Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina

Abstract

Nuclear compartmentalization seems to have an important role in regulating metazoan genes1,2. Although studies on immunoglobulin and other loci have shown a correlation between positioning at the nuclear lamina and gene repression, the functional consequences of this compartmentalization remain untested2,3. We devised an approach for inducible tethering of genes to the inner nuclear membrane (INM), and tested the consequences of such repositioning on gene activity in mouse fibroblasts. Here, using three-dimensional DNA-immunoFISH, we demonstrate repositioning of chromosomal regions to the nuclear lamina that is dependent on breakdown and reformation of the nuclear envelope during mitosis. Moreover, tethering leads to the accumulation of lamin and INM proteins, but not to association with pericentromeric heterochromatin or nuclear pore complexes. Recruitment of genes to the INM can result in their transcriptional repression. Finally, we use targeted adenine methylation (DamID) to show that, as is the case for our model system, inactive immunoglobulin loci at the nuclear periphery are contacted by INM and lamina proteins. We propose that these molecular interactions may be used to compartmentalize and to limit the accessibility of immunoglobulin loci to transcription and recombination factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Quantitative analysis of tethered loci by 3D DNA-immunoFISH.
Figure 2: Lamin B, EMD and LAP2, but not NPCs, accumulate at sites of tethered foci.
Figure 3: Tethering leads to transcriptional repression and histone deacetylation of genes at site of attachment to the INM.
Figure 4: Inactive immunoglobulin heavy chain loci that are positioned at the nuclear periphery contact the nuclear lamina.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Data deposits

The microarray data can be found at the Gene Expression Omnibus at NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/geo/) under accession number GSE10176.

References

  1. Lanctot, C., Cheutin, T., Cremer, M., Cavalli, G. & Cremer, T. Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 104–115 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Misteli, T. Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell 128, 787–800 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kosak, S. T. et al. Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development. Science 296, 158–162 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hewitt, S. L., High, F. A., Reiner, S. L., Fisher, A. G. & Merkenschlager, M. Nuclear repositioning marks the selective exclusion of lineage-inappropriate transcription factor loci during T helper cell differentiation. Eur. J. Immunol. 34, 3604–3613 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zink, D. et al. Transcription-dependent spatial arrangements of CFTR and adjacent genes in human cell nuclei. J. Cell Biol. 166, 815–825 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chuang, C.-H. et al. Long-range directional movement of an interphase chromosome site. Curr. Biol. 16, 825–831 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams, R. R. et al. Neural induction promotes large-scale chromatin reorganisation of the Mash1 locus. J. Cell Sci. 119, 132–140 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Andrulis, E. D., Neiman, A. M., Zappulla, D. C. & Sternglanz, R. Perinuclear localization of chromatin facilitates transcriptional silencing. Nature 394, 592–595 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Taddei, A. et al. Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene. Nature 441, 774–778 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmid, M. et al. Nup-PI: The nucleopore–promoter interaction of genes in yeast. Mol. Cell 21, 379–391 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shaklai, S., Amariglio, N., Rechavi, G. & Simon, A. J. Gene silencing at the nuclear periphery. FEBS J. 274, 1383–1392 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Somech, R. et al. The nuclear-envelope protein and transcriptional repressor LAP2β interacts with HDAC3 at the nuclear periphery, and induces histone H4 deacetylation. J. Cell Sci. 118, 4017–4025 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Holaska, J. M., Lee, K. K., Kowalski, A. K. & Wilson, K. L. Transcriptional repressor germ cell-less (GCL) and barrier to autointegration factor (BAF) compete for binding to emerin in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 6969–6975 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Polioudaki, H. et al. Histones H3/H4 form a tight complex with the inner nuclear membrane protein LBR and heterochromatin protein 1. EMBO Rep. 2, 920–925 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Belmont, A. S., Li, G., Sudlow, G. & Robinett, C. Visualization of large-scale chromatin structure and dynamics using the lac operator/lac repressor reporter system. Methods Cell Biol. 58, 203–222 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsuchiya, Y., Hase, A., Ogawa, M., Yorifuji, H. & Arahata, K. Distinct regions specify the nuclear membrane targeting of emerin, the responsible protein for Emery–Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Eur. J. Biochem. 259, 859–865 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, Q., Riblet, R. & Schildkraut, C. L. Sites that direct nuclear compartmentalization are near the 5′ end of the mouse immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 6021–6030 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vogel, M. J., Peric-Hupkes, D. & van Steensel, B. Detection of in vivo protein–DNA interactions using DamID in mammalian cells. Nature Protocols 2, 1467–1478 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bengtsson, L. & Wilson, K. L. Multiple and surprising new functions for emerin, a nuclear membrane protein. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 73–79 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pickersgill, H. et al. Characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster genome at the nuclear lamina. Nature Genet. 38, 1005–1014 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bertolino, E. et al. Regulation of interleukin 7-dependent immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable gene rearrangements by transcription factor STAT5. Nature Immunol. 6, 836–843 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson, K., Angelin-Duclos, C., Park, S. & Calame, K. L. Changes in histone acetylation are associated with differences in accessibility of VH gene segments to V–DJ recombination during B-cell ontogeny and development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 2438–2450 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pawlitzky, I. et al. Identification of a candidate regulatory element within the 5′ flanking region of the mouse Igh locus defined by pro-B cell-specific hypersensitivity associated with binding of PU.1, Pax5, and E2A. J. Immunol. 176, 6839–6851 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ragoczy, T., Bender, M. A., Telling, A., Byron, R. & Groudine, M. The locus control region is required for association of the murine beta-globin locus with engaged transcription factories during erythroid maturation. Genes Dev. 20, 1447–1457 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mendjan, S. et al. Nuclear pore components are involved in the transcriptional regulation of dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 21, 811–823 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, S. H. et al. Spatial genome organization during T-cell differentiation. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 105, 292–301 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Solovei, I. et al. Spatial preservation of nuclear chromatin architecture during three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization (3D-FISH). Exp. Cell Res. 276, 10–23 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jolly, C., Mongelard, F., Robert-Nicoud, M. & Vourc’h, V. Optimization of nuclear transcript detection by FISH and combination with fluorescence immunocytochemical detection of transcription factors. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 45, 1585–1592 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Belmont for the lacO and GFP-LacI plasmids and K. Van Steensel for DamID plasmids. We are grateful to members of the laboratory for critical input and support by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. J.M.Z. is supported by an NIH training grant.

Author Contributions K.L.R. designed and performed most of the experiments. J.M.Z. carried out the DamID experiments with K.L.R.. E.B. contributed the microarray analysis. K.L.R. and H.S. wrote the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Singh.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

The file contains Supplementary Figures S1-S7 with Legends, Supplementary Methods and additional references. (PDF 1576 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reddy, K., Zullo, J., Bertolino, E. et al. Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 452, 243–247 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06727

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06727

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing