Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Therapy Insight: what nephrologists need to know about primary vesicoureteral reflux

Abstract

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is the abnormal, retrograde flow of urine from the bladder to the upper urinary tract. This disease affects about 1% of otherwise normal children, 30–50% of those who present with urinary tract infections, and approximately 10% with prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis. Over the past 50 years, tremendous progress has been made in the diagnosis, treatment and management of VUR. The realization that VUR is probably a component of generalized dysfunction of the lower urinary tract (i.e. dysfunctional elimination syndrome) has further enhanced understanding of the disease. This Review covers basic pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, clinical presentation, and current controversies surrounding VUR.

Key Points

  • Primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) probably involves both an anatomic deficiency at the ureterovesical junction as well as generalized dysfunction of the lower urinary tract

  • Management of VUR in children is complex and needs to be tailored to individual patients; pediatricians, nephrologists and pediatric urologists should have the common goal of preventing renal damage

  • Surgical therapy is an important part of the armamentarium for VUR treatment, especially in patients with high reflux grades and/or concomitant anomalies of the bladder or ureter

  • Endoscopic treatment of VUR has a lower success rate than open surgery, and the long-term effects, outcomes and risks of this new technique are not established

  • The use of low-dose prophylactic antibiotics in patients with VUR is empirical and based on over 50 years of successful management of children with reflux

  • Well-designed double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are required to prove whether antibiotic prophylaxis is necessary

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: International Reflux Grading classification scheme for vesicoureteral reflux.116
Figure 2: Anatomic abnormalities associated with vesicoureteral reflux.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lebowitz RL (1992) The detection and characterization of vesicoureteral reflux in the child. J Urol 148: 1640–1642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sargent MA (2000) What is the normal prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux? Pediatr Radiol 30: 587–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Woodward M and Frank D (2002) Postnatal management of antenatal hydronephrosis. BJU Int 89: 149–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kunin CM (1970) The natural history of recurrent bacteriuria in schoolgirls. N Engl J Med 282: 1443–1448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chertin B and Puri P (2003) Familial vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 169: 1804–1808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Noe HN et al. (1992) The transmission of vesicoureteral reflux from parent to child. J Urol 148: 1869–1871

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hollowell JG and Greenfield SP (2002) Screening siblings for vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 168: 2138–2141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wan J et al. (1996) Sibling reflux: a dual center retrospective study. J Urol 156: 677–679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaefer M et al. (2000) Sibling vesicoureteral reflux in multiple gestation births. Pediatrics 105: 800–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Puri P et al. (1998) Urinary tract infection and renal damage in sibling vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 160: 1028–1030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Noe HN (1992) The long-term results of prospective sibling reflux screening. J Urol 148: 1739–1742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mak RH and Kuo HJ (2003) Primary ureteral reflux: emerging insights from molecular and genetic studies. Curr Opin Pediatr 15: 181–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haszon I et al. (2002) ACE gene polymorphism and renal scarring in primary vesicoureteric reflux. Pediatr Nephrol 17: 1027–1031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Willi U and Treves S (1983) Radionuclide voiding cystography. Urol Radiol 5: 161–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Beetz R (2006) May we go on with antibacterial prophylaxis for urinary tract infections? Pediatr Nephrol 21: 5–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Olbing H (1986) Comparison of the surgical and nonsurgical treatment of primary vesico-ureteral-renal reflux—an international reflux study [German]. Kinderarztl Prax 54: 493–499

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Olbing H et al. (2003) New renal scars in children with severe VUR: a 10-year study of randomized treatment. Pediatr Nephrol 18: 1128–1131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smellie J et al. (1975) Vesico-ureteric reflux and renal scarring. Kidney Int 8 (Suppl 4): S65–S72

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smellie JM et al. (1994) Retrospective study of children with renal scarring associated with reflux and urinary infection. BMJ 308: 1193–1196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Smellie JM et al. (1998) Childhood reflux and urinary infection: a follow-up of 10–41 years in 226 adults. Pediatr Nephrol 12: 727–736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weiss R et al. (1992) Results of a randomized clinical trial of medical versus surgical management of infants and children with grades III and IV primary vesicoureteral reflux (United States). The International Reflux Study in Children. J Urol 148: 1667–1673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts JA (1991) Etiology and pathophysiology of pyelonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis 17: 1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Walker D and Richard GA (1973) A critical evaluation of urethral obstruction in female children. Pediatrics 51: 272–277

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Uehling DT (1971) Effect of vesicoureteral reflux on concentrating ability. J Urol 106: 947–950

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kincaid-Smith P (1975) Glomerular and vascular lesions in chronic atrophic pyelonephritis and reflux nephropathy. Adv Nephrol Necker Hosp 5: 3–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hodson CJ (1959) The radiologic diagnosis of pyelonephritis. Proc R Soc Med 52: 669–672

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ransley PG and Risdon RA (1979) The pathogenesis of reflux nephropathy. Contrib Nephrol 16: 90–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hodson CJ and Twohill SA (1984) The time factor in the development of sterile renal scarring following high-pressure vesicoureteral reflux. Contrib Nephrol 39: 358–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Silva JM et al. (2006) Clinical course of 735 children and adolescents with primary vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Nephrol 21: 981–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Smellie JM (1995) The intravenous urogram in the detection and evaluation of renal damage following urinary tract infection. Pediatr Nephrol 9: 213–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Goldraich NP and Goldraich IH (1992) Followup of conservatively treated children with high and low grade vesicoureteral reflux: a prospective study. J Urol 148: 1688–1692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chand DH et al. (2003) Incidence and severity of vesicoureteral reflux in children related to age, gender, race and diagnosis. J Urol 170: 1548–1550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Smellie J et al. (1985) Development of new renal scars: a collaborative study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 290: 1957–1960

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Funston M and Cremin B (1978) Intrarenal reflux-papillary morphology and pressure relationships in children's necropsy kidneys. Br J Urol 51: 665–670

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Holland NH et al. (1990) Relation of urinary tract infection and vesicoureteral reflux to scars: follow-up of thirty-eight patients. J Pediatr 116: S65–S71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Smellie JM (1992) Commentary: management of children with severe vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 148: 1676–1678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hodson CJ (1978) Focal scarring and renal reflux. Lancet 2: 784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ransley PG and Risdon RA (1981) Reflux nephropathy: effects of antimicrobial therapy on the evolution of the early pyelonephritic scar. Kidney Int 20: 733–742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Roberts JA et al. (1982) Vesicoureteral reflux in the primate: IV. Does reflux harm the kidney? J Urol 128: 650–652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Smellie JM and Normand IC (1979) Reflux nephropathy in childhood. In Reflux Nephropathy, 14–20 (Eds Hodson CJ and Kinkaid-Smith P) New York: Masson Publishing

  41. Wald ER (2006) Vesicoureteral reflux: the role of antibiotic prophylaxis. Pediatrics 117: 919–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hellerstein S (2000) Long-term consequences of urinary tract infections. Curr Opin Pediatr 12: 125–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wheeler D et al. (2003) Antibiotics and surgery for vesicoureteric reflux: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Arch Dis Child 88: 688–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Garin EH et al. (2006) Clinical significance of primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary antibiotic prophylaxis after acute pyelonephritis: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Pediatrics 117: 626–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ardissino G et al. (2003) Epidemiology of chronic renal failure in children: data from the ItalKid project. Pediatrics 111: e382–e387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lahdes-Vasama T et al. (2006) Outcome of kidneys in patients treated for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) during childhood. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21: 2491–2497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ardissino G et al. (2004) Long-term outcome of vesicoureteral reflux associated chronic renal failure in children: data from the ItalKid Project. J Urol 172: 305–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Caione P et al. (2004) Predictive risk factors for chronic renal failure in primary high-grade vesico-ureteric reflux. BJU Int 93: 1309–1312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kabler RL and Cerny JC (1983) Pre-transplant urologic investigation and treatment of end stage renal disease. J Urol 129: 475–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Barai S et al. (2004) Prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux in patients with incidentally diagnosed adult hypertension. Urology 63: 1045–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Coulthard MG et al. (1997) Occurrence of renal scars in children after their first referral for urinary tract infection. BMJ 315: 918–919

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Robson WL and Leung AK (2001) Scarring is the central issue in urinary tract infection, not vesicoureteral reflux. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 40: 302–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. O'Regan S et al. (1986) Constipation associated with vesicoureteral reflux. Urology 28: 394–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chen JJ et al. (2004) A multivariate analysis of dysfunctional elimination syndrome, and its relationships with gender, urinary tract infection and vesicoureteral reflux in children. J Urol 171: 1907–1910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chandra M and Maddix H (2000) Urodynamic dysfunction in infants with vesicoureteral reflux. J Pediatr 136: 754–759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Naseer SR and Steinhardt GF (1997) New renal scars in children with urinary tract infections, vesicoureteral reflux and voiding dysfunction: a prospective evaluation. J Urol 158: 566–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bower WF et al. (2005) Dysfunctional elimination symptoms in childhood and adulthood. J Urol 174: 1623–1627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Koff SA et al. (1998) The relationship among dysfunctional elimination syndromes, primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infections in children. J Urol 160: 1019–1022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Gordon I et al. (2003) Primary vesicoureteric reflux as a predictor of renal damage in children hospitalized with urinary tract infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 739–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Newman TB (2005) Evidence does not support American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation for routine imaging after a first urinary tract infection. Pediatrics 116: 1613–1614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Zamir G et al. (2004) Urinary tract infection: is there a need for routine renal ultrasonography? Arch Dis Child 89: 466–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Cohen AL et al. (2005) Compliance with guidelines for the medical care of first urinary tract infections in infants: a population-based study. Pediatrics 115: 1474–1478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Hoberman A et al. (2003) Imaging studies after a first febrile urinary tract infection in young children. N Engl J Med 348: 195–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Cleveland RH et al. (1992) Voiding cystourethrography in children: value of digital fluoroscopy in reducing radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158: 137–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Diamond DA et al. (1996) The tailored low dose fluoroscopic voiding cystogram for familial reflux screening. J Urol 155: 681–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kleinman PK et al. (1994) Tailored low-dose fluoroscopic voiding cystourethrography for the reevaluation of vesicoureteral reflux in girls. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162: 1151–1154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Mooney RB and McKinstry J (2001) Paediatric dose reduction with the introduction of digital fluorography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 94: 117–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Ward VL et al. (2003) Radiation exposure and imaging quality: preliminary results of a comparison of variable-rate pulsed fluoroscopy with continuous fluoroscopy in a swine model of pediatric genitourinary abnormalities. Presented at the Annual Meeting of Association of University Radiologists: 2003 April 9–12, Miami, FL, USA

  69. Persliden J et al. (2004) Dose and image quality in the comparison of analogue and digital techniques in paediatric urology examinations. Eur Radiol 14: 638–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hernandez RJ and Goodsitt MM (1996) Reduction of radiation dose in pediatric patients using pulsed fluoroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167: 1247–1253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Boland GW et al. (2000) Dose reduction in gastrointestinal and genitourinary fluoroscopy: use of grid-controlled pulsed fluoroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175: 1453–1457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Bazopoulos EV et al. (1998) A comparison between digital fluoroscopic hard copies and 105 mm spot films in evaluating vesicoureteric reflux in children. Pediatr Radiol 28: 162–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Lederman HM et al. (2002) Dose reduction fluoroscopy in pediatrics. Pediatr Radiol 32: 844–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Lee RS et al. (2006) Applying the ALARA concept to the evaluation of vesicoureteric reflux. Pediatr Radiol 36 (Suppl 2): 185–191

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. [No authors listed] (1987) Prospective trial of operative versus non-operative treatment of severe vesicoureteric reflux in children: five years' observation. Birmingham Reflux Study Group. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 295: 237–241

  76. Husmann DA and Allen TD (1991) Resolution of vesicoureteral reflux in completely duplicated systems: fact or fiction? J Urol 145: 1022–1023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Peppas DS et al. (1991) Nonsurgical management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in complete ureteral duplication: is it justified? J Urol 146: 1594–1595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Elder JS et al. (1997) Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reflux Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. J Urol 157: 1846–1851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Elder JS (2000) Guidelines for consideration for surgical repair of vesicoureteral reflux. Curr Opin Urol 10: 579–585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Smellie JM et al. (2001) Medical versus surgical treatment in children with severe bilateral vesicoureteric reflux and bilateral nephropathy: a randomised trial. Lancet 357: 1329–1333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Marra G et al. (2004) Severe vesicoureteral reflux and chronic renal failure: a condition peculiar to male gender? Data from the ItalKid Project. J Pediatr 144: 677–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Silva JM et al. (2003) Features of primary vesicoureteral reflux and renal damage in children at a single institution in Brazil from 1969 to 1999. Int Urol Nephrol 35: 161–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Scott JE (1987) Fetal ureteric reflux. Br J Urol 59: 291–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Blumenthal I (2006) Vesicoureteric reflux and urinary tract infection in children. Postgrad Med J 82: 31–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Silva JM et al. (2006) Gender and vesico-ureteral reflux: a multivariate analysis. Pediatr Nephrol 21: 510–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Arant BS Jr (2001) Vesicoureteral reflux and evidence-based management. J Pediatr 139: 620–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Scholtmeijer RJ (1993) Treatment of vesicoureteric reflux: results of a prospective study. Br J Urol 71: 346–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Belman AB (1997) Vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Clin North Am 44: 1171–1190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Hodson EM et al. Interventions for primary vesicoureteric reflux. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001532.pub3. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001532.pub3

  90. Jodal U et al. (2006) Ten-year results of randomized treatment of children with severe vesicoureteral reflux: final report of the International Reflux Study in Children. Pediatr Nephrol 21: 785–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Vallee JP et al. (1999) Contemporary incidence of morbidity related to vesicoureteral reflux. Urology 53: 812–815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Beer E (1933) Value of ureteral reimplantation in the bladder. Am J Surg 20: 8–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Sampson J (1903) Ascending infection: with special reference to reflux of urine from the bladder into the ureters as an etiological factor in its causation and maintenance. Johns Hopkins Med J 14: 344–352

    Google Scholar 

  94. Hodson C and Edwards D (1960) Chronic pyelonephritis and vesicoureteric reflux. Clin Radiol 6: 219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Politano VA (1958) An operative technique for the correction of vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 79: 932–941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Paquin AJ Jr (1959) Ureterovesical anastomosis: the description and evaluation of a technique. J Urol 82: 573–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Cohen S (1975) Ureterocystoneostomy: a new antireflux technique [German]. Akt Urol 6: 1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Lich R Jr et al. (1964) The ureterovesical junction of the newborn. J Urol 92: 436–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Linn R et al. (1989) Lich–Gregoir anti-reflux operation: a surgical experience and 5–20 years of follow-up in 149 ureters. Eur Urol 16: 200–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Heidenreich A et al. (2004) Surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux in pediatric patients. World J Urol 22: 96–106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Gonzales ET et al. (1972) Results of distal tunnel ureteral reimplantation. J Urol 107: 572–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Gonzales ET et al. (1972) An analysis of various modes of therapy for vesicoureteral reflux. Int Urol Nephrol 4: 235–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Ellsworth PI et al. (2000) Surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux. AORN J 71: 498–505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Atala A et al. (1993) Laparoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 150: 748–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Kutikov A et al. (2006) Initial experience with laparoscopic transvesical ureteral reimplantation at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. J Urol 176: 2222–2225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Riquelme M et al. (2006) Laparoscopic extravesical transperitoneal approach for vesicoureteral reflux. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16: 312–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Matouschek E (1981) New concept for the treatment of vesico-ureteral reflux: endoscopic application of Teflon [Spanish]. Arch Esp Urol 34: 385–388

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. O'Donnell B and Puri P (1988) Technical refinements in endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 140: 1101–1102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Elder JS et al. (2006) Endoscopic therapy for vesicoureteral reflux: a meta-analysis: I. Reflux resolution and urinary tract infection. J Urol 175: 716–722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Kirsch AJ et al. (2004) The modified sting procedure to correct vesicoureteral reflux: improved results with submucosal implantation within the intramural ureter. J Urol 171: 2413–2416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Keating MA (2005) Role of periureteral injections in children with vesicoureteral reflux. Curr Opin Urol 15: 369–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Charbonneau SG et al. (2005) Is long-term sonographic followup necessary after uncomplicated ureteral reimplantation in children? J Urol 174: 1429–1431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Grossklaus DJ et al. (2001) Is postoperative cystography necessary after ureteral reimplantation? Urology 58: 1041–1045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. El-Ghoneimi A et al. (1999) Cystography after the Cohen ureterovesical reimplantation: is it necessary at a training center? J Urol 162: 1201–1202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Bensman A and Ulinski T (2006) International Vesicoureteral Reflux Study: unsolved questions remaining. Pediatr Nephrol 21: 757–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. [No authors listed] (1981) Medical versus surgical treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux: report of the International Reflux Study Committee. Pediatrics 67: 392–400

Download references

Acknowledgements

Charles P Vega, University of California, Irvine, CA, is the author of and is solely responsible for the content of the learning objectives, questions and answers of the Medscape-accredited continuing medical education activity associated with this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A Diamond.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gargollo, P., Diamond, D. Therapy Insight: what nephrologists need to know about primary vesicoureteral reflux. Nat Rev Nephrol 3, 551–563 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0610

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0610

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing