh.
Results
Microsatellite analysis
In five of the 17 single pairs of sibling mating, distinct alleles were shown between mother and father at locus Cot1. For the remaining 12 parental pairs, three showed ambiguous genotypes (more than two bands were presented in females), and other pairs carried shared alleles at the locus. Therefore, only sons of the five informative parent pairs were subjected to further genotyping analyses.
A total of 159 sons were randomly selected from the five sibships for genotyping at locus Cot1. Among them, five diploid males were detected in sibship 1 (n=48) and three diploid males were found in sibship 2 (n=39); no heterozygous male was detected in the remaining three sibships. Examples of the microsatellite genotypes were shown in Figure 1. One diploid male (lane 2) in sibship 1 inherited one allele (257 bp) from its father (lane 3) and another allele (278 bp) from its mother (lane 4). Similarly, one diploid male (lane 8) in sibship 2 carried two distinct alleles with 266 bp from its mother (lane 5) and 305 bp from its father (lane 6). The same heterozygous pattern was also presented in its sister (lane 7), showing the bi-parental nature of diploids at this locus. In contrast, the haploid males shown in lanes 1 and 9 only carried one allele from their mothers. Thus, it is clear that the diploid males of C. glomerata developed from fertilized eggs and inherited the genetic materials from both parents.
Cytological examination
Metaphase pictures clearly show that haploid males in C. glomerata have 10 maternal chromosomes (n=10) (Figure 2a) and the diploid males possess a double set of chromosomes (2n=20) (Figure 2b).
Cytological examination detected diploid males in nine of the 17 examined pairs of sibling mating (Table 2), suggesting that these matings are matched. This result is well in agreement with the prediction of sl-CSD model (goodness of fit test; χ2=0.059, P>0.05). According to the ml-CSD model, the chance that a matched mating occurs in brother–sister crosses is (0.5)k if there are k sex loci in the species (Cook and Crozier, 1995). Thus, under two-locus ml-CSD, the chance of matched mating should be less than 25%, which is significantly different from the observed data (goodness of fit test; χ2=7.078, P<0.05). In this context, the chance would be even smaller when more sex loci were involved. Therefore, the presence of ml-CSD in C. glomerata is ruled out.
Under sl-CSD, 50% of the fertilized (diploid) progeny are expected to develop into diploid males in the nine matched matings, and thus the ratio of diploid males to females in siblings should be approximately equal. However, the calculated ratio of diploid males to females, based on unambiguously determined diploid and haploid males from these matched matings, ranged from 0.083 to 0.667, with an average of 0.260. Indeed, even the ratio of diploid males to females calculated by considering those undetermined males as diploids was lower than the prediction of sl-CSD model in seven of the nine matched matings (Table 1). As compared to the eight unmatched matings, the nine matched matings had significantly higher sex ratios (the proportion of males) (t-test, P<0.05) (Table 2). On the other hand, the mean brood size was significantly smaller in the matched matings than in the unmatched matings (t-test, P<0.05), although no significant differences were shown in pupa mortality between the matched and unmatched matings (t-test, P=0.57) (Table 2). These results indicate that diploid males produced from the matched matings of C. glomerata have suffered a relatively higher mortality in a pre-pupa stage, relative to diploid females.
Discussion
Cytological examinations have physically identified diploid males from sibling matings, and furthermore, microsatellite analyses have revealed that such diploid males inherit segregating genetic materials from both parents. Thus, empirical evidence is sufficient to rule out the possibility of non-CSD mechanisms. The males used in our microsatellite analyses and cytological examinations were derived from single-pair sibling matings, so that these findings truly reflect the bi-parental nature of the diploid males produced as such. The quantitative analysis of the cytological data obtained from the single-pair sibling matings has shown that sex ratio shifts in the matched matings are consistent with sl-CSD model rather than any ml-CSD model. As our breeding experiments started directly with a large sample of field-collected cocoon clusters, the presence of sl-CSD in C. glomerata unlikely result from the collapse of a ml-CSD system owing to a bottleneck effect. Therefore, this study provides solid evidence to support our previous hypothesis that sl-CSD functions as a sex determining mechanism in this braconid species (Gu and Dorn, 2003).
So far, the presence of sl-CSD has not been found in the braconid genus Cotesia. Although diploid males were recorded in C. rubecula, no experimental data are available to support the presence of sl-CSD in this solitary species (Stouthamer et al, 1992). Modelling analyses for the field populations shows no evidence for the presence of sl-CSD in two other gregarious species, C. flavipes and C. sesamiae (Niyibigira et al, 2004a), and further laboratory inbreeding experiments have ruled out the presence of sl-CSD in C. flavipes (Niyibigira et al, 2004b). Therefore, our study has, for the first time, confirmed the presence of sl-CSD as a sex-determining mechanism in this large genus of theoretical and practical interest (Michel-Salzat and Whitfield, 2004). The presence of species with and without sl-CSD in this genus suggests that sex determination mechanisms are diverse even within the same genus. Furthermore, it raises interesting questions about evolutionary changes in the genetic system of sex determination in closely related species, and the influences of variable mechanisms on the behaviour and population biology of these species (Cook and Crozier, 1995; van Wilgenburg et al, 2006).
Sibling matings lead to the production of diploid males in C. golmerata. Our cytological examinations have shown that such diploid males possess a double set of chromosomes (2n=20), whereas haploid males contain a single set of maternal chromosomes (n=10). Based on the stylized figures from Hegner (1915), Gokhman and Quicke (1995) postulated that the haploid and diploid chromosome numbers of C. glomerata were 12 and 24, respectively, but in the meantime, they pointed out that Hegner did not provide a definitive statement on chromosome numbers, and hence such data should be considered with extreme caution. The basic number of chromosomes in C. glomerata revealed in the current study is the same as in many other braconid parasitoids, including Habrobracon (Bracon) hebetor Say (Torvik-Greb, 1935), H. pectinophorae Watanabe (Inaba cited in Mikino, 1951), H. serinopae Ramakrishna (Rasch et al, 1977), Meteorus gyrator Thunberg (Gokhman and Quicke, 1995), M. pallipes Wesmael (Gokhman and Quicke, 1995) and the related species, C. congregate (Belle et al, 2002).
Diploid males in some species with sl-CSD have a normal viability, although they can be either sterile (El Agoze et al, 1994; Krieger et al, 1999) or unable to fertilize females (Smith and Wallace, 1971; Naito and Suzuki, 1991). We have shown that diploid males in C. glomerata appear to have low survivorship, as compared to diploid females. As a high survival rate of pupae was found in the broods produced from both matched and unmatched matings, the death of diploid males might have occurred in the early developing stages. Although the survived diploid males of C. glomerata resemble haploid males in both size and viability (Y. Zhou, personal observation), we do not know about the fertility of diploid males in C. glomerata yet. Certainly, information on this aspect is important to understand the effects of sl-CSD on population biology in this species.
Natural populations of C. glomerata normally produce female-biased sex ratio in the field (Tagawa, 2000; Gu and Dorn, 2003), which is presumably the result of LMC (Hamilton, 1967). In this situation, mating is restricted to a local area or natal patch where a mother produces the minimum number of sons sufficient to inseminate all of her daughters in each patch, thus minimizing the level of competition between sons. Therefore, the species that manifest LMC are generally believed to have a high level of inbreeding (Hardy, 1994). Although C. glomerata has been reported to show a high inbreeding rate (about 60%) in the field because most of the emergent females are inactive and tend to mate with males from the same brood (Tagawa and Kitano, 1981), the post-emergence behaviour of the wasp determines that the inbreeding level of this species is much lower than we have intuitively assumed. Indeed, 30% of males and over 50% of females left their natal patch before copulating, and hence only 27.5% of females mated with the males emerging from the same brood, on average (Gu and Dorn, 2003). This inbreeding avoidance behaviour and consequently a lower inbreeding level are expected for the species with sl-CSD. Confirmation of sl-CSD in C. glomerata sheds a light on our previous suggestion that this parasitoid species adopts a sex allocation strategy based on both partial LMC in males and inbreeding avoidance in females (Gu and Dorn, 2003). However, more laboratory and field data are required to elucidate the sex allocation and mating system of this gregarious parasitoid in relation to its sex determination mechanism.
References
Adams J, Rothman ED, Kerr WE, Paulino ZL (1977). Estimation of the number of sex alleles and queen matings from diploid male frequencies in a population of Apis mellifera. Genetics 86: 539–596.
Belle E, Beckage NE, Rousselet J, Poirié M, Lemeunier F, Drezen J-M (2002). Visualization of polydnavirus sequences in a parasitoid wasp chromosome. J Virol 76: 5793–5796.
Beukeboom LW (1995). Sex determination in Hymenoptera: a need for genetic and molecular studies. BioEssays 17: 813–817.
Beukeboom LW (2001). Single-locus complementary sex determination in the ichneumonid Venturia canescens (Gravenhorst) (Hymenoptera). Neth J Zool 51: 1–15.
Beye M, Hasselmann M, Fondrk MK, Page Jr RE, Omholt SW (2003). The gene csd is the primary signal for sexual development in the honeybee and encodes an SR-type protein. Cell 114: 419–429.
Bridges CB (1925). Sex in relation to genes and chromosomes. Am Nat 59: 127–137.
Bull JJ (1981). Coevolution of haplo-diploidy and sex determination in the Hymenoptera. Evolution 35: 568–580.
Butcher RDJ, Whitfield WGF, Hubbard SF (2000a). Single-locus complementary sex determination in Diadegma chrysostictos (Gmelin) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). J Hered 91: 104–111.
Butcher RDJ, Whitfield WGF, Hubbard SF (2000b). Complementary sex determination in the genus Diadegma (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). J Evol Biol 13: 593–606.
Cook JM (1993). Sex determination in the Hymenoptera: a review of models and evidence. Heredity 71: 421–435.
Cook JM, Crozier RH (1995). Sex determination and population biology in the Hymenoptera. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 281–286.
Creste S, Neto AT, Flgueira A (2001). Detection of single sequence repeat polymorphisms in denaturing polyacrylamide sequencing gels by silver staining. Plant Mol Biol Rep 19: 299–306.
Crozier RH (1971). Heterozygosity and sex determination in haplo-diploidy. Am Nat 105: 399–412.
Crozier RH (1977). Evolutionary genetics of the Hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 22: 263–288.
Dobson SL, Tanouye MA (1998). Evidence for a genomic imprinting sex determination mechanism in Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Genetics 149: 233–242.
El Agoze M, Drezen JM, Renault S, Periquet G (1994). Analyses of the reproductive potential of diploid males of the wasp Diadromus pulchellus (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Bull Entomol Res 84: 213–218.
Gokhman VE, Quicke DLJ (1995). The last twenty years of parasitic Hymenoptera karyology: an update and phylogenetic implications. J Hym Res 4: 41–63.
Gu H, Dorn S (2000). Genetic variation in behavioural response to herbivore-infested plants in the parasitic wasp, Cotesia glomerata (L. Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J Insect Behav 13: 141–156.
Gu H, Dorn S (2003). Mating system and sex allocation in the gregarious parasitoid Cotesia glomerata. Anim Behav 66: 259–264.
Gu H, Wang Q, Dorn S (2003). Superparasitism in Cotesia glomerata: response of host and consequences for parasitoids. Ecol Entomol 28: 422–431.
Hamilton WD (1967). Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156: 477–488.
Hardy ICW (1994). Sex ratio and mating structure in the parasitoid Hymenoptera. Oikos 69: 3–20.
Hegner RW (1915). Studies of germ cells. IV. Protoplasmic differentiation in the oocytes of certain Hymenoptera. J Morph 26: 495–561.
Imai HT, Crozier RH, Taylor RW (1977). Karyotype evolution in Australian ants. Chromosoma (Berl.) 59: 341–393.
Kerr WE, Nielsen RA (1967). Sex determination in bees (Apinae). J Apicult Res 6: 3–9.
Krieger MJB, Ross KG, Chang CWY, Keller L (1999). Frequency and origin of triploidy in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Heredity 82: 142–150.
Liang JE, Levin DB (1982). A review of the biology and a bibliography of Apanteles glomeratus (L. Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Biocont News Inform 3: 7–23.
Mattiacci L, Ambühl RB, Scascighini N, d'Alessandro M, Hern A, Dorn S (2001). Systematically induced plant volatiles emitted at the time of ‘danger’. J Chem Ecol 27: 2233–2252.
Michel-Salzat A, Whitfield JB (2004). Preliminary evolutionary relationships within the parasitoid wasp genus Cotesia (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Microgastrinae): combined analyses of four genes. Syst Entomol 29: 371–382.
Mikino S (1951). An Atlas of Chromosome Numbers in Animals. Iowa State College Press: Ames.
Naito T, Suzuki H (1991). Sex determination in the sawfly, Athalia rosae ruficornis (Hymenoptera): occurrence of triploid males. J Hered 82: 101–104.
Niyibigira EI, Overholt WA, Stouthamer R (2004a). Cotesia flavipes Cameron and Cotesia sesamiae (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) does not exhibit complementary sex determination: evidence from field populations. Appl Entomol Zool 39: 705–717.
Niyibigira EI, Overholt WA, Stouthamer R (2004b). Cotesia flavipes Cameron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) does not exhibit complementary sex determination. (ii) Evidence from laboratory experiments. Appl Entomol Zool 39: 717–725.
Ockroy KS, Cole (Webb) TJ, Trenczek TE, Dorn S (2002). Comparison of parasitism by Cotesia glomerata with bacterial infection and wounding in Pieris brassicae: induction of new haemolymph polypeptides and changes in humoral immune response. J Invert Pathol 81: 12–18.
Paxton RJ, Thorén PA, Gyllenstrand N (2000). Microsatellite DNA analyses reveals low diploid male production in a communal bee with inbreeding. Biol J Linn Soc 69: 483–502.
Rasch EM, Cassidy JD, King RC (1977). Evidence for dosage compensation in parthenogenetic Hymenoptera. Chromosoma 59: 323–340.
Salin C, Deprez B, van Bockstaele DR, Mahillon J, Hance T (2004). Sex determination mechanism in the hymenopteran parasitoid Aphidius rhopalosiphi De Stefani-Peres (Braconidae: Aphidiinae). Belg J Zool 134 (Suppl): 15–21.
Smith SG, Wallace DR (1971). Allelic sex determination in a lower hymenopteran, Neodiprion nigroscutum Midd. Can J Genet Cytol 13: 617–621.
Stahlhut JK, Cowan DP (2004). Single-locus complementary sex determination in the inbreeding wasp Euodynerus foraminatus Saussure (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Heredity 92: 189–196.
Stille B, Dävring L (1980). Meiosis and reproductive strategies in the parthenogenetic gall wasp Diplolepis rosea. Hereditas 92: 353–362.
Stouthamer R, Luck RF, Nissen NI (1992). Genetics of sex determination and the improvement of biological control using parasitoids. Environ Entomol 21: 427–435.
Tagawa J (2000). Sex allocation and clutch size in the gregarious larval endoparasitoid wasp, Cotesia glomerata. Entomol Exp Appl 97: 193–202.
Tagawa J, Kitano H (1981). Mating behaviour of the braconid wasp, Apanteles glomeratus L. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in the field. Appl Entomol Zool 16: 345–350.
Torvik-Greb M (1935). The chromosomes of Habrobracon. Biol Bull 68: 25–34.
van Wilgenburg E, Driessen G, Beukeboom LW (2006). Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an ‘unintelligent’ design? Front Zool. (http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/3/1/1).
Wang Q, Gu H, Dorn S (2003). Selection on olfactory response to semiochemicals from a plant–host complex in a parasitic wasp. Heredity 91: 430–435.
Wang Q, Gu H, Dorn S (2004). Genetic relationship between olfactory response and fitness in Cotesia glomerata (L.). Heredity 92: 579–584.
Whiting PW (1943). Multiple alleles in complementary sex determination of Habrobracon. Genetics 28: 365–382.
Whiting PW (1945). The evolution of male haploidy. Quart Rev Biol 20: 231–260.
Whiting PW (1960). Polyploidy in Mormoniella. Genetics 45: 949–970.
Zar JH (1999). Biostatistical Analyses, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Englewood Cliff, NJ.
Zhou Y, Gu H, Dorn S (2005). Polymorphic microsatellite loci in the parasitic wasp Cotesia glomerata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Mol Ecol Notes 5: 475–477.
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to the Institute of Animal Sciences of ETH for access to their microscope facilities and to the group members of Applied Entomology who have provided various supports for this project. We thank Gerald Stranzinger, Kathrin Tschudi-Rein and Ngvyen Trung Thonh for their valuable advice and technical assistance during cytological studies. We also thank anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, Y., Gu, H. & Dorn, S. Single-locus sex determination in the parasitoid wasp Cotesia glomerata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Heredity 96, 487–492 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800829
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800829
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Progeny fitness determines the performance of the parasitoid Therophilus javanus, a prospective biocontrol agent against the legume pod borer
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
The Combined Use of an Attractive and a Repellent Sex Pheromonal Component by a Gregarious Parasitoid
Journal of Chemical Ecology (2019)
-
Complementary sex determination, inbreeding depression and inbreeding avoidance in a gregarious sawfly
Heredity (2016)
-
Population-level consequences of complementary sex determination in a solitary parasitoid
BMC Evolutionary Biology (2015)
-
Genetic diversity and complementary sex determination (CSD) in Dolerus aeneus (Hymenoptera, Symphyta): implications for the conservation of an ecologically-important sawfly
Conservation Genetics (2013)