Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Two-photon calcium imaging from head-fixed Drosophila during optomotor walking behavior

Nature Methods volume 7, pages 535–540 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 28 January 2011

This article has been updated

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster is a model organism rich in genetic tools to manipulate and identify neural circuits involved in specific behaviors. Here we present a technique for two-photon calcium imaging in the central brain of head-fixed Drosophila walking on an air-supported ball. The ball's motion is tracked at high resolution and can be treated as a proxy for the fly's own movements. We used the genetically encoded calcium sensor, GCaMP3.0, to record from important elements of the motion-processing pathway, the horizontal-system lobula plate tangential cells (LPTCs) in the fly optic lobe. We presented motion stimuli to the tethered fly and found that calcium transients in horizontal-system neurons correlated with robust optomotor behavior during walking. Our technique allows both behavior and physiology in identified neurons to be monitored in a genetic model organism with an extensive repertoire of walking behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Setup for two-photon imaging from the brain of head-fixed flies walking on a ball.
Figure 2: High-precision ball tracking system allows online measurement of fly's virtual trajectory.
Figure 3: Optomotor behavior in tethered flies.
Figure 4: Optical imaging of dendrites of a motion-sensitive neuron during tethered walking.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 10 January 2011

    In the version of this article initially published, the units for angular position (degrees) in Figure 3a,b are incorrect. The correct unit should be mm. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. Vosshall, L.B. Into the mind of a fly. Nature 450, 193–197 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsen, S.R. & Wilson, R.I. Cracking neural circuits in a tiny brain: new approaches for understanding the neural circuitry of Drosophila. Trends Neurosci. 31, 512–520 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borst, A. Drosophila's view on insect vision. Curr. Biol. 19, R36–R47 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Simpson, J.H. Mapping and manipulating neural circuits in the fly brain. Adv. Genet. 65, 79–143 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gouwens, N.W. & Wilson, R.I. Signal propagation in Drosophila central neurons. J. Neurosci. 29, 6239–6249 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peron, S.P., Krapp, H.G. & Gabbiani, F. Influence of electrotonic structure and synaptic mapping on the receptive field properties of a collision-detecting neuron. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 159–177 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Haag, J. & Borst, A. Neural mechanism underlying complex receptive field properties of motion-sensitive interneurons. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 628–634 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Denk, W., Strickler, J.H. & Webb, W.W. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 248, 73–76 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, J.W., Wong, A.M., Flores, J., Vosshall, L.B. & Axel, R. Two-photon calcium imaging reveals an odor-evoked map of activity in the fly brain. Cell 112, 271–282 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jayaraman, V. & Laurent, G. Evaluating a genetically encoded optical sensor of neural activity using electrophysiology in intact adult fruit flies. Front. Neural Circuits 1, 3 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ng, M. et al. Transmission of olfactory information between three populations of neurons in the antennal lobe of the fly. Neuron 36, 463–474 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Churchland, M.M., Afshar, A. & Shenoy, K.V. A central source of movement variability. Neuron 52, 1085–1096 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bohm, H., Schildberger, K. & Huber, F. Visual and acoustic course control in the cricket Gryllus-Bimaculatus. J. Exp. Biol. 159, 235–248 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mason, A.C., Oshinsky, M.L. & Hoy, R.R. Hyperacute directional hearing in a microscale auditory system. Nature 410, 686–690 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Maimon, G., Straw, A.D. & Dickinson, M.H. Active flight increases the gain of visual motion processing in Drosophila. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 393–399 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Evarts, E.V. Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement. J. Neurophysiol. 31, 14–27 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wurtz, R.H. Visual cortex neurons: response to stimuli during rapid eye movements. Science 162, 1148–1150 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ono, T., Nakamura, K., Nishijo, H. & Fukuda, M. Hypothalamic neuron involvement in integration of reward, aversion, and cue signals. J. Neurophysiol. 56, 63–79 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dombeck, D.A., Khabbaz, A.N., Collman, F., Adelman, T.L. & Tank, D.W. Imaging large-scale neural activity with cellular resolution in awake, mobile mice. Neuron 56, 43–57 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Egelhaaf, M. et al. Neural encoding of behaviourally relevant visual-motion information in the fly. Trends Neurosci. 25, 96–102 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Borst, A. & Haag, J. Neural networks in the cockpit of the fly. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 188, 419–437 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Joesch, M., Plett, J., Borst, A. & Reiff, D.F. Response properties of motion-sensitive visual interneurons in the lobula plate of Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 18, 368–374 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schnell, B. et al. Processing of horizontal optic flow in three visual interneurons of the Drosophila brain. J Neurophysiol. 103, 1646–1657 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tian, L. et al. Imaging neural activity in worms, flies and mice with improved GCaMP calcium indicators. Nat. Methods 6, 875–881 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hausen, K. & Wehrhahn, C. Neural circuits mediating visual flight control in flies. I. Quantitative comparison of neural and behavioral response characteristics. J. Neurosci. 9, 3828–3836 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hausen, K. Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly. 1. The horizontal cells—structure and signals. Biol. Cybern. 45, 143–156 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hausen, K. Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly. 2. The horizontal cells—receptive-field organization and response characteristics. Biol. Cybern. 46, 67–79 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lehmann, F.O. & Dickinson, M.H. The changes in power requirements and muscle efficiency during elevated force production in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 200, 1133–1143 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Strausfeld, N.J. The head-neck system of the blowfly Calliphora. in The Head-Neck Sensory Motor System. (eds., Berthoz, A., Graf, W. and Vidal, P.P.) 56–63 (Oxford University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gotz, K.G. & Wenking, H. Visual control of locomotion in the walking fruitfly. Drosophila. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 85, 235–266 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Buchner, E. Elementary movement detectors in an insect visual-system. Biol. Cybern. 24, 85–101 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lott, G.K., Rosen, M.J. & Hoy, R.R. An inexpensive sub-millisecond system for walking measurements of small animals based on optical computer mouse technology. J. Neurosci. Methods 161, 55–61 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Reiser, M.B. & Dickinson, M.H. A modular display system for insect behavioral neuroscience. J. Neurosci. Methods 167, 127–139 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Strauss, R., Schuster, S. & Gotz, K.G. Processing of artificial visual feedback in the walking fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 200, 1281–1296 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Scott, E.K., Raabe, T. & Luo, L. Structure of the vertical and horizontal system neurons of the lobula plate in Drosophila. J. Comp. Neurol. 454, 470–481 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hausen, K. & Wehrhahn, C. Microsurgical lesion of horizontal cells changes optomotor yaw responses in the blowfly Calliphora Erythrocephala. Proc. Biol. Sci. 219, 211–216 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Geiger, G. & Nassel, D.R. Visual orientation behaviour of flies after selective laser beam ablation of interneurones. Nature 293, 398–399 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Blondeau, J. Electrically evoked course control in the fly Calliphora Erythrocephala. J. Exp. Biol. 92, 143–153 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Heisenberg, M., Wonneberger, R. & Wolf, R. Optomotor-blind—Drosophila mutant of lobula plate giant neurons. J. Comp. Physiol. 124, 287–296 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Durr, V. & Egelhaaf, M. In vivo calcium accumulation in presynaptic and postsynaptic dendrites of visual interneurons. J. Neurophysiol. 82, 3327–3338 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Haag, J. & Borst, A. Spatial distribution and characteristics of voltage-gated calcium signals within visual interneurons. J. Neurophysiol. 83, 1039–1051 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Haag, J. & Borst, A. Active membrane properties and signal encoding in graded potential neurons. J. Neurosci. 18, 7972–7986 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Pfeiffer, B.D. et al. Tools for neuroanatomy and neurogenetics in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 9715–9720 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Guizar-Sicairos, M., Thurman, S.T. & Fienup, J.R. Efficient subpixel image registration algorithms. Opt. Lett. 33, 156–158 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Reiff, D.F. et al. In vivo performance of genetically encoded indicators of neural activity in flies. J. Neurosci. 25, 4766–4778 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Olsen, S.R., Bhandawat, V. & Wilson, R.I. Excitatory interactions between olfactory processing channels in the Drosophila antennal lobe. Neuron 54, 89–103 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bausenwein, B., Muller, N.R. & Heisenberg, M. Behavior-dependent activity labeling in the central complex, of Drosophila during controlled visual-stimulation. J. Comp. Neurol. 340, 255–268 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Branson, K., Robie, A.A., Bender, J., Perona, P. & Dickinson, M.H. High-throughput ethomics in large groups of Drosophila. Nat. Methods 6, 451–457 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Pologruto, T.A., Sabatini, B.L. & Svoboda, K. ScanImage: flexible software for operating laser scanning microscopes. Biomed. Eng. Online 2, 13 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hopt, A. & Neher, E. Highly nonlinear photodamage in two-photon fluorescence microscopy. Biophys. J. 80, 2029–2036 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Simpson and S. Hampel for cloning GCaMPs into pMUH; D. Hall and K. Hibbard for fly crossing; members of Janelia's Fly Core and particularly G. Zhang for stock maintenance; K. Svoboda for donations of equipment and for advice in setting up our two-photon microscopes; D. Flickinger, S. Bassin, T. Tabachnik and C. Werner for contributions to the optical and mechanical design; V. Iyer for developing new ScanImage features and for support; T. Ofstad for assistance with free-walking experiments; N. Kladt for assistance with calibration experiments; M. Ahrens for software contributions and P. Coen for carrying out pilot experiments with the ball tracker. B. Pfeiffer and G. Rubin (Janelia Farm) provided pMUH. G. Rubin gifted us R27B03-Gal4. For pilot experiments, D. Reiff (Max Planck Institute, Martinsried) provided DB331-Gal4 and L. Luo (Stanford University) provided line 3A-Gal4. We received generous advice and support from others at Janelia Farm, including members of the Svoboda lab. This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Johannes D Seelig, M Eugenia Chiappe and Gus K Lott: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginaia, USA

    Johannes D Seelig, M Eugenia Chiappe, Gus K Lott, Anirban Dutta, Jason E Osborne, Michael B Reiser & Vivek Jayaraman

Authors
  1. Johannes D Seelig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M Eugenia Chiappe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gus K Lott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anirban Dutta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jason E Osborne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael B Reiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Vivek Jayaraman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.D.S., M.E.C., G.K.L., M.B.R. and V.J. designed the project. J.D.S. designed the fly-physiology-with-behavior preparation with input from J.E.O., M.E.C. and V.J.; J.D.S., M.E.C., A.D., J.E.O. and V.J. designed the mechanical setup; M.B.R., J.D.S. and M.E.C. designed the LED arena; G.K.L. designed the ball tracker with input from M.B.R. and V.J.; M.E.C., J.D.S., M.B.R. and V.J. calibrated the tracker; V.J. performed high-speed video experiments; J.D.S. performed free-walking behavior experiments; J.D.S. and M.E.C. performed all other behavior and physiology experiments; J.D.S., M.E.C. and V.J. performed data analysis; M.E.C. performed fly crosses; and V.J., J.D.S., M.E.C., G.K.L. and M.B.R. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivek Jayaraman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–13 (PDF 1677 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

Real-time movie showing multiple views of the fly walking in response to visual stimulation. Note: the xvid codec is required to play all movies. (AVI 5276 kb)

Supplementary Movie 2

Real-time movie showing fly-on-the-ball virtual two-dimensional trajectory during two-photon imaging trial in response to counterclockwise (blue) and then clockwise (red) global horizontal motion of vertical stripes (1-Hz spatial frequency). The frame rate was chosen to show fly's movements in real time. Frame size is 30 mm in the x dimension and 45 mm in the y dimension. (AVI 1580 kb)

Supplementary Movie 3

Real-time movie showing a second example of fly-on-the-ball virtual two-dimensional trajectory during two-photon imaging trial in response to counterclockwise (blue) and then clockwise (red) global horizontal motion of vertical stripes (1-Hz spatial frequency). The frame rate was chosen to show fly's movements in real time. Frame size is 30 mm in the x dimension and 45 mm in the y dimension. (AVI 1636 kb)

Supplementary Movie 4

Real-time movie showing (clockwise from top left): GCaMP signal from R27B03-Gal4 HS-neuron soma (shown in false color, linear intensity scale, window size: x = 62 μm, y = 67 μm); visual pattern presented to the fly (motion is first in the null direction for the HS neuron and then in the preferred direction); view of fly walking on ball from camera 3 (behind fly); traces of change in %ΔF/F (in green) and accumulated rotation (in black) as the motion stimuli are presented. Two-photon images were unfiltered (aside from xvid compression applied to entire movie) and not motion-corrected. (AVI 4623 kb)

Supplementary Movie 5

Real-time movie shows (clockwise from top left): GCaMP signal from R27B03-Gal4 HS-neuron dendrites (false color, linear intensity scale, window size: 43 μm); visual pattern presented to the fly (motion is first in the null direction for the HS neuron, then in the preferred direction and this protocol is repeated); view of fly walking on ball from camera 3 (behind fly); traces of change in %ΔF/F (in green) and accumulated rotation (in black) as the motion stimuli are presented. Two-photon images are unfiltered (aside from xvid compression of the movie) and not motion-corrected. (AVI 5414 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seelig, J., Chiappe, M., Lott, G. et al. Two-photon calcium imaging from head-fixed Drosophila during optomotor walking behavior. Nat Methods 7, 535–540 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1468

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1468

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing