Letters to Nature
Nature 432, 218-222 (11 November 2004) | doi:10.1038/nature02949; Received 8 June 2004; Accepted 18 August 2004
A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp
Elizabeth A. Tibbetts1,3 and James Dale2
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA and Center for Insect Sciences & Division of Neurobiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
- Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
- Present address: Center for Insect Sciences & Division of Neurobiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
Correspondence to: Elizabeth A. Tibbetts1,3 Email: eat11@email.arizona.edu
Organisms use signals of quality to communicate information about aspects of their relative phenotypic and genetic constitution1, 2, 3, 4. Badges of status5, 6, 7 are a subset of signals of quality that reveal information about an individual's size and dominance. In general, signals of quality require high and differential costs to remain honest1, 2 (that is, prevent low-quality cheaters from exploiting any fitness benefits associated with communicating high quality). The theoretically required costs for badges of status remain controversial because the development (or 'production') of such signals often seems to be relatively cost-free5, 6, 8. One important hypothesis is that such signals impose social (or 'maintenance') costs incurred through repeated agonistic interactions with other individuals9, 10, 11, 12. However, convincing empirical evidence for social costs remains elusive6, 7. Here we report social costs in a previously undescribed badge of status: the highly variable black facial patterns of female paper wasps, Polistes dominulus. Facial patterns strongly predict body size and social dominance. Moreover, in staged contests between pairs of unfamiliar wasps, subordinate wasps with experimentally altered facial features ('cheaters') received considerably more aggression from the dominant than did sham controls, indicating that facial patterns are signals and that dishonest signalling imposes social costs.
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Animal behaviour Rank crime and punishmentNature News and Views (11 Nov 2004)
Animal behaviour Rank crime and punishmentNature News and Views (11 Nov 2004)
RESEARCH
A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper waspNature Letters to Editor (11 Nov 2004)
Unrelated helpers in a social insectNature Letters to Editor (15 Jun 2000)
Social contracts in wasp societiesNature Letters to Editor (29 Oct 1992)
