Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Signaling by intrathymic cytokines, not T cell antigen receptors, specifies CD8 lineage choice and promotes the differentiation of cytotoxic-lineage T cells

Abstract

Immature CD4+CD8+ (double-positive (DP)) thymocytes are signaled via T cell antigen receptors (TCRs) to undergo positive selection and become responsive to intrathymic cytokines such as interleukin 7 (IL-7). We report here that cytokine signaling is required for positively selected thymocytes to express the transcription factor Runx3, specify CD8 lineage choice and differentiate into cytotoxic-lineage T cells. In DP thymocytes genetically engineered to be cytokine responsive, IL-7 signaling induced TCR-unsignaled DP thymocytes to express Runx3 and to differentiate into mature CD8+ T cells, completely circumventing positive selection. We conclude that TCR-mediated positive selection converts DP cells into cytokine-responsive thymocytes, but it is subsequent signaling by intrathymic cytokines that specifies CD8 lineage choice and promotes differentiation into cytotoxic-lineage T cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Impaired CD8+ T cell generation in Stat5a- and Stat5b-deficient mice.
Figure 2: The generation of CD8+ T cells requires STAT-mediated cytokine signaling.
Figure 3: IL-7 signaling induces Runx3, which specifies CD8 lineage choice.
Figure 4: Effect of in vitro IL-7 signaling on cytokine-responsive preselection DP thymocytes.
Figure 5: In vivo IL-7 signaling of 7SZ thymocytes induces their differentiation into mature CD8+ T cells.
Figure 6: Transgenic IL-7 expression induces efficient CD8+ T cell differentiation in 7SZ mice.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jameson, S.C., Hogquist, K.A. & Bevan, M.J. Positive selection of thymocytes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13, 93–126 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Singer, A. New perspectives on a developmental dilemma: the kinetic signaling model and the importance of signal duration for the CD4/CD8 lineage decision. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 14, 207–215 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Surh, C.D. & Sprent, J. T-cell apoptosis detected in situ during positive and negative selection in the thymus. Nature 372, 100–103 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Van De Wiele, C.J. et al. Thymocytes between the β-selection and positive selection checkpoints are nonresponsive to IL-7 as assessed by STAT-5 phosphorylation. J. Immunol. 172, 4235–4244 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu, Q. et al. Cytokine signal transduction is suppressed in preselection double-positive thymocytes and restored by positive selection. J. Exp. Med. 203, 165–175 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chong, M.M. et al. Suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 is a critical regulator of interleukin-7-dependent CD8+ T cell differentiation. Immunity 18, 475–487 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zamisch, M. et al. Ontogeny and regulation of IL-7-expressing thymic epithelial cells. J. Immunol. 174, 60–67 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alves, N.L. et al. Characterization of the thymic IL-7 niche in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1512–1517 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Repass, J.F. et al. IL7-hCD25 and IL7-Cre BAC transgenic mouse lines: new tools for analysis of IL-7 expressing cells. Genesis 47, 281–287 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Singer, A., Adoro, S. & Park, J.H. Lineage fate and intense debate: myths, models and mechanisms of CD4- versus CD8-lineage choice. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8, 788–801 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Takahama, Y., Suzuki, H., Katz, K.S., Grusby, M.J. & Singer, A. Positive selection of CD4+ T cells by TCR ligation without aggregation even in the absence of MHC. Nature 371, 67–70 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohoka, Y. et al. In vitro differentiation and commitment of CD4+ CD8+ thymocytes to the CD4 lineage, without TCR engagement. Int. Immunol. 8, 297–306 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brugnera, E. et al. Coreceptor reversal in the thymus: signaled CD4+8+ thymocytes initially terminate CD8 transcription even when differentiating into CD8+ T cells. Immunity 13, 59–71 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Egawa, T., Tillman, R.E., Naoe, Y., Taniuchi, I. & Littman, D.R. The role of the Runx transcription factors in thymocyte differentiation and in homeostasis of naive T cells. J. Exp. Med. 204, 1945–1957 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. He, X. et al. The zinc finger transcription factor Th-POK regulates CD4 versus CD8 T-cell lineage commitment. Nature 433, 826–833 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. He, X. et al. CD4–CD8 lineage commitment is regulated by a silencer element at the ThPOK transcription-factor locus. Immunity 28, 346–358 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Setoguchi, R. et al. Repression of the transcription factor Th-POK by Runx complexes in cytotoxic T cell development. Science 319, 822–825 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, G. et al. The zinc finger protein cKrox directs CD4 lineage differentiation during intrathymic T cell positive selection. Nat. Immunol. 6, 373–381 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, L. et al. Distinct functions for the transcription factors GATA-3 and ThPOK during intrathymic differentiation of CD4+ T cells. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1122–1130 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sato, T. et al. Dual functions of Runx proteins for reactivating CD8 and silencing CD4 at the commitment process into CD8 thymocytes. Immunity 22, 317–328 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Egawa, T. & Littman, D.R. ThPOK acts late in specification of the helper T cell lineage and suppresses Runx-mediated commitment to the cytotoxic T cell lineage. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1131–1139 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Egawa, T. & Taniuchi, I. Antagonistic interplay between ThPOK and Runx in lineage choice of thymocytes. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 43, 27–29 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, L. & Bosselut, R. CD4–CD8 lineage differentiation: Thpok-ing into the nucleus. J. Immunol. 183, 2903–2910 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cui, Y. et al. Inactivation of Stat5 in mouse mammary epithelium during pregnancy reveals distinct functions in cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 8037–8047 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaplan, M.H., Schindler, U., Smiley, S.T. & Grusby, M.J. Stat6 is required for mediating responses to IL-4 and for development of Th2 cells. Immunity 4, 313–319 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hanada, T. et al. A mutant form of JAB/SOCS1 augments the cytokine-induced JAK/STAT pathway by accelerating degradation of wild-type JAB/CIS family proteins through the SOCS-box. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 40746–40754 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kubo, M., Hanada, T. & Yoshimura, A. Suppressors of cytokine signaling and immunity. Nat. Immunol. 4, 1169–1176 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Metcalf, D. The SOCS-1 story. Exp. Hematol. 27, 1715–1723 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bosselut, R., Guinter, T.I., Sharrow, S.O. & Singer, A. Unraveling a revealing paradox: Why major histocompatibility complex I-signaled thymocytes 'paradoxically' appear as CD4+8lo transitional cells during positive selection of CD8+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 197, 1709–1719 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lundberg, K., Heath, W., Kontgen, F., Carbone, F.R. & Shortman, K. Intermediate steps in positive selection: differentiation of CD4+8int TCRint thymocytes into CD48+TCRhi thymocytes. J. Exp. Med. 181, 1643–1651 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Merkenschlager, M. et al. Centromeric repositioning of coreceptor loci predicts their stable silencing and the CD4/CD8 lineage choice. J. Exp. Med. 200, 1437–1444 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Suzuki, H., Punt, J.A., Granger, L.G. & Singer, A. Asymmetric signaling requirements for thymocyte commitment to the CD4+ versus CD8+ T cell lineages: a new perspective on thymic commitment and selection. Immunity 2, 413–425 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Taniuchi, I. et al. Differential requirements for Runx proteins in CD4 repression and epigenetic silencing during T lymphocyte development. Cell 111, 621–633 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu, Q., Erman, B., Bhandoola, A., Sharrow, S.O. & Singer, A. In vitro evidence that cytokine receptor signals are required for differentiation of double positive thymocytes into functionally mature CD8+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 197, 475–487 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Linette, G.P. et al. Bcl-2 is upregulated at the CD4+ CD8+ stage during positive selection and promotes thymocyte differentiation at several control points. Immunity 1, 197–205 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Vernachio, J., Li, M., Donnenberg, A.D. & Soloski, M.J. Qa-2 expression in the adult murine thymus. A unique marker for a mature thymic subset. J. Immunol. 142, 48–56 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. El Kassar, N. et al. A dose effect of IL-7 on thymocyte development. Blood 104, 1419–1427 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ueno, T. et al. CCR7 signals are essential for cortex-medulla migration of developing thymocytes. J. Exp. Med. 200, 493–505 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kwan, J. & Killeen, N. CCR7 directs the migration of thymocytes into the thymic medulla. J. Immunol. 172, 3999–4007 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Park, J.H. et al. 'Coreceptor tuning': cytokine signals transcriptionally tailor CD8 coreceptor expression to the self-specificity of the TCR. Nat. Immunol. 8, 1049–1059 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhu, J. et al. Transient inhibition of interleukin 4 signaling by T cell receptor ligation. J. Exp. Med. 192, 1125–1134 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ellmeier, W., Sunshine, M.J., Losos, K., Hatam, F. & Littman, D.R. An enhancer that directs lineage-specific expression of CD8 in positively selected thymocytes and mature T cells. Immunity 7, 537–547 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Muroi, S. et al. Cascading suppression of transcriptional silencers by ThPOK seals helper T cell fate. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1113–1121 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Jones, M.E. & Zhuang, Y. Acquisition of a functional T cell receptor during T lymphocyte development is enforced by HEB and E2A transcription factors. Immunity 27, 860–870 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hosui, A. et al. Loss of STAT5 causes liver fibrosis and cancer development through increased TGF-β and STAT3 activation. J. Exp. Med. 206, 819–831 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sentman, C.L., Shutter, J.R., Hockenbery, D., Kanagawa, O. & Korsmeyer, S.J. Bcl-2 inhibits multiple forms of apoptosis but not negative selection in thymocytes. Cell 67, 879–888 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Yu, Q., Erman, B., Park, J.H., Feigenbaum, L. & Singer, A. IL-7 receptor signals inhibit expression of transcription factors TCF-1, LEF-1, and RORγt: impact on thymocyte development. J. Exp. Med. 200, 797–803 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kaye, J. et al. Selective development of CD4+ T cells in transgenic mice expressing a class II MHC-restricted antigen receptor. Nature 341, 746–749 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Marine, J.C. et al. SOCS1 deficiency causes a lymphocyte-dependent perinatal lethality. Cell 98, 609–616 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Chu, D.H. et al. Pre-T cell receptor signals are responsible for the down-regulation of Syk protein tyrosine kinase expression. J. Immunol. 163, 2610–2620 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Bosselut, N. El Kassar, R. Hodes, D. Singer and N. Taylor for critical reading of the manuscript; S. Habu (Tokai University) for mouse Runx3 cDNA; A. Weiss (University of California San Francisco) for fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated monoclonal antibody to Syk (5F5); J. Ihle (St. Jude Children's Research Hospital) for Socs1+/−Ifng−/− mice; and S. Sharrow, A. Adams and L. Granger for flow cytometry. Supported by the Intramural Research Program of the US National Institutes of Health, the National Cancer Institute and the Center for Cancer Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.-H.P. did experiments, analyzed data and contributed to the writing of the manuscript; S.A., T.G., M.C., M.Y.K. and P.J.L. did experiments and analyzed data; B.E. and A.S.A. constructed some of the experimental mice; Y.C., R.E.G., M.K. and L.H. provided experimental mice; L.F. generated transgenic mice; and A.S. conceptualized the research, directed the study, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfred Singer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–8 (PDF 1132 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, JH., Adoro, S., Guinter, T. et al. Signaling by intrathymic cytokines, not T cell antigen receptors, specifies CD8 lineage choice and promotes the differentiation of cytotoxic-lineage T cells. Nat Immunol 11, 257–264 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1840

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1840

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing