Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Machaeridians are Palaeozoic armoured annelids

Abstract

The systematic affinities of several Palaeozoic skeletal taxa were only resolved when their soft-tissue morphology was revealed by the discovery of exceptionally preserved specimens. The conodonts provide a classic example, their tooth-like elements having been assigned to various invertebrate and vertebrate groups for more than 125 years until the discovery of their soft tissues revealed them to be crown-group vertebrates1. Machaeridians, which are virtually ubiquitous as shell plates in benthic marine shelly assemblages ranging from Early Ordovician (Late Tremadoc) to Carboniferous2, have proved no less enigmatic. The Machaeridia comprise three distinct families of worm-like animals, united by the possession of a dorsal skeleton of calcite plates that is rarely found articulated. Since they were first described 150 years ago3 machaeridians have been allied with barnacles4,5, echinoderms6,7, molluscs3,8,9,10 or annelids9,11,12. Here we describe a new machaeridian with preserved soft parts, including parapodia and chaetae, from the Upper Tremadoc of Morocco, demonstrating the annelid affinity of the group. This discovery shows that a lineage of annelids evolved a dorsal skeleton of calcareous plates early in their history; it also resolves the affinities of a group of problematic Palaeozoic invertebrates previously known only from isolated elements and occasional skeletal assemblages.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Plumulites bengtsoni sp. nov. from the upper part of the Lower Fezouata formation, Lower Ordovician (Upper Tremadoc), Morocco.
Figure 2: Details of the parapodia, chaetae and dorsal integumental extensions of P. bengtsoni , holotype YPM 221134, part.
Figure 3: Plumulites tafennaensis 16 from the Upper Ordovician (Caradoc), Morocco.
Figure 4: Strict consensus tree of 66 most parsimonious trees based on a cladistic analysis with 23 taxa and 57 characters (Supplementary Information and Supplementary Fig. 4).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Briggs, D. E. G. Conodonts – a major extinct group added to the vertebrates. Science 256, 1285–1286 (1992)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Adrain, J. M. Machaeridian classification. Alcheringa 16, 15–32 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Koninck, L. Sur deux nouvelles espèces siluriennes appartenant au genre Chiton . Bull. Acad. r. Belg. 3, 190–199 (1857)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Woodward, H. On the discovery of a new genus of Cirripedia in the Wenlock limestone and shale of Dudley. Q. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 21, 486–489 (1865)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bischoff, G. C. O. Dalyatia, a new genus of the Tommotidae from the Cambrian strata of S. E. Australia (Crustacea, Cirripedia). Senck. Leth. 57, 1–33 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Withers, T. H. Catalogue of the Machaeridia 1–99 (British Museum, Natural History, London, 1926)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pope, J. K. Evidence for relating the Lepidocoleidae, machaeridian echinoderms, to the mitrate carpoids. Bull. Am. Paleont. 67, 385–406 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wolburg, J. Beitrag zum Problem der Machaeridia. Paläont. Z. 20, 289–298 (1938)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dzik, J. in Problematic Fossil Taxa (eds Hoffman, A. & Nitecki, M. H.) 116–134 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sigwart, J. D. & Sutton, M. D. Deep molluscan phylogeny: synthesis of palaeontological and neontological data. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 2413–2419 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bengtson, S. The Lower Cambrian fossil Tommotia . Lethaia 3, 363–392 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jell, P. A. Plumulites and the machaeridian problem. Alcheringa 3, 253–259 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Destombes, J., Hollard, H. & Willefert, S. in Lower Palaeozoic Rocks of the World Vol. 4, Lower Palaeozoic of North-western and West-central Africa (ed. Holland, C. H.) 91–336 (John Wiley, Chichester, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kobayashi, T. & Hamada, T. Occurrences of the Machaeridia in Japan and Malaysia. Proc. Jap. Acad. 52, 371–374 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Adrain, J. M., Chatterton, B. D. E. & Cocks, L. R. M. A new species of machaeridian from the Silurian of Podolia, USSR, with a review of the Turrilepadidae. Palaeontology 34, 637–651 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chauvel, J. Sur quelques représentants du genre Plumulites Barrande (Machaeridiés) provenant de l’Ordovicien du Maroc et du Massif Armoricain. Bull. Soc. Géol. Miner. Bretagne 1966, 73–85 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schrank, E. Machaeridia aus Silurischen Geschieben. Der Geschiebesammler 11, 5–22 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hints, O., Eriksson, M., Högström, A. E. S., Kraft, P. & Lehnert, O. in The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (eds Webby, B., Paris, F., Droser, M. L. & Percival, I. G.) 223–230 (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rouse, G. & Pleijel, F. Polychaetes (Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Westheide, W. The direction of evolution within the Polychaeta. J. Nat. Hist. 31, 1–15 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hints, O. & Eriksson, M. Diversification and biogeography of scolecodont-bearing polychaetes in the Ordovician. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 245, 95–114 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bartels, C., Briggs, D. E. G. & Brassel, G. The Fossils of the Hunsrück Slate, Marine Life in the Devonian (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Farrell, Ú. C. & Briggs, D. E. G. A pyritized polychaete from the Devonian of Ontario. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 499–504 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Alessandrello, A., Bracchi, G. & Riou, B. Polychaete, sipunculan and enteropneust worms from the Lower Callovian (Middle Jurassic) of La Voulte-sur-Rhône (Ardèche, France). Mem. Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. Mus. Civ. Storia Nat. Milano 32, 1–16 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Eibye-Jacobsen, D. A reevaluation of Wiwaxia and the polychaetes of the Burgess Shale. Lethaia 37, 317–335 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Conway Morris, S. & Peel, J. S. Articulated halkieriids from the Lower Cambrian of north Greenland and their role in early protostome evolution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 347, 305–358 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Evans, K. R. & Rowell, A. J. Small shelly fossils from Antarctica: an Early Cambrian faunal connection with Australia. J. Paleont. 64, 692–700 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, G. & Xiao, S. Tannuolina and Micrina (Tannuolinidae) from the Lower Cambrian of Eastern Yunnan, south China, and their scleritome reconstruction. J. Paleont. 78, 900–913 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Holmer, L. E., Skovsted, C. B. & Williams, A. A stem group brachiopod from the Lower Cambrian: support for a Micrina (halkieriid) ancestry. Palaeontology 45, 875–882 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bengtson, S. The Machaeridia – a square peg in a pentagonal hole. Thallasia Jugoslav. 12, 1–10 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

S. Bengtson, D. Eibye-Jacobsen and K. J. Peterson commented on the manuscript and cladistic analysis. T. A. Hegna and A. Seilacher are thanked for discussions. E. Lazo-Wasem and C. MacClintock provided access to annelid and machaeridian specimens from the collections of the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History. Specimen YPM 221134 was provided by M. Ben Said Ben Moula, and YPM 220639 by R. Reboul and V. Reboul. These last three persons, with W. De Winter, B. MacGabhann, B. Van Bocxlaer and D. Van Damme, assisted with fieldwork.

Author Contributions P.V.R. performed field work and acquired the specimens. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the fossils and writing the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek E. G. Briggs.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

The file contains Supplementary Notes, Supplementary Table, Supplementary Figures S1-S4 with Legends and additional references. (PDF 8529 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vinther, J., Van Roy, P. & Briggs, D. Machaeridians are Palaeozoic armoured annelids. Nature 451, 185–188 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06474

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06474

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing