This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Lang K (1986) Conservative therapy of phimosis [German]. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 134: 824–825
Lund L et al. (2005) An 18-month follow-up study after randomized treatment of phimosis in boys with topical steroid versus placebo. Scand J Urol Nephrol 39: 78–81
Dewan PA et al. (1996) Phimosis: is circumcision necessary? J Paediatr Child Health 32: 285–289
Oster J (1968) Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys. Arch Dis Child 43: 200–203
McGregor TB et al. (2005) Phimosis—a diagnostic dilemma? Can J Urol 12: 2598–2602
Acknowledgements
The synopsis was written by Mandy Aujla, Assistant Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abidari, J. Effectiveness of topical steroid treatment for phimosis. Nat Rev Urol 4, 246–247 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0758
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0758