Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Adaptive force transmission in amoeboid cell migration

Abstract

The leading front of a cell can either protrude as an actin-free membrane bleb that is inflated by actomyosin-driven contractile forces, or as an actin-rich pseudopodium, a site where polymerizing actin filaments push out the membrane1,2,3. Pushing filaments can only cause the membrane to protrude if the expanding actin network experiences a retrograde counter-force, which is usually provided by transmembrane receptors of the integrin family4. Here we show that chemotactic dendritic cells mechanically adapt to the adhesive properties of their substrate by switching between integrin-mediated and integrin-independent locomotion. We found that on engaging the integrin–actin clutch, actin polymerization was entirely turned into protrusion, whereas on disengagement actin underwent slippage and retrograde flow. Remarkably, accelerated retrograde flow was balanced by an increased actin polymerization rate; therefore, cell shape and protrusion velocity remained constant on alternating substrates. Due to this adaptive response in polymerization dynamics, tracks of adhesive substrate did not dictate the path of the cells. Instead, directional guidance was exclusively provided by a soluble gradient of chemoattractant, which endowed these 'amoeboid' cells with extraordinary flexibility, enabling them to traverse almost every type of tissue.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Spatial and temporal dynamics of actin and myosin II in migrating dendritic cells.
Figure 2: Dendritic cells can use integrins for transmembrane force coupling, and uncoupling enhances retrograde actin flow without affecting migration.
Figure 3: Actin polymerization rate is variable in the molecular clutch system.
Figure 4: Leading edge protrusion and chemotactic movement is substrate-independent.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Charras, G. & Paluch, E. Blebs lead the way: how to migrate without lamellipodia. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 730–736 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lammermann, T. & Sixt, M. Mechanical modes of 'amoeboid' cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 636–644 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mogilner, A. On the edge: modeling protrusion. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 32–39 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mitchison, T. J. & Cramer, L. P. Actin-based cell motility and cell locomotion. Cell 84, 371–379 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lammermann, T. et al. Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing. Nature 453, 51–55 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lammermann, T. et al. Cdc42-dependent leading edge coordination is essential for interstitial dendritic cell migration. Blood 113, 5703–5710 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Riedl, J. et al. Lifeact: a versatile marker to visualize F-actin. Nature Methods 5, 605–607 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Henson, J. H. et al. Two components of actin-based retrograde flow in sea urchin coelomocytes. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 4075–4090 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Medeiros, N. A., Burnette, D. T. & Forscher, P. Myosin II functions in actin-bundle turnover in neuronal growth cones. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 215–226 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cramer, L. P. Molecular mechanism of actin-dependent retrograde flow in lamellipodia of motile cells. Front. Biosci. 2, d260–270 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Alvarez, D., Vollmann, E. H. & von Andrian, U. H. Mechanisms and consequences of dendritic cell migration. Immunity 29, 325–342 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heit, B. & Kubes, P. Measuring chemotaxis and chemokinesis: the under-agarose cell migration assay. Sci. STKE 2003, PL5 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Malawista, S. E. & de Boisfleury Chevance, A. Random locomotion and chemotaxis of human blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) in the presence of EDTA: PMN in close quarters require neither leukocyte integrins nor external divalent cations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 11577–11582 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, J., Gustafsson, M., Magnusson, K. E. & Jacobson, K. The direction of membrane lipid flow in locomoting polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Science 247, 1229–1233 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Keren, K. et al. Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells. Nature 453, 475–480 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kucik, D. F., Elson, E. L. & Sheetz, M. P. Cell migration does not produce membrane flow. J. Cell Biol. 111, 1617–1622 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sixt, M. et al. The conduit system transports soluble antigens from the afferent lymph to resident dendritic cells in the T cell area of the lymph node. Immunity 22, 19–29 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yakubenko, V. P., Lishko, V. K., Lam, S. C. & Ugarova, T. P. A molecular basis for integrin αMbeta 2 ligand binding promiscuity. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 48635–48642 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kucik, D. F., Kuo, S. C., Elson, E. L. & Sheetz, M. P. Preferential attachment of membrane glycoproteins to the cytoskeleton at the leading edge of lamella. J. Cell Biol. 114, 1029–1036 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McGrath, J. L. et al. The force-velocity relationship for the actin-based motility of Listeria monocytogenes. Curr. Biol. 13, 329–332 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Koestler, S. A. et al. F- and G-actin concentrations in lamellipodia of moving cells. PLoS One 4, e4810 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jurado, C., Haserick, J. R. & Lee, J. Slipping or gripping? Fluorescent speckle microscopy in fish keratocytes reveals two different mechanisms for generating a retrograde flow of actin. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 507–518 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin, C. H. & Forscher, P. Growth cone advance is inversely proportional to retrograde F-actin flow. Neuron 14, 763–771 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mitchison, T. & Kirschner, M. Cytoskeletal dynamics and nerve growth. Neuron 1, 761–772 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Thery, M. et al. Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 19771–19776 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lutz, M. B. et al. An advanced culture method for generating large quantities of highly pure dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow. J. Immunol. Methods 223, 77–92 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rutherford, M. S. & Schook, L. B. Differential immunocompetence of macrophages derived using macrophage or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J. Leukoc. Biol. 51, 69–76 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Blummel, J. et al. Protein repellent properties of covalently attached PEG coatings on nanostructured SiO(2)-based interfaces. Biomaterials 28, 4739–4747 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Cremer for statistical analysis, K. Hirsch for technical assistance, D. Critchley for talin1-deficient mice and R. Fässler for integrin-deficient mice, discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the German Research Foundation, the Peter Hans Hofschneider Foundation for Experimental Biomedicine, the Max Planck Society, the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and the allergology programme of the Landesstiftung Baden-Württemberg.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.R. and M.S. designed, performed and analysed experiments and wrote the manuscript. K.S., M.W., T.L. and H.P. performed experiments, M.P. contributed ideas and J.P. and J.P.S. provided passivated surfaces.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Sixt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 2878 kb)

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Movie 1 (MOV 1464 kb)

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Movie 2 (MOV 2861 kb)

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Movie 3 (MOV 2360 kb)

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Movie 4 (MOV 1369 kb)

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Movie 5 (MOV 1745 kb)

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Movie 6 (MOV 5271 kb)

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Movie 7 (MOV 2315 kb)

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Movie 8 (MOV 1493 kb)

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Movie 9 (MOV 3734 kb)

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Movie 10 (MOV 2461 kb)

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Movie 11 (MOV 3505 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Renkawitz, J., Schumann, K., Weber, M. et al. Adaptive force transmission in amoeboid cell migration. Nat Cell Biol 11, 1438–1443 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1992

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1992

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing