Abstract
Improving the quantum coherence of solid-state systems that mimic two-level atoms, for instance spin qubits or single-photon emitters using semiconductor quantum dots, involves dealing with the noise inherent to the device. Charge noise results in a fluctuating electric field, spin noise in a fluctuating magnetic field at the location of the qubit, and both can lead to dephasing and decoherence of optical and spin states. We investigate noise in an ultrapure semiconductor device using a minimally invasive, ultrasensitive local probe: resonance fluorescence from a single quantum dot. We distinguish between charge noise and spin noise through a crucial difference in their optical signatures. Noise spectra for both electric and magnetic fields are derived from 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz. The charge noise dominates at low frequencies, spin noise at high frequencies. The noise falls rapidly with increasing frequency, allowing us to demonstrate transform-limited quantum-dot optical linewidths by operating the device above 50 kHz.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Loss, D. & DiVincenzo, D. P. Quantum computation with quantum dots. Phys. Rev. A 57, 120–126 (1998).
Petta, J. R. et al. Coherent manipulation of coupled electron spins in semiconductor quantum dots. Science 309, 2180–2184 (2005).
Shields, A. J. Semiconductor quantum light sources. Nature Photon. 1, 215–223 (2007).
Fischer, J. & Loss, D. Dealing with decoherence. Science 324, 1277–1278 (2009).
Högele, A. et al. Voltage-controlled optics of a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 217401 (2004).
Atatüre, M. et al. Quantum-dot spin-state preparation with near-unity fidelity. Science 312, 551–553 (2006).
Houel, J. et al. Probing single-charge fluctuations at a GaAs/AlAs interface using laser spectroscopy on a nearby InGaAs quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 107401 (2012).
Klotz, F. et al. Observation of an electrically tunable exciton g factor in InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 053113 (2010).
Pingenot, J., Pryor, C. E. & Flatte, M. E. Electric-field manipulation of the Lande g tensor of a hole in an In(0.5)Ga(0.5)As/GaAs self-assembled quantum dot. Phys. Rev. B 84, 195403 (2011).
Merkulov, I. A., Efros, A. L. & Rosen, M. Electron spin relaxation by nuclei in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 65, 205309 (2002).
Khaetskii, A. V., Loss, D. & Glazman, L. Electron spin decoherence in quantum dots due to interaction with nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 186802 (2002).
Greilich, A. et al. Mode locking of electron spin coherences in singly charged quantum dots. Science 313, 341–345 (2006).
Xu, X. et al. Coherent population trapping of an electron spin in a single negatively charged quantum dot. Nature Phys. 4, 692–695 (2008).
Press, D. et al. Ultrafast optical spin echo in a single quantum dot. Nature Photon. 4, 367–370 (2010).
Barthel, C., Medford, J., Marcus, C. M., Hanson, M. P. & Gossard, A. C. Interlaced dynamical decoupling and coherent operation of a singlet–triplet qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 266808 (2010).
De Lange, G., Wang, Z. H., Riste, D., Dobrovitski, V. V. & Hanson, R. Universal dynamical decoupling of a single solid-state spin from a spin bath. Science 330, 60–63 (2010).
Bluhm, H. et al. Dephasing time of GaAs electron-spin qubits coupled to a nuclear bath exceeding 200 μs. Nature Phys. 7, 109–113 (2011).
Matthiesen, C., Vamivakas, A. N. & Atatúre, M. Subnatural linewidth single photons from a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 093602 (2012).
Nguyen, H. S. et al. Ultra-coherent single photon source. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 261904 (2011).
Urbaszek, B. et al. Nuclear spin physics in quantum dots: An optical investigation.Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 79–133 (2013).
Medford, J. et al. Scaling of dynamical decoupling for spin qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 086802 (2012).
Reilly, D. J. et al. Measurement of temporal correlations of the overhauser field in a double quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 236803 (2008).
Fink, T. & Bluhm, H. Noise spectroscopy using correlations of single-shot qubit readout. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 010403 (2013).
Crooker, S. A. & Bluhm, H. Spin noise of electrons and holes in self-assembled quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 036601 (2010).
Alen, B., Bickel, F., Karrai, K., Warburton, R. J. & Petroff, P. M. Stark-shift modulation absorption spectroscopy of single quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 2235–2237 (2003).
Vamivakas, A. N. et al. Nanoscale optical electrometer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 166802 (2011).
Coish, W. A. & Baugh, J. Nuclear spins in nanostructures. Phys. Stat. Sol. B 246, 2203–2215 (2009).
Kloeffel, C. et al. Controlling the interaction of electron and nuclear spins in a tunnel-coupled quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 046802 (2011).
Dalgarno, P. A. et al. Coulomb interactions in single charged self-assembled quantum dots: Radiative lifetime and recombination energy. Phys. Rev. B 77, 245311 (2008).
Machlup, S. Noise in semiconductors—spectrum of a 2-parameter random signal. J. Appl. Phys. 25, 341–343 (1954).
Berthelot, A. et al. Unconventional motional narrowing in the optical spectrum of a semiconductor quantum dot. Nature Phys. 2, 759–769 (2006).
Yilmaz, S. T., Fallahi, P. & Imamoglu, A. Quantum-dot-spin single-photon interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 033601 (2010).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge financial support from NCCR QSIT. We thank B. Coish, C. Kloeffel, D. Loss and S. Starosielec for helpful discussions; S. Martin and M. Steinacher for technical support. A.L., D.R. and A.D.W. acknowledge gratefully support from DFG SPP1285 and BMBF QuaHLRep 01BQ1035.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.V.K. and J.H. performed the experiments and data analysis with M.P. providing electronics and software expertise. A.L., D.R. and A.D.W. carried out the molecular beam epitaxy; L.G. and A.L. the sample processing. A.V.K. and R.J.W. took the lead in writing the paper. R.J.W. conceived, led and managed the entire project.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 744 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuhlmann, A., Houel, J., Ludwig, A. et al. Charge noise and spin noise in a semiconductor quantum device. Nature Phys 9, 570–575 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2688
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2688
This article is cited by
-
High-throughput quantum photonic devices emitting indistinguishable photons in the telecom C-band
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Giant optical polarisation rotations induced by a single quantum dot spin
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Tunable quantum dots in monolithic Fabry-Perot microcavities for high-performance single-photon sources
Light: Science & Applications (2024)
-
On-chip spin-photon entanglement based on photon-scattering of a quantum dot
npj Quantum Information (2023)
-
Coherent light scattering from a telecom C-band quantum dot
Nature Communications (2023)