Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Pharmacological REM sleep suppression paradoxically improves rather than impairs skill memory

Abstract

Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep has been considered important for consolidation of memories, particularly of skills. Contrary to expectations, we found that REM sleep suppression by administration of selective serotonin or norepinephrine re-uptake inhibitors after training did not impair consolidation of skills or word-pairs in healthy men but rather enhanced gains in finger tapping accuracy together with sleep spindles. Our results indicate that REM sleep as a unitary phenomenon is not required for skill-memory consolidation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Experimental procedure and main results.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walker, M.P. & Stickgold, R. Neuron 44, 121–133 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peigneux, P. et al. Neuroreport 12, A111–A124 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marshall, L. & Born, J. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 442–450 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, C. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 9, 157–168 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Karni, A. et al. Science 265, 679–682 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Born, J. et al. Neuroscientist 12, 410–424 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robertson, E.M. et al. Curr. Biol. 14, 208–212 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nishida, M. & Walker, M.P. PLoS ONE 2, e341 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tamaki, M. et al. Sleep 31, 204–211 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith, C. et al. Psychol. Belg. 44, 81–104 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCarley, R.W. Sleep Med. 8, 302–330 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayers, A.G. & Baldwin, D.S. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 20, 533–559 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Amado-Boccara, I. et al. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 19, 479–493 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Siegel, J.M. Science 294, 1058–1063 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vertes, R.P. Neuron 44, 135–148 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank E. Wiege, I. von Lützau, H. Ruf and A. Otterbein for technical assistance and L. Marshall for helpful discussions. This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 654 'Plasticity and Sleep'.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.R., J.P. and S.D. conducted the experiments and analyzed the data. B.R. and J.B. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Björn Rasch or Jan Born.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Tables 1–6, Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Results (PDF 401 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rasch, B., Pommer, J., Diekelmann, S. et al. Pharmacological REM sleep suppression paradoxically improves rather than impairs skill memory. Nat Neurosci 12, 396–397 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2206

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2206

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing