Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Rev-Erbs repress macrophage gene expression by inhibiting enhancer-directed transcription

Subjects

Abstract

Rev-Erb-α and Rev-Erb-β are nuclear receptors that regulate the expression of genes involved in the control of circadian rhythm1,2, metabolism3,4 and inflammatory responses5. Rev-Erbs function as transcriptional repressors by recruiting nuclear receptor co-repressor (NCoR)–HDAC3 complexes to Rev-Erb response elements in enhancers and promoters of target genes6,7,8, but the molecular basis for cell-specific programs of repression is not known. Here we present evidence that in mouse macrophages Rev-Erbs regulate target gene expression by inhibiting the functions of distal enhancers that are selected by macrophage-lineage-determining factors, thereby establishing a macrophage-specific program of repression. Remarkably, the repressive functions of Rev-Erbs are associated with their ability to inhibit the transcription of enhancer-derived RNAs (eRNAs). Furthermore, targeted degradation of eRNAs at two enhancers subject to negative regulation by Rev-Erbs resulted in reduced expression of nearby messenger RNAs, suggesting a direct role of these eRNAs in enhancer function. By precisely defining eRNA start sites using a modified form of global run-on sequencing that quantifies nascent 5′ ends, we show that transfer of full enhancer activity to a target promoter requires both the sequences mediating transcription-factor binding and the specific sequences encoding the eRNA transcript. These studies provide evidence for a direct role of eRNAs in contributing to enhancer functions and suggest that Rev-Erbs act to suppress gene expression at a distance by repressing eRNA transcription.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Rev-Erb binding and function at macrophage-specific enhancers.
Figure 2: Rev-Erb negatively regulates enhancer transcription.
Figure 3: Reduction of eRNA expression results in reduced expression of nearby mRNAs.
Figure 4: eRNA contribution to enhancer activity and consequences of knockdown in vivo.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Data deposits

Sequencing data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession GSE45914.

References

  1. Preitner, N. et al. The orphan nuclear receptor REV-ERBα controls circadian transcription within the positive limb of the mammalian circadian oscillator. Cell 110, 251–260 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, A. C. et al. Redundant function of REV-ERBα and β and non-essential role for Bmal1 cycling in transcriptional regulation of intracellular circadian rhythms. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000023 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raspé, E. et al. Identification of Rev-erbα as a physiological repressor of apoC-III gene transcription. J. Lipid Res. 43, 2172–2179 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Le Martelot, G. et al. REV-ERBα participates in circadian SREBP signaling and bile acid homeostasis. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000181 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibbs, J. E. et al. The nuclear receptor REV-ERBα mediates circadian regulation of innate immunity through selective regulation of inflammatory cytokines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 582–587 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zamir, I. et al. A nuclear hormone receptor corepressor mediates transcriptional silencing by receptors with distinct repression domains. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 5458–5465 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yin, L. & Lazar, M. A. The orphan nuclear receptor Rev-erbα recruits the N-CoR/histone deacetylase 3 corepressor to regulate the circadian Bmal1 gene. Mol. Endocrinol. 19, 1452–1459 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Feng, D. et al. A circadian rhythm orchestrated by histone deacetylase 3 controls hepatic lipid metabolism. Science 331, 1315–1319 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heintzman, N. D. et al. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature 459, 108–112 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman, A. D. Transcriptional control of granulocyte and monocyte development. Oncogene 26, 6816–6828 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Core, L. J., Waterfall, J. J. & Lis, J. T. Nascent RNA sequencing reveals widespread pausing and divergent initiation at human promoters. Science 322, 1845–1848 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schlaeger, T. M., Mikkola, H. K., Gekas, C., Helgadottir, H. B. & Orkin, S. H. Tie2Cre-mediated gene ablation defines the stem-cell leukemia gene (SCL/tal1)-dependent window during hematopoietic stem-cell development. Blood 105, 3871–3874 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Giguere, V. et al. Isoform-specific amino-terminal domains dictate DNA-binding properties of ROR alpha, a novel family of orphan hormone nuclear receptors. Genes Dev. 8, 538–553 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, T.-K. et al. Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancers. Nature 465, 182–187 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, D. et al. Reprogramming transcription by distinct classes of enhancers functionally defined by eRNA. Nature 474, 390–394 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hah, N. et al. A rapid, extensive, and transient transcriptional response to estrogen signaling in breast cancer cells. Cell 145, 622–634 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bennett, C. F. & Swayze, E. E. RNA targeting therapeutics: molecular mechanisms of antisense oligonucleotides as a therapeutic platform. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 50, 259–293 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Guang, S. et al. Small regulatory RNAs inhibit RNA polymerase II during the elongation phase of transcription. Nature 465, 1097–1101 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gu, S. G. et al. Amplification of siRNA in Caenorhabditis elegans generates a transgenerational sequence-targeted histone H3 lysine 9 methylation footprint. Nature Genet. 44, 157–164 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang, W. et al. Coronin 2A mediates actin-dependent de-repression of inflammatory response genes. Nature 470, 414–418 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lai, F. et al. Activating RNAs associate with Mediator to enhance chromatin architecture and transcription. Nature 494, 497–501 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Melo, C. A. et al. eRNAs are required for p53-dependent enhancer activity and gene transcription. Mol. Cell 49, 524–535 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Raal, F. J. et al. Mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, for lowering of LDL cholesterol concentrations in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 375, 998–1006 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cho, H. et al. Regulation of circadian behaviour and metabolism by REV-ERB-α and REV-ERB-β. Nature 485, 123–127 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Saldanha, A. J. Java Treeview—extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics 20, 3246–3248 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schanke, J. T. Sequence inversion by Flip-PCR. Methods Mol. Biol. 67, 203–208 (1997)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Baker, B. F. et al. 2′-O-(2-Methoxy)ethyl-modified anti-intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) oligonucleotides selectively increase the ICAM-1 mRNA level and inhibit formation of the ICAM-1 translation initiation complex in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11994–12000 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Seth, P. P. et al. Design, synthesis and evaluation of constrained methoxyethyl (cMOE) and constrained ethyl (cEt) nucleoside analogs. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 52, 553–554 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Bautista for assistance with figure preparation. These studies were supported by National Institutes of Health grants CA17390, U19DK62434, DK091183, DK063491, CA014195, DK057978, HL088093, HL105278 and CA52599. M.G.R. and R.M.E. are Investigators of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. M.T.Y.L. is supported by the University of California, San Diego Medical Scientist Training Program T32 GM007198-37, and Genetics Training Program T32 GM008666, National Institute of General Medical Sciences. M.U.K. was supported by a LeDucq Foundation Fellowship. H.P.L. was supported by the Finnish Cultural Foundation, Instumentarium Foundation, The Paulo Foundation, Paavo Nurmi Foundation, Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, The Maud Kuistila Memorial Foundation and The Fulbright Center. These studies were also supported by grants from the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation, the Glenn Foundation for Medical Research, the Ellison Medical Foundation and Ipsen/Biomeasure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.T.Y.L., S.H., C.B., A.W., T.R.G., M.G.R., R.M.E. and C.K.G. conceived the project and planned experiments, which were performed by M.T.Y.L., H.C., H.P.L., D.G., S.H., Y.T.-O., M.U.K., A.S.K., M.K. and C.Y.L., and analysed by M.T.Y.L., H.P.L., D.G., C.B. and C.K.G. The project was supervised by C.K.G., who wrote the manuscript with M.T.Y.L.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher K. Glass.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.S.K., A.W. and T.R.G. are employees of Isis Pharmaceuticals.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-16 and additional references. (PDF 12417 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lam, M., Cho, H., Lesch, H. et al. Rev-Erbs repress macrophage gene expression by inhibiting enhancer-directed transcription. Nature 498, 511–515 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12209

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12209

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing