Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Conditioning Regimens

Randomized trial of busulfan vs total body irradiation containing conditioning regimens for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium study

Summary:

Conditioning regimens for children with ALL have generally included total body irradation (TBI), which may result in significant sequelae. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome for children with ALL undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) with either busulfan (Bu) or TBI regimens. Patients <21 years with ALL undergoing allogeneic SCT were eligible. Conditioning included either Bu or TBI, with etoposide 40 mg/kg and cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg. Randomization was stratified based upon duration of remission, remission status, and prior cranial irradiation. A total of 43 patients were enrolled; 21 received Bu and 22 TBI. Median patient age was 8 years (0.5–20 years). Remission status included 12 patients in CR1, 25 in CR2, and six in CR3. At a median follow-up of 43 months, event-free survival (EFS) is 45% at 3 years, with 29% EFS in the Bu arm and 58% in the TBI arm (P=0.03). There was no significant difference between Bu and TBI for patients who received stem cells from related donors (36 vs 58%, P=0.3). However, for URD, EFS was 20% for Bu and 57% for TBI (P=0.04). Relapses were similar in both arms. This randomized prospective study suggests that Bu is inferior to TBI for pediatric patients with ALL undergoing allogeneic SCT.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ringden O, Ruutu T, Remberger M et al. A randomized trial comparing busulfan with total body irradiation as conditioning in allogeneic marrow transplantation recipients with leukemia: a report from the Nordic Bone Marrow Transplantation Group. Blood 1994; 83: 2723–2730.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clift R, Buckner C, Thomas E et al. Marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: a randomized study comparing cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation with busulfan and cyclophosphamide. Blood 1994; 84: 2036–2043.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Michel G, Gluckman E, Esperou-Bourdeau H et al. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for children with acute myeloblastic leukemia in first complete remission: impact of conditioning regimen without total-body irradiation – a report from the Societe Francaise de Greffe de Moelle. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 1217–1222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Emminger W, Emminger-Schmidmeier W, Haas OA et al. Treatment of infant leukemia with busulfan, cyclophosphamide +/− etoposide and bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1992; 9: 313–318.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lenarsky C, Weinberg K, Kohn D et al. Bone marrow transplantation for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia without total body irradiation. Blood 1994; 84 abst: 549a.

  6. Matsuyama T, Kojima S, Kato K . Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for childhood leukemia following a busulfan and melphalan preparative regimen. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 22: 21–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. von Bueltzingsloewen A, Esperou-Bourdeau H, Souillet G et al. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation following a busulfan-based conditioning regimen in young children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Cooperative Study of the Societe Francaise de Greffe de Moelle. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 16: 521–527.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deeg H, Storb R . Graft-versus-host disease: pathophysiological and clinical aspects. Ann Rev Med 1984; 3: 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Katz MH . Multivariable Analysis: A Practical Guide for Clinicians. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 1999 to 1992.

  10. Bhatia S, Louie AD, Bhatia R et al. Solid cancers after bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 464–471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Curtis RE, Rowlings PA, Deeg HJ et al. Solid cancers after bone marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 897–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Phipps S, Dunavant M, Srivastava DK et al. Cognitive and academic functioning in survivors of pediatric bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 1004–1011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sims S, Kazak A, Golomb V et al. Cognitive, behavioral, and social outcome in survivors of childhood stem cell transplantation. J Pediatr Hematol/Oncol 2002; 24: 115–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huma Z, Boulad F, Black P et al. Growth in children after bone marrow transplantation for acute leukemia. Blood 1995; 86: 819–824.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giorgiani G, Bozzola M, Locatelli F et al. Role of busulfan and total body irradiation on growth of prepubertal children receiving bone marrow transplantation and results of treatment with recombinant human growth hormone. Blood 1995; 86: 825–831.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Afify Z, Shaw PJ, Clavano-Harding A, Cowell CT . Growth and endocrine function in children with acute myeloid leukaemia after bone marrow transplantation using busulfan/cyclophosphamide. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 25: 1087–1092.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shankar S, Bunin N . Growth in children undergoing bone marrow transplantation using busulfan and cyclophosphamide. J Pediatr Hematol/Oncol 1996; 18: 362–366.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Michel G, Socie G, Gebhard F et al. Late effects of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for children with acute myeloblastic leukemia in first complete remission: The impact of conditioning regimen without total-body irradiation–a report from the Societe Francaise de Greffe de Moelle. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 2238–2246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Copelan EA, Biggs JC, Avalos BR et al. Radiation-free preparation for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 237–242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brown RA, Wolf SN, Fay JW et al. High dose etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in untreated first relapse: a study by the North American Marrow Transplant Group. Blood 1995; 85: 1391–1395.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Horstmann M, Kroschke G, Stockschlader M et al. Early toxicity of intensified conditioning with etoposide combined with total body irradiation/cyclophosphamide or busulfan/cyclophosphamide in children undergoing autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Pediatr Hematol/Oncol 1996; 13: 45–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zander AR, Berger C, Kroger N et al. High dose chemotherapy with busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide as conditioning regimen for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission. Clin Cancer Res 1997; 3: 2671–2675.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sandler ES, Hagg R, Coppes MJ et al. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) with a conditioning regimen of busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide for children with acute myelogenous leukemia AML): a phase I study of the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium. Med Pediatr Oncol 2000; 35: 403–409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Crilley P, Topolsky D, Styler MJ et al. Extramedullary toxicity of a conditioning regimen containing busulphan, cyclophosphamide and etoposide in 84 patients undergoing autologous and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 361–365.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Copelan EA, Penza SL, Pohlman B et al. Autotransplantation following busulfan, etoposide and cyclophosphamide in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 25: 1243–1248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Davies SM, Ramsay NKC, Klein JP et al. Comparison of preparative regimens in transplants for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 340–347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rozman C, Carreras E, Qian C et al. Risk factors for hepatic veno-occlusive disease following HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation for leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 17: 75–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ringden O, Remberger M, Ruutu T et al. Increased risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease, obstructive bronchiolitis, and alopecia with busulfan versus total body irradiation: long term results of a randomized trial in allogeneic marrow recipients with leukemia. Blood 1999; 93: 2196–2201.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ringden O, Labopin M, Tura S et al. A comparison of busulfan versus total body irradiation combined with cyclophosphamide as conditioning for autograft or allograft bone marrow transplantation in patients with acute leukemia. Br J Haematol 1996; 93: 637–645.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Socie G, Clift RA, Blaise D et al. Busulfan plus cyclophosphamide compared with total-body irradiation plus cyclophosphamide before marrow transplantation for myeloid leukemia: long-term follow-up of 4 randomized studies. Blood 2001; 98: 3569–3574.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mehta J, Powles RL, Mitchell P et al. Graft failure after bone marrow transplantation from unrelated donors using busulfphan and cyclophosphamide conditioning. Bone Marrow Transplant 1994; 13: 583–587.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Slattery JT, Sanders JE, Buckner CD et al. Graft-rejection and toxicity following bone marrow transplantation in relation to busulfan pharmacokinetics. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 16: 31–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Grochow L, Krivit W, Blazar B . Busulfan disposition in children. Blood 1990; 75: 1723–1727.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vassal G, Gouyette A, Hartmann O et al. Pharmacokinetics of high-dose busulfan in children. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1989; 24: 386–390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hassan M, Ljungman P, Bolme P et al. Busulfan bioavailability. Blood 1994; 84: 2144–2150.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shaw PJ, Hugh-Jones K, Hobbs JR et al. Busulphan and cyclophosphamide cause little early toxicity during displacement bone marrow transplantation in fifty children. Bone Marrow Transplant 1986; 1: 193.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schuler U, Schroer S, Kuhnle A et al. Busulfan pharmacokinetics in bone marrow transplant patients: is drug monitoring warranted? Bone Marrow Transplant 1994; 14: 759–765.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Baker K, Bostrom B, DeFor T et al. Busulfan pharmacokinetics do not predict relapse in acute myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 26: 607–614.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N Bunin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bunin, N., Aplenc, R., Kamani, N. et al. Randomized trial of busulfan vs total body irradiation containing conditioning regimens for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium study. Bone Marrow Transplant 32, 543–548 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704198

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704198

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links