Abstract
The day to day decisions made by general dental practitioners have a significant influence on the oral health of the population, and yet are often poorly understood. This paper describes a qualitative study which sought to identify issues, other than the extent of pathology, which impinge upon dentists' restorative treatment decision making. It also aimed to develop a classification of these issues. Content analysis of in-depth interviews with 20 randomly selected general dental practitioners delineated 10 broad areas of concern. While each of these topics may influence a treatment decision to a greater or lesser degree, the issues relating to treatment planning can be divided into a classification which involves patient, profession and practitioner characteristics. This study indicates that an understanding of disease processes and of available treatment options is an insufficient basis for treatment decision making, as many considerations outside these straightforward concepts of health are brought to bear on decisions made within the dental surgery
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kay, E., Blinkhorn, A. A qualitative investigation of factors governing dentists' treatment philosophies. Br Dent J 180, 171–176 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809010
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809010
This article is cited by
-
Paying for treatments? Influences on negotiating clinical need and decision-making for dental implant treatment
BMC Health Services Research (2009)
-
Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups
British Dental Journal (2008)
-
The prevalence and nature of recent self-reported changes in general dental practice in a sample of English general dental practitioners
British Dental Journal (2004)
-
Exploring dental patients' preferred roles in treatment decision-making – a novel approach
British Dental Journal (2003)
-
General dental practitioners' beliefs on the perceived effects of and their preferences for remuneration mechanisms
British Dental Journal (2002)