Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Helical assembly in the MyD88–IRAK4–IRAK2 complex in TLR/IL-1R signalling

Abstract

MyD88, IRAK4 and IRAK2 are critical signalling mediators of the TLR/IL1-R superfamily. Here we report the crystal structure of the MyD88–IRAK4–IRAK2 death domain (DD) complex, which surprisingly reveals a left-handed helical oligomer that consists of 6 MyD88, 4 IRAK4 and 4 IRAK2 DDs. Assembly of this helical signalling tower is hierarchical, in which MyD88 recruits IRAK4 and the MyD88–IRAK4 complex recruits the IRAK4 substrates IRAK2 or the related IRAK1. Formation of these Myddosome complexes brings the kinase domains of IRAKs into proximity for phosphorylation and activation. Composite binding sites are required for recruitment of the individual DDs in the complex, which are confirmed by mutagenesis and previously identified signalling mutations. Specificities in Myddosome formation are dictated by both molecular complementarity and correspondence of surface electrostatics. The MyD88–IRAK4–IRAK2 complex provides a template for Toll signalling in Drosophila and an elegant mechanism for versatile assembly and regulation of DD complexes in signal transduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Structure of the ternary Myddosome complex.
Figure 2: Composite interactions and specificity in the ternary complex.
Figure 3: Model of sequential assembly in TLR/IL1-R signalling.
Figure 4: Common architecture in Drosophila Toll signalling and DD assembly in general.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Protein Data Bank

Data deposits

The atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession code 3MOP.

References

  1. O’Neill, L. A. The interleukin-1 receptor/Toll-like receptor superfamily: 10 years of progress. Immunol. Rev. 226, 10–18 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Takeda, K., Kaisho, T. & Akira, S. Toll-like receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21, 335–376 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Akira, S., Uematsu, S. & Takeuchi, O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 124, 783–801 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beutler, B. Inferences, questions and possibilities in Toll-like receptor signalling. Nature 430, 257–263 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Verstak, B., Hertzog, P. & Mansell, A. Toll-like receptor signalling and the clinical benefits that lie within. Inflamm. Res. 56, 1–10 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marx, J. Biomedicine. Puzzling out the pains in the gut. Science 315, 33–35 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Neill, L. A. Primer: Toll-like receptor signaling pathways–what do rheumatologists need to know? Nat. Clin. Pract. Rheumatol. 4, 319–327 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marta, M., Meier, U. C. & Lobell, A. Regulation of autoimmune encephalomyelitis by toll-like receptors. Autoimmun. Rev. 8, 506–509 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lande, R. et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells sense self-DNA coupled with antimicrobial peptide. Nature 449, 564–569 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pisitkun, P. et al. Autoreactive B cell responses to RNA-related antigens due to TLR7 gene duplication. Science 312, 1669–1672 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Horner, A. A. & Raz, E. Do microbes influence the pathogenesis of allergic diseases? Building the case for Toll-like receptor ligands. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 15, 614–619 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, R. et al. Cancers take their Toll–the function and regulation of Toll-like receptors in cancer cells. Oncogene 27, 225–233 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dasu, M. R., Devaraj, S., Park, S. & Jialal, I. Increased Toll-like receptor activation and TLR ligands in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes subjects. Diabetes Care 33, 861–868 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stewart, C. R. et al. CD36 ligands promote sterile inflammation through assembly of a Toll-like receptor 4 and 6 heterodimer. Nature Immunol. 11, 155–161 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. den Dekker, W. K., Cheng, C., Pasterkamp, G. & Duckers, H. J. Toll like receptor 4 in atherosclerosis and plaque destabilization. Atherosclerosis 209, 314–320 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Romero-Sandoval, E. A., Horvath, R. J. & DeLeo, J. A. Neuroimmune interactions and pain: focus on glial-modulating targets. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 9, 726–734 (2008)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Neill, L. A. & Bowie, A. G. The family of five: TIR-domain-containing adaptors in Toll-like receptor signalling. Nature Rev. Immunol. 7, 353–364 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dinarello, C. A. Interleukin-1, interleukin-1 receptors and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist. Int. Rev. Immunol. 16, 457–499 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kawai, T. et al. Unresponsiveness of MyD88-deficient mice to endotoxin. Immunity 11, 115–122 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dunne, A. & O’Neill, L. A. The interleukin-1 receptor/Toll-like receptor superfamily: signal transduction during inflammation and host defense. Sci. STKE 2003, re3 (2003)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bowie, A. & O’Neill, L. A. The interleukin-1 receptor/Toll-like receptor superfamily: signal generators for pro-inflammatory interleukins and microbial products. J. Leukoc. Biol. 67, 508–514 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Beutler, B. et al. Genetic analysis of host resistance: Toll-like receptor signaling and immunity at large. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 24, 353–389 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kobayashi, K. et al. IRAK-M is a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor signaling. Cell 110, 191–202 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Suzuki, N. et al. Severe impairment of interleukin-1 and Toll-like receptor signalling in mice lacking IRAK-4. Nature 416, 750–756 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kawagoe, T. et al. Sequential control of Toll-like receptor-dependent responses by IRAK1 and IRAK2. Nature Immunol. 9, 684–691 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wan, Y. et al. Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 2 is critical for lipopolysaccharide-mediated post-transcriptional control. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 10367–10375 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Picard, C. et al. Pyogenic bacterial infections in humans with IRAK-4 deficiency. Science 299, 2076–2079 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. von Bernuth, H. et al. Pyogenic bacterial infections in humans with MyD88 deficiency. Science 321, 691–696 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lasker, M. V., Gajjar, M. M. & Nair, S. K. Cutting edge: Molecular structure of the IL-1R-associated kinase-4 death domain and its implications for TLR signaling. J. Immunol. 175, 4175–4179 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Motshwene, P. G. et al. An oligomeric signaling platform formed by the Toll-like receptor signal transducers MyD88 and IRAK-4. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 25404–25411 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Park, H. H. et al. The death domain superfamily in intracellular signaling of apoptosis and inflammation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 25, 561–586 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Burns, K. et al. Inhibition of interleukin 1 receptor/Toll-like receptor signaling through the alternatively spliced, short form of MyD88 is due to its failure to recruit IRAK-4. J. Exp. Med. 197, 263–268 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Janssens, S. et al. MyD88S, a splice variant of MyD88, differentially modulates NF-κB- and AP-1-dependent gene expression. FEBS Lett. 548, 103–107 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Loiarro, M. et al. Identification of critical residues of the MyD88 death domain involved in the recruitment of downstream kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 28093–28103 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lawrence, M. C. & Colman, P. M. Shape complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 946–950 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Li, S., Strelow, A., Fontana, E. J. & Wesche, H. IRAK-4: a novel member of the IRAK family with the properties of an IRAK-kinase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5567–5572 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Szabo, G., Dolganiuc, A., Dai, Q. & Pruett, S. B. TLR4, ethanol, and lipid rafts: a new mechanism of ethanol action with implications for other receptor-mediated effects. J. Immunol. 178, 1243–1249 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rao, N., Nguyen, S., Ngo, K. & Fung-Leung, W. P. A novel splice variant of interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R)-associated kinase 1 plays a negative regulatory role in Toll/IL-1R-induced inflammatory signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 6521–6532 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hardy, M. P. & O’Neill, L. A. The murine Irak2 gene encodes four alternatively spliced isoforms, two of which are inhibitory. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 27699–27708 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Conze, D. B. et al. Lys63-linked polyubiquitination of IRAK-1 is required for interleukin-1 receptor- and toll-like receptor-mediated NF-κB activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 3538–3547 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Cao, Z. et al. TRAF6 is a signal transducer for interleukin-1. Nature 383, 443–446 (1996)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Belvin, M. P. & Anderson, K. V. A conserved signaling pathway: the Drosophila Toll-Dorsal pathway. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 393–416 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sun, H., Bristow, B. N., Qu, G. & Wasserman, S. A. A heterotrimeric death domain complex in Toll signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12871–12876 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Towb, P., Huaiyu, S. & Wasserman, S. A. Tube is an IRAK-4 homolog in a Toll pathway adapted for development and immunity. J. Innate Immun. 1, 309–321 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Holm, L. & Sander, C. Dali: a network tool for protein structure comparison. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 478–480 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Moncrieffe, M. C., Grossmann, J. G. & Gay, N. J. Assembly of oligomeric death domain complexes during Toll receptor signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 33447–33454 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Xiao, T., Towb, P., Wasserman, S. A. & Sprang, S. R. Three-dimensional structure of a complex between the death domains of Pelle and Tube. Cell 99, 545–555 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Sun, H. et al. Regulated assembly of the Toll signaling complex drives Drosophila dorsoventral patterning. EMBO J. 23, 100–110 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Park, H. H. et al. Death domain assembly mechanism revealed by crystal structure of the oligomeric PIDDosome core complex. Cell 128, 533–546 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Egelman, E. H. Single-particle reconstruction from EM images of helical filaments. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17, 556–561 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Terwilliger, T. SOLVE and RESOLVE: automated structure solution, density modification and model building. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 11, 49–52 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Brunger, A. T. et al. Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 54, 905–921 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 58, 1948–1954 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Collaborative Computational Project. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 50, 760–763 (1994)

  57. Reynolds, C., Damerell, D. & Jones, S. ProtorP: a protein–protein interaction analysis server. Bioinformatics 25, 413–414 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Delano, W. L. The PyMol Molecular Graphics System 〈http://www.pymol.org/〉 (2002)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Rajashankar, I. Kourinov and N. Sukumar for data collection and X. Ma for help with the manuscript. This work was supported by NIH (H.W.), the Cancer Research Institute (S.-C.L. and Y.-C.L.), and the American Heart Association (Y.-C.L.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.W. initiated the project idea. S.-C.L. and Y.-C.L. designed and performed the experiments. S.-C.L. and H.W. interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Tables 1-4, Supplementary Figures 1-11 with legends and Supplementary Discussions 1-2. (PDF 10353 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, SC., Lo, YC. & Wu, H. Helical assembly in the MyD88–IRAK4–IRAK2 complex in TLR/IL-1R signalling. Nature 465, 885–890 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09121

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09121

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing