Introduction

Natural killer (NK) cells have a crucial role through cytotoxicity and by producing inflammatory cytokines during influenza infection.1, 2 However, their unique abilities in promoting tracheal and bronchial epithelial cell regeneration in the lung are not fully understood. Infection with influenza virus causes a high degree of morbidity and mortality.3 Influenza infection leads to necrotizing bronchiolitis, diffuse alveolar damage, alveolar hemorrhage, and airway obliteration by severe epithelial cell destruction in human lung.4 In particular, by primarily targeting human tracheal and apical bronchial epithelial cells,5 influenza virus severely damages these epithelial layers in the lungs of mouse6 and human.4 More importantly, destruction of epithelia by influenza virus and a lack of repair of this monolayer greatly augment susceptibility to secondary bacterial infections such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, leading to increased morbidity and mortality.7 Thus, determining the factors involved in epithelial cell regeneration is of high clinical significance. Epithelial cells express multiple cytokine receptors such as interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R),8 IL-2R,9 IL-4R,10 IL-6R,11 IL-9R,12 IL-11R,13, 14 IL-13R,15 CD120,8 and IL-22R.16 Among these, IL-22R and its ligand, IL-22, have been shown to have a central role in the maintenance and homeostasis of gut epithelial cells.17 Irrespective of these findings, their role in the regeneration of tracheal and bronchial epithelial cells has not been defined. Moreover, the ability of “conventional” NK cell-derived IL-22 in epithelial cell regeneration during influenza infection has not been explored.

Various T-cell subsets,18 lymphoid tissue-inducer (LTi)19 cells, γδTCR+ T cells,20 and a subset of “NK-like” cells21, 22, 23, 24 produce IL-22. The ability of conventional NK cells to produce IL-22 is contested. Both NK-like cells and “conventional” NK cells constitutively express NCR1, also known as Nkp46, but differ in their ability to express NK1.1, CD127, and transcription factor RORγt. Conventional NK cells express abundant NK1.1 and do not express CD127 or RORγt. However, the gut-resident CD3NCR1+ NK-like cells are negative for NK1.1 and constitutively produce IL-22.21 These NK-like cells express IL-7 receptor α-chain, CD127, and their development strictly depends on IL-7, but not on IL-15.25 Furthermore, unlike conventional NK cells, NK-like cells express and depend on RORγt for their development.19, 24 In addition, the NK-like cells are NKG2D+, NKG2A+, c-Kit+, CD11b, Ly49Low CD122Low, and CD69+ (reviewed in Colonna).26

In this study, using mouse-adopted human influenza virus A/PR8/34 (PR8, H1N1), we found that conventional NK cells are fully capable of producing IL-22 in the lungs. More importantly, the conventional NK cells (CD3NCR1+NK1.1+CD127RORγt) are the predominant IL-22-producing cell type in the lungs of the infected mice and have a crucial role in the regeneration of tracheal and bronchial epithelial cells. In contrast to the gut, lung tissue contained negligible numbers of IL-22-producing “NK-like” (CD3NCR1+NK1.1CD127+RORγt+) cells. We found that influenza infection led to severe destruction of tracheal epithelial cells on days post infection (DPI) 4. The tracheal epithelial cells fully regenerated by DPI 15, which was dependent on the production of IL-22 from conventional NK cells. We further show that mice lacking IL-22 display a severe impairment in their ability to regenerate tracheal and bronchial epithelial cells during influenza infection. Adoptive transfer of lung-derived IL-22-sufficient but not IL-22-deficient NK cells into IL-22−/− mice restored the regeneration of tracheal and bronchial epithelial cells. IL-22-sufficient but not IL-22-deficient NK cells also significantly reduced the inflammation in the lung, caused by influenza infection. Further, we found an IL-22-independent effect of donor NK cells in preventing severe weight loss during infection. These findings demonstrate for the first time that conventional NK cell-derived pro-constructive cytokine IL-22 has a crucial role in the regeneration of epithelial cell layers during influenza infections.

Results

Influenza virus infection causes significant destruction of tracheal epithelial cells

The upper respiratory tract, particularly the tracheal epithelial cells, is susceptible to influenza virus infection.6, 27 To determine the severity of the epithelial cell destruction in vivo, wild-type (WT) mice were infected intranasally with PR8 virus at a sub-lethal dose of 5,000 plaque-forming unit.28 This dose was selected as it led to significant levels of tracheal epithelial cell damage with minimal mortality in the WT mice. Although there was significant weight loss in these mice, most of them fully regained their normal body weight by DPI 15. As the epithelial cells in the trachea are the primary targets of the PR8 virus, we first assessed the degree of tracheal epithelial cell damage during influenza infections. Toward this, we stained tracheal sections from the infected mice with E-Cadherin, which is preferentially expressed by epithelial cells, and Annexin-V to visualize the level of cell death. Tracheal sections from DPI 0 (Figure 1a) contained a continuous monolayer of columnar epithelial cells and an intact basement membrane above the cartilaginous structure. Influenza infection, however, led to the destruction of the tracheal epithelial cell barrier on DPI 4 and this resulted in the disorganization of the epithelia. This layer was strongly positive for Annexin-V on DPI 4, indicating that the infected epithelial cells were undergoing cell death, and the lumen side of the trachea lost its columnar structure (Figure 1a). However, the epithelial cell layer started to recover and fewer Annexin-V-positive cells were seen on DPI 7 and DPI 10 (Figure 1a). Similarly, E-Cadherin-positive alveolar epithelial cells also underwent cell death in the apical lobe of the infected lungs (Supplementary Figure S1 online).

Figure 1
figure 1

Tracheal epithelial cell death correlates with influenza viral titer. (a) Tracheal sections from PR8-infected mice were stained with anti-E-Cadherin (E-Cad, epithelial cells, blue), Annexin-V (Anxn-V, apoptotic cells, red) and are shown with differential interference contrast (DIC) images. Data shown are one set of representative panels from a group of five mice infected with PR8 for each days post infection (DPI) and from a total of three different experiments. (b) Levels of PR8 viral titers were quantified using a novel infrared (IR) dye-based assay.29 Madin–Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells were incubated with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids from PR8-infected mice for 16 h. Nucleoprotein (NP) of influenza virus was detected in the infected MDCK cells using monoclonal anti-NP antibody. BAL fluids from five infected mice for each DPI were collected and analyzed, and data from one representative of five independent experiments are shown. (c) Influenza viral titers were quantified through a IR-dye based method using a standard curve. Data shown are averages of plaque-forming unit (PFU) from duplicate wells and a representative of five independent experiments. IgG, immunoglobulin G; mAb, monoclonal antibody.

PowerPoint slide

Using an infrared dye detection method developed in our laboratory,29 we also quantified the PR8 viral titers in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids of virus-infected mice using anti-nucleoprotein antibody (Figure 1b and c). Madin–Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells were incubated with the BAL fluid or PR8 with known concentrations. The levels of virus-derived nucleoprotein protein were quantified using infrared dye-conjugated antibody as a measure of viral titers (Figure 1b).29 Our results show that the PR8 titer peaked on DPI 4, concurrent with the highest level of tracheal epithelial cell damage observed (Figure 1c). On the basis of these results, we conclude that in the early phase of infection, PR8 virus causes severe damage to the tracheal epithelium.

NCR1+ cells are the predominant producers of IL-22 in the BAL, lung, and spleen

IL-22 induces epithelial cell proliferation and innate defense mechanisms including the production of anti-bacterial peptides from epithelial cells.17, 30 Earlier studies have shown that NK-like22, 24, 31 αβTCR+ T32 or γδTCR+ T20, 33, 34, 35 cells can generate IL-22. Therefore, to determine the independent contributions of these cell types, we next investigated the absolute numbers and the percentages of IL-22-producing CD3+ T, CD3+CD4+ T, CD3+CD8+ T, CD3+γδTCR+ T, CD3CD4+ LTi-like, and NCR1+ cells in BAL, lung tissue, and spleen of influenza-infected mice on DPI 7 (Figure 2a and b). Our data indicate that both NCR1+ and CD3+ T cells generate IL-22 in BAL and lung tissue. However, the absolute numbers and the percentages of IL-22+ NCR1+ cells were significantly higher compared with that of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells in these tissues (Figure 2b). Indeed our data indicate these NCR1+ cells can traffic into the trachea (Supplementary Figure S2A online). Irrespective of the higher absolute numbers of CD4+ or CD8+ T compared with NCR1+ cells, the absolute number of IL-22-producing NCR1+ cells was significantly higher in both BAL and lung tissue (Figure 2b). As recent studies have shown that the γδTCR+ T cells also produce IL-22 under pathological conditions,20 we compared these cells with NCR1+ cells. Although we could detect considerable numbers of γδTCR+ T cells in the BAL, lung tissue, and spleen, their absolute numbers and ability in terms of IL-22 production remained significantly lower compared with NCR1+ cells (Figure 2a and b).

Figure 2
figure 2

NCR1+ cells predominantly generate interleukin-22 (IL-22) in the lung during influenza infections. (a) Single-cell suspensions from indicated organs of infected mice were stained with anti-CD3, anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-γδTCR, anti-NCR1, and anti-IL-22 antibodies and analyzed through flow cytometry to define the cell populations that are positive for intracellular IL-22. Dot plots of IL-22+ cells among CD3+CD4+ T, CD3+CD8+ T, CD3+γδTCR+ T and CD3NCR1+ cells are shown. Data shown in (a) are one representative of six mice analyzed on days post infection (DPI) 7. (b) Absolute numbers and percentages of total and IL-22+ cell types based on CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+, CD3+γδTCR+ T, or NCR1+ gating in various organs on DPI 7. Data shown in (b) are averages and s.d. of six mice each and one of three independent experiments. Asterisks in (b) denote: *P<0.05. BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage.

PowerPoint slide

We also tested the presence of CD3CD4+ LTi-like cells in the BAL, lung tissue, and spleens of infected mice and found their absolute numbers are considerably negligible compared with that of NCR1+ cells (Supplementary Figure S2B online). On the basis of these findings, we conclude that a population of NCR1+ cells has a central role in the production of IL-22 during influenza infection. Analyses of NCR1+ cells in different organs of non-challenged WT mice indicate the existence of considerable numbers of NCR1+ cells in all the organs tested (Supplementary Figure S3A online), where the lung tissue contained the maximal percentage of these cells (5–10%). After PR8 infection, the absolute numbers of overall cell, lymphocyte, and NCR1+ cell numbers were significantly increased in the lung tissues (Supplementary Figure S3B online). In contrast, a continuous and significant decrease in the total lymphocytes and NCR1+ NK cell numbers was observed in the spleen with progression of the disease (Supplementary Figure S3B online).

IL-22-producing NCR1+ cells in the lungs are conventional NK cells

As both conventional NK and NK-like cells express NCR1, we next determined the identity of the IL-22-producing cells in the lungs of influenza-infected mice. Therefore, to determine phenotypic identity of these cells, we analyzed the expression of NCR1, NK1.1, and CD127. Our data indicate that majority of NCR1+ cells in the lung tissue and spleen are NK1.1+ and CD127 (Supplementary Figure S3C online). To determine which one of these subsets produce IL-22, single-cell suspensions of lung tissue and spleen from infected WT mice were prepared on the indicated DPI and stained for CD3, NCR1, NK1.1, and CD127, along with intracellular IL-22 (Figure 3a and b). CD3NCR1+ cells were gated and analyzed for NK1.1 and IL-22 or CD127 and IL-22 in ex vivo analysis. Only a negligible number of NCR1+ cells from the lung tissue produced IL-22 on DPI 0 (Figure 3a). However, a significant number of NCR1+ cells were constitutively positive for IL-22 in the spleen on DPI 0. The majority of the IL-22-generating NCR1+ subset in lung tissue were NK1.1+ and, more importantly, they were negative for CD127 (Figure 3a and c). Similar to lung, IL-22-producing NCR1+ cells in the spleen were positive for NK1.1 and negative for CD127 (Figure 3b and d). In line with these results, the IL-22+ NCR1+ cells present in the trachea were NK1.1+ and their number peaked on DPI 4 and DPI 7 (Figure 3e and f). The specificity of IL-22 staining was confirmed using an isotype control antibody that did not result in any detectable positive cells in the same experiment (Figure 3a and b, bottom panels). During influenza infection, although no differences in the percentages of IL-22-producing cells were detected (except on DPI 10), the absolute numbers of total lymphocytes, NCR1+ cells, and other subsets were significantly reduced in the spleen (Figure 3b and d).

Figure 3
figure 3

Interleukin-22 (IL-22)-producing NCR1+ cells in the influenza-infected lungs are conventional natural killer (NK) cells. Phenotypes of IL-22-generating NCR1+ cells and their absolute numbers are shown. Flow cytometry analyses of IL-22+ cells from (a) lung tissue or (b) spleen from mice at different days post infection (DPI) are shown. Single-cell suspensions were stained for CD3, NCR1, NK1.1, CD127, and intracellular IL-22. CD3NCR1+ cells were gated and analyzed for IL-22/isotype and NK1.1 or IL-22/isotype and CD127. Individual dot plots (a, b) or average absolute numbers (c, d) of IL-22-producing NCR1+ cells are shown. Data shown are one representative (a, b) and average absolute numbers with standard deviations (c, d) of five mice for each DPI. Data shown in a and b are from one representative of three independent experiments. (e) Absolute numbers of total and (f) IL-22+NCR1+NK1.1+ cells on indicated DPI in the trachea of infected mice. Cell numbers were calculated and shown per 10,000 total lymphocytes. Data shown in e, f are the averages with s.d. of six mice each from three independent experiments. Asterisks in (c–f) denote: *P<0.01 and **P<0.001.

PowerPoint slide

We next investigated the expression of RORγt (anti-RORγt monoclonal antibody, clone AFKJS-9) in CD3NCR1+ cells in the lung and spleen of infected mice. CD3NCR1+ were gated and analyzed for the expression of NK1.1 and intracellular RORγt. Interestingly, no significant RORγt positivity could be seen in the lung tissue of these mice; however, a small percentage of (3–4%) of CD3NCR1+ become RORγt-positive in the spleen of infected mice (Supplementary Figure S4A online). We also did observe an increase in the RORγt+ cells that were prominently NCR1 in the spleen and to a lesser extent in the lung tissue (Supplementary Figure S4B online). This demonstrates that the assay conditions were optimal and that the NCR1+NK1.1+ cells are not RORγt-positive in the infected lungs. To further validate our findings, we used a second RORγt-specific monoclonal antibody that is derived from hybridoma clone B2D in these assays. Results using B2D confirmed that the majority of the NCR1+NK1.1+ cells in the infected lungs were RORγt-negative (Supplementary Figure S4C and D online). As described by earlier studies,19, 21 we have found that lamina propria lymphocytes-derived cells contain significant numbers of RORγt+ cells (data not shown). Therefore, our results indicate that the IL-22-producing, lung-derived NCR1+ cells are distinct from that of the gut in NK1.1, CD127, and RORγt expressions. On the basis of these studies, we conclude that the majority of the IL-22-producing NCR1+ cells in the lung during influenza infection are conventional NK cells.

To further define the developmental requirement of NCR1+ cells in the lungs of the influenza-infected mice, we examined their absolute numbers in IL-15Rα−/− mice. IL-15 and IL-7 are two crucial cytokines that have an important role in the development of different NK subsets.25, 36 Lack of IL-15 severely reduces the number of conventional NK cells.25 However, its absence did not affect the development of the gut-resident NK-like (NCR1+NK1.1CD127+RORγt+) subset.25 To investigate the cytokine requirements of the lung-derived conventional NK cells (NCR1+NK1.1+RORγt), we used IL-15Rα−/− mice. As described earlier,37 lack of IL-15Rα did not affect the total cell counts or absolute lymphocyte numbers in the lung or spleen (Supplementary Figure S5A online). However, the absolute numbers and percentages of CD3NCR1+ cells were significantly reduced in the lung, mesenteric lymph node, and spleen, but not in the lamina propria lymphocyte (Supplementary Figure S5A and B online). In addition, the absolute numbers of conventional NK cells (NCR1+NK1.1+CD127) in the lung and spleen of IL-15Rα−/− mice were significantly reduced as compared with those of WT littermates (Supplementary Figure S5C online). On the basis of these results, we conclude that the IL-22-producing, NCR1+ conventional NK cells in the lung depend on IL-15 for their development. In addition, we found induction of abundant expression of IL-23R in these lung-derived conventional NK cells, which provides a possible mechanism by which IL-22 production is induced in these cells (Supplementary Figure S5D online).

Lack of IL-22 results in persistent tracheal damage and reduced epithelial cell proliferation

To further validate the role of IL-22 in tracheal epithelial cell regeneration, we infected the WT and IL-22−/− mice with PR8. NK cells develop normally in IL-22−/− mice and their absolute numbers were comparable to that of WT (data not shown). Lungs, along with trachea, from the infected mice were removed on different DPI, mounted, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and analyzed for the extent of epithelial cell damage. To statistically evaluate the loss of epithelial cell layers, we used a single cartilage length as one unit (100%) and calculated the percent epithelial layer loss on different DPI (Supplementary Figure S6 online). Using this method, tracheal epithelial cell loss was measured in WT and IL-22−/− mice for each DPI. Data presented in Supplementary Figure S7 online (top panels) demonstrate that significant loss of epithelial layer occurred on DPI 4 in the WT mice. In these infected mice, the epithelial layer started to recover on DPI 7 and the damage was progressively reduced (Supplementary Figure S7A and B online). Tracheal sections from DPI 7 and DPI 10 show substantial regrowth and recovery of the epithelial cell layer. However, in contrast to WT mice, IL-22−/− mice failed to regenerate their epithelial layers by DPI 15 (Supplementary Figure S7A and B online). Moreover, the damaged mature epithelial cells were largely replaced by a single stratified layer of atypical cells (flat epithelial atypia) at later DPI (Supplementary Figure S7A online, middle panels). Statistical analyses of tracheal damage per cartilage length revealed that the lack of IL-22 significantly reduced the regenerative potentials of epithelial cells in the IL-22−/− mice compared with that of WT (Supplementary Figure S7B online). In addition to the tracheal epithelial cells, the PR8 infection led to significant alterations in the lung tissue. Histopathological analyses of lung tissues from the infected WT and IL-22−/− mice showed severe bronchiolitis with perivasculitis, alveolitis, and increased leukocyte infiltrations (arrowheads, Supplementary Figure S8 online).

Our study shows that influenza infections result in extensive epithelial cell damage. In turn, remaining uninfected epithelial cells proliferate to repair damage. Therefore, we next analyzed the expression of IL-22R and the rate of proliferation in IL-22−/− mice at different DPI. Toward this, tracheal sections were analyzed for the expression of IL-22R and the proliferation marker Ki-67. IL-22R is equally expressed on tracheal epithelial cells on both apical and basal sides in WT and IL-22−/− mice (Figure 4a–c). The epithelial cell layer became disorganized and damaged with continued viral infection on DPI 4, in both WT and IL-22−/− mice. Interestingly, in the trachea of WT mice, a considerable number of epithelial cells became positive for Ki-67 on DPI 4, indicating the start of cell division in the epithelial layer. However, only a minimal number of Ki-67 cells could be detected in the IL-22−/− mice (Figure 4a–c). Flow cytometry analyses of IL-22R expression in the E-Cadherin+ tracheal epithelial cells did not reveal any significant differences between the WT and IL-22−/− mice (Figure 4b). However, compared with WT, the trachea of IL-22−/− mice contained significantly reduced percentages of Ki-67+ epithelial cells on DPI 7 (Figure 4c). On the basis of our observations, we conclude that IL-22 indeed has a critical role in the regeneration of tracheal epithelial cells.

Figure 4
figure 4

Lack of interleukin-22 (IL-22) significantly reduces the proliferation of tracheal epithelial cells. (a) Tracheal sections from infected mice on different days post infection (DPI) were stained with anti-IL-22R, anti-Ki-67, or isotype antibodies and analyzed using confocal microscopy. Data shown are one representative of a minimum of three independent experiments with three mice each DPI. (b) Flow cytometric analyses of IL-22R expression by tracheal epithelial cells or of (c) Ki-67 in influenza-infected wild-type (WT) and IL-22−/− mice on DPI 0 and 7. Data presented averages and s.d. of percent IL-22R or Ki-67-positive epithelial cells (E-Cadherin+) were calculated from three of WT and IL-22−/− mice each. DIC, differential interference contrast; E-Cad, E-Cadherin.

PowerPoint slide

Adoptive transfer of IL-22-sufficient NK cells is epithelial regenerative and inflammation protective

To determine the exclusive role of conventional NK cells in the regeneration of tracheal epithelial cells, we sorted CD3NK1.1+NCR1+. NK cells from the lung of B6.SJL (CD45.1+) mice and adoptively transferred (1 × 106 per mice) into influenza-infected IL-22−/− mice (CD45.2+) on DPI 4 (Figure 5a). One day after the adoptive transfer, CD45.1+ donor NK cells could be detected in the PR8-infected host BAL fluid and spleen (Figure 5b). Most importantly, a subset of the CD45.1+ donor NK cells in the host BAL fluid and spleen were IL-22-positive (Figure 5b and c). Confocal microscopic analyses of infected host lung sections revealed the presence of IL-22-producing CD45.1+NCR1+ donor cells (Figure 5d and e). In addition, evaluations in multiple confocal microscopic fields further confirmed that only the donor (CD45.1+) but not the recipient (CD45.2+) NK cells produced IL-22 1 day (Figure 5f) or 3 days (Figure 5g) after adoptive transfer.

Figure 5
figure 5

Adoptive transfer and detection of interleukin-22 (IL-22)-producing natural killer (NK) cells in IL-22−/− mice. (a) Sorting schema for CD3NK1.1+NCR1+ NK cells. CD45.1+ lung-derived lymphocytes from B6.SJL mice (H-2b) were stained with anti-CD3, anti-NK1.1, and anti-NCR1 antibodies and the CD3NK1.1+NCR1+ NK cells were sorted and cultured with IL-2 for 8-12 days before they were adoptively transferred intravenously into IL-22−/− mice (H-2b, CD45.2+) on DPI 4 of influenza infection. (b) Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and (c) spleens of the host IL-22−/− mice were tested for donor-derived IL-22-generating NK cells. Lungs from the host mice were analyzed through confocal microcopy for the presence of CD45.1+ IL-22-producing NK cells after (d) 1 or (e) 3 days of adoptive transfer. (f, g) Quantification of IL-22-producing NK cells in (d) and (e). IL-22+CD45.1+ or IL-22+CD45.2+ NK cells were counted in 10 independent fields per combination and are shown as averages with s.d. DIC, differential interference contrast; DPI, days post infection; FSC, forward scatter; SSC, side scatter.

PowerPoint slide

Next, we investigated whether adoptive transfer of donor NK cells can rescue the IL-22−/− mice from severe weight loss and epithelial cell damage. PR8 infection led to severe loss of body weight in both WT and IL-22−/− mice (Figure 6a). On DPI 4, these mice lost >10% of their total body weight. By DPI 10, WT mice started to recover, whereas the IL-22−/− mice failed to display any improvement and continued to lose body weight (Figure 6a). Transfer of IL-22-sufficient NK cells into IL-22−/− mice prevented severe weight loss (Figure 6b). Most of these mice displayed only minimal weight loss and fully recovered their weight after adoptive transfer. However, this recovery can also be attributed to increased levels of effector functions such as cytotoxicity and anti-viral cytokine production by the donor NK cells. Therefore, to determine the precise role of IL-22 in the recovery of the infected mice, we adoptively transferred IL-22-deficient NK cells into IL-22−/− mice. It is important to note that the IL-22-deficient NK cells developed and matured normally (data not shown). Moreover, they displayed comparable levels of cytotoxicity against H60+ target cells and production of interferon-γ, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, tumor necrosis factor-α, macrophage inflammatory protein-1α, macrophage inflammatory protein-1β and RANTES to their WT counter parts (Kumar and Malarkannan, unpublished). Transfer of these IL-22-deficient NK cells into IL-22−/− mice following influenza infection resulted in only moderate weight loss compared with that of IL-22−/− mice receiving IL-22-sufficient NK cells (Figure 6b). This implies that an IL-22-independent effect of donor NK cells control the severity of the weight loss during infection. Microscopic analyses of tracheal sections on DPI 7 and DPI 15 revealed that the adoptive transfer of one million IL-22-sufficient lung-derived NK cells significantly reduced the epithelial layer damage (Figure 6c and d). Transfer of IL-22-sufficient NK cells fully restored the regenerative abilities of the epithelial monolayer. By DPI 15, the epithelial layers were fully restored with only a minimal residual damage (Figure 6d). In contrast, IL-22−/− mice that were infused with IL-22-deficient NK cells failed to regenerate their tracheal epithelial cell layers. Tracheal sections derived from both DPI 7 and DPI 15 displayed persistent epithelial damage (30%) as seen in the IL-22−/− mice (Figure 6d).

Figure 6
figure 6

Adoptively transferred interleukin-22 (IL-22)-sufficient but not IL-22-deficient natural killer (NK) cells promote epithelial cell regeneration in IL-22−/− mice. (a, b) Weight loss after influenza infection was monitored in wild-type (WT) and in IL-22−/− mice with or without the adoptive transfer of NK cells. Weight loss in individual mice is represented by lines and the average values are shown in red circles. Data presented were from a total of 17 WT and 16 IL-22−/− with no adoptive transfer and 5–9 mice with adoptive transfer. Arrows indicate the time of adoptive transfer of NK cells into IL-22−/− mice. (c, d) Integrity of tracheal epithelial cell layers after adoptive transfer of IL-22-sufficient or -deficient NK cells into IL-22−/− mice. (c) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of trachea from WT and IL-22−/− mice on indicated days post infection (DPI) that were adoptively transferred with IL-22-sufficient or IL-22-deficient NK cells. Exploded views are shown for details. (d) Epithelial cell damage per cartilage length was calculated from 3 to 6 mice for each DPI and presented with P-values and NS denotes not significant. “n” denotes the number of cartilages analyzed for each group.

PowerPoint slide

Using confocal microscopy, we analyzed tracheal epithelial cell proliferation by staining for Ki-67 (red) along with IL-22R (green) (Figure 7a). Infusion of IL-22-sufficient NK cells into the infected IL-22−/− mice resulted in an increase in the Ki-67-positive epithelial cells. However, trachea from IL-22−/− mice that were infused or not with IL-22-deficient NK cells showed a considerable decrease in Ki-67 positivity (Figure 7a). We also analyzed the status of bronchial epithelial cells in these mice. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the lung tissue revealed that the adoptive transfer of IL-22-sufficient NK cells improved the regeneration of the bronchial epithelial cell layer in IL-22−/− mice as evidenced from DPI 7 and DPI 15 tissue sections (Figure 7b). Conversely, both IL-22−/− mice and IL-22-deficient NK cell-infused IL-22−/− mice failed to regenerate their epithelial layer (Figure 7b, exploded views). To further determine the degree of pathology in the lungs, we quantified the levels of collagen fiber deposition as a measure of inflammation. Masson's trichrome staining showed a considerable increase in collagen deposition in the lung tissues of IL-22−/− mice compared with that of WT (Figure 8a). Infusion of IL-22-sufficient NK cells significantly reduced the levels of collagen deposition and the associated pathology score (Figure 8b). However, infusion of IL-22-deficient NK cells did not reduce the severity of inflammation in the lung tissue and was similar to that of IL-22−/− mice (Figure 8a and b). On the basis of these data, we conclude that conventional NK cells in the lung have both a protective and a pro-regenerative role.

Figure 7
figure 7

Adoptive transfer of interleukin-22 (IL-22)-sufficient natural killer (NK) cells augments epithelial cell proliferation in IL-22−/− mice. (a) Tracheal sections from IL-22−/− mice with or without the adoptive transfer of NK cells were immunostained with anti-IL-22R and anti-Ki-67. Data shown are representatives of confocal images from indicated mice. Tracheae were collected after indicated DPI. White scale bars in each confocal image represent five microns. (b) Lungs from the IL-22−/− mice with or without adoptive transfer of IL-22-sufficient or IL-22-deficient NK cells were sectioned and stained with Hematoxylin and eosin to analyze the regeneration of bronchial epithelial cells on indicated days post infection (DPI). Photomicrographs of selected areas of apical lobes of the lungs show the levels of epithelial cell regeneration in the lumen side of the bronchia. Boxes denote the area selected and magnified. The black bar in the top left panel represents a scale of 100 micron. Data presented were from a total of at least three mice for each DPI from one of three independent experiments.

PowerPoint slide

Figure 8
figure 8

Lack of interleukin-22 (IL-22) increases lung inflammation. (a) Severity of inflammation after adoptive transfer of IL-22-sufficient or IL-22-deficient natural killer (NK) cells as visualized by collagen deposition (Mason's trichrome staining, blue) in the lung tissue. (b) Quantification of the degree of inflammation in the lung tissues on indicated days post infection (DPI). Levels of collagen deposition were determined by a double-blind assay with a scale of 1–10, with 10 being severe. Data shown were collected from a total of 3–6 mice per DPI and were representatives of a minimum of three independent experiments. Asterisks in (b) denote: **P<0.001. DIC, differential interference contrast; DPI, days post infection; NS, not significant.

PowerPoint slide

Discussion

Tracheal epithelial cells are the major targets of many respiratory viruses.6, 38 A successful entry of these viruses into the epithelial cells leads to viral multiplication and eventual destruction of this layer.39 Therefore, a rapid regeneration of this protective barrier is extremely critical to prevent secondary opportunistic bacterial infections.7 Indeed, loss of ciliary activity and destruction of the epithelial cell layer leads to increased risk of bacterial infections that cause severe pneumonia, which could be fatal.7 In this context, the role of IL-22 in tracheal epithelial cell homeostasis during viral infection has not been investigated. Here, we demonstrate that tracheal epithelial cells constitutively express abundant levels of IL-22R. PR8-mediated infection extensively damages the epithelial monolayer. More importantly, our findings are first to demonstrate that IL-22 derived from conventional NK cells is crucial for the regeneration of tracheal and bronchial epithelial cells.

In this study, we establish that the IL-22-producing, NCR1+ cells in the trachea and lungs of the infected mice possess a conventional NK cell phenotype and differ from the LTi-like or NK-like subset defined in the gut. Existing paradigms define IL-22-generating NCR1+ cells as a novel LTi-like subset that exhibit NCR1+NK1.1CD127+RORγt+ phenotype.19, 21, 23, 26 These gut-resident cells are characterized by three essential features. First, the NK-like cells predominantly found in the intestinal lamina propria depend on IL-7 for their development but not IL-15.25 Unique expression of IL-7 receptor chain α (CD127) in these cells helps to identify them among other innate cells.25 In contrast to this, our study shows that the IL-22-producing cells in the influenza-infected lungs lacked CD127 expression. The expression of pan NK cell marker NK1.1 (CD161)40 was reported to be notably low or negative in a significant proportion of IL-22+ NK-like subset in the gut.21, 23 However, in our study, we did not find a similar phenotypic population in the lungs of influenza-infected mice. In contrast to the observations made in the gut, the lung-derived IL-22+ cells were predominantly positive for NK1.1. Similar to LTi cells, expression of transcription factor RORγt is obligatory for the development and functions of NK-like cells in the gut.24, 41 However, we failed to detect any expression of RORγt in the lung-derived, IL-22-producing, NCR1+NK1.1+ cells; thereby, indicating their dependence on a developmental pathway similar to that of conventional NK cells. On the basis of these observations, we conclude that the lung-derived IL-22-generating cells are NK1.1+ and RORγt and, therefore, are conventional NK cells.

Earlier studies have shown that the development and functions of conventional NK cells depend on IL-15 and both IL-15−/− and the IL-15Rα−/− mice lack these cells.42 Unlike conventional NK cells, the development of gut-derived NK-like cells do not depend on IL-15 as evidenced by their normal numbers in IL-15−/− mice.25 Conversely, our studies using IL-15Rα−/− mice found that IL-22-producing, NCR1+ lung cells were absent in these mice, further confirming that these cells are conventional NK cells. On the contrary, a recent study described reduced mortality in IL-15−/− mice after challenge with A/FM/1/47 (H1N1) virus that was attributed to a significant reduction in the antigen-specific CD8+ T cells with no alterations in viral titers or inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α and IL-6).43 However, this study did not investigate the status of epithelial cell damage, subsequent regeneration, and the role of IL-22. It is also important to note that the lack of IL-15Rα has been implicated in enhanced production of IL-10.44 Thus, an overall reduction in the mortality could be attributed to a reduced recruitment of T cells that results in significantly less inflammation and pathogenesis. This is further confirmed by the fact that the overexpression of IL-15 is associated with autoimmune intestinal damage and celiac disease.45 Earlier studies have also shown that the gut-derived NK-like cells are NKG2D+, NKG2A+, c-Kit+, and CD69+.26 Most importantly, unlike conventional NK cells, these NK-like cells were CD11b, Ly49Low CD122Low.26 Although we found that the lung-derived IL-22-producing, conventional NK cells expressed comparable levels of NKG2D, NKG2A, and CD69, there was a significant increase in the expression of c-Kit. The expression of CD11b, CD122, and various Ly49 receptors were largely unaltered (data not shown).

Regeneration of epithelial cells is crucial to maintain lung homeostasis. In adult human trachea, cell turnover is considerably low.46 However, epithelial injury initiates rapid proliferation of surviving cells.47 Infection of C57BL/6 mice with influenza resulted in epithelial cell damage and eventual regeneration through vigorous proliferation starting from DPI 7, as indicated by their expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen.39 However, factors that induce the proliferation of lung epithelial cells were not defined. Although earlier studies described the possible production of IL-22 from NK cells, they did not correlate the IL-22 function to epithelial cell regeneration.30, 48, 49 Our results show that the lack of IL-22 significantly impaired the regenerative potentials of tracheal epithelial cells as indicated by Ki-67 staining. This nuclear protein is a cell proliferation marker that can be exclusively detected inside the nucleus during interphase. Ki-67 is present during G1, S, G2, and mitotic phases, but is absent from resting cells (G0).50 Thus, IL-22 is critical for the regeneration of epithelial cells after injury caused by viral infections and corroborate with earlier studies, where activation via IL-22R results in epithelial cell survival, proliferation, and IL-10 release.51 In addition, epithelial cells also produce anti-microbial proteins such as β-defensins and S100As in response to IL-22.23 Expression of IL-22R was not altered in the IL-22−/− mice, excluding a potential auto-regulatory role for IL-22 in its receptor expression. We found additional cells that were positive for IL-22R in the infected mice between the basement membrane and the cartilaginous structures; however, their identities are currently not known. These cells could possibly be basal stem cells that are differentiating, which would eventually give rise to mature epithelial cells.

A recent study has suggested that in vivo neutralization of IL-22 using antibodies did not alter the pattern of body weight loss during influenza infection.52 However, this study failed to demonstrate that the anti-IL-22 antibody treatment fully neutralized the functions of IL-22. In our study, adoptive transfer of IL-22-sufficient NK cells from the donor on DPI 4, significantly reduced the weight loss in the IL-22−/− mice. Interestingly, adoptive transfer of IL-22-deficient NK cells also conferred protection against weight loss, indicating an IL-22-independent effect of donor NK cells. Further studies are required to precisely determine the molecular basis of this protective phenomenon of NK cells. Adoptive transfer of IL-22-sufficient but not IL-22-deficient NK cells restored the regenerative potentials of epithelial cells in IL-22−/− mice. This could be due to the fact that IL-22 induces anti-microbial peptides,17, 53 which in turn helped to reduce the severity of influenza virus infections. Moreover, IL-22 can also stimulate the production of anti-inflammatory IL-10 from epithelial cells.51 In turn, IL-10 can reduce the entry of inflammatory lymphocytes into the lung through a negative feedback. Our present study sets the stage for clinical immunotherapies, such as administration of IL-22 or IL-22-producing NK cells for patients requiring rapid regeneration of epithelial cell layers. This includes pulmonary complications, burn victims, or patients who develop severe graft-versus-host disease after donor-derived bone marrow transplantations. In these patients, a local or a systemic administration of IL-22 may accelerate epithelial cell regeneration and the production of anti-microbial peptides to efficiently prevent secondary opportunistic infections.

Methods

Mice, virus, and cell-lines. The C57BL/6 (WT), IL-15Rα−/−, and B6. SJL (CD45.1) mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Generation of IL-22 gene knockout mice has been described earlier.17 All mice were maintained in pathogen-free conditions at the Biological Resource Center of the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW), Milwaukee, WI. All animal protocols used were approved by the MCW IACUC. MDCK cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD) and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum. Mouse adapted human influenza virus A/PR/8/34 (PR8) was (a kind gift from Dr Thomas M Moran, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, NY) used as described.54

In vivo infection and BAL fluid collection. WT mice 6–8 weeks of age were deeply anesthetized and were intranasally challenged with 5,000 plaque-forming unit of PR8 virus in sterile phosphate-buffered saline in a total volume of 30 μl through one nostril. Mock infections were carried out using only sterile phosphate-buffered saline without the virus. After infections, mice were euthanized and thoracic cavity was cut open and a 1 cm incision was made parallel to the trachea through the fur of the mouse to expose it. A midline incision was made on the ventral aspect of the trachea slightly above the thoracic inlet 0.3 ml of phosphate-buffered saline-1% bovine serum albumin was infused into lung through the thoracic inlet using a sterile 1 ml syringe. Lavage fluid was aspirated, aliquoted, and frozen until use.

Lung pathology. To determine the levels of epithelial damage, cryosections from PR8-infected mice were stained with hematoxylin and Eosin. Levels of lung pathology were determined by collagen deposition using Masson's trichrome staining. Severity of lung pathology was quantified in a double-blind method based on the intensity of staining in a scale of 1 to 10, where 10 being the highest. To statistically quantify the epithelial damage each cartilage length was taken as a single unit (100%) from which the percent damage was measured (Supplementary Figure S6 online). Images of trachea were obtained at × 10 magnification using light microscopy, images were printed and total lengths of individual cartilages were measured and compared with lengths of respective tracheal regions where epithelial cells were missing or damaged. Percent damage was calculated as (length of the tracheal region with epithelial damage/respective individual cartilage length) × 100. Multiple individual cartilages were analyzed for each DPI. Images of lung tissues were obtained at × 10 magnification using the same microscope and the pathology was evaluated.

Detection of viral nucleoprotein by LI-COR odyssey. Infrared dye-based methodology was standardized in our laboratory to quantify the influenza viral titers in unknown samples.29 Briefly, MDCK cells were cultured in optical flat bottom black 384-well plates, washed twice with serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin, 100 U ml–1 penicillin, 100 μg ml–1 streptomycin, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 5% sodium bicarbonate solution and 0.001% ß-mercaptoehanol. MDCK cells were incubated with 10 μl of BAL fluid that was collected on different DPI or control PR8 virus with known plaque-forming unit in 10 μl (384-well plate) medium-containing L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone-treated trypsin (0.2 μg ml–1). Following 1 h of infection, an additional 40 μl of 10% fetal bovine serum-containing medium was added to each well. After 16 h of infection, cells were washed twice for 5 min with phosphate-buffered saline-containing 1% bovine serum albumin and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde. After blocking, infected cells were stained with anti-nucleoprotein antibody (1:1,000, clone V232208, CDC). Cells were washed and incubated for 1 h with goat anti-mouse IRDye@800 secondary antibody (1:200, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE). Plates were scanned using 780 nM for detection and 680 nM channels as reference in LI-COR Odyssey IR scanner (LI-COR).

Lymphocyte and epithelial cell preparations. Single-cell suspensions from various tissues were prepared and used for different analyses. Briefly, lungs were minced into pieces and digested with 500 μl of 10 mg ml–1 collagenase (C5138, 100 mg, Sigma, St Louis, MO) and 50 μl of 200 IU of DNase I from bovine pancreas (D4527-20KU, Sigma) in total volume of 5 ml of RPMI1640 complete medium for 1 h at 37 °C. Lymphocytes from the lung were isolated by Ficoll–Hypaque density gradient. To separate lymphocytes from the gut, tissue pieces (1–1.5 cm) were incubated with trypsin-EDTA to separate intra-epithelial lymphocytes.55 Tissue fragments were digested with 500 μl of 10 mg ml–1 collagenase and 50 μl of 200 IU of DNase I. Lamina propria lymphocytes were further purified using discontinuous Percoll gradient (40 and 80%; Sigma). For epithelial cell isolation, trachea was digested in dispase (5 mg ml–1, Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC) for 15 min followed by 10-min incubation in trypsin-EDTA at 37 °C.

Flow cytometry. Flow cytometry was performed as described earlier.56, 57 Single-cell preparations from spleen, trachea, lung, and lamina propria lymphocyte were surface stained with CD3ɛ (145-2C11), NK1.1 (PK136), NCR1 (29A1.4), CD127 (A7R34), γδTCR (GL3) (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), and IL-23R (258010) and E-Cadherin (R&D System, Minneapolis, MN). For intracellular staining, single-cell suspensions from lung or BAL or spleen or trachea were first stain for surface receptor for 30 min followed by fixation (Fixation buffer, BioLegend, San Diego, CA), and permeabilization (permeabilization wash buffer, BioLegend) steps for additional 20 min. Cells were stained intracellularly with phycoerythrin-conjugated IL-22 (140301) (R&D System) or RORγt (AFKJS-9, B2D) (eBioscience) or Ki-67 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) in permeabilization wash buffer and analyzed in LSR-II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).

Confocal microscopy. Confocal microscopy was performed as described earlier.58 To detect IL-22+ donor NK cells following adoptive transfer, lung cryosections were stained with anti-mouse -CD45.1-Alexa. Flour 488 (donor), -CD45.2-Pacific Blue (host), -NCR1-APC, and -IL-22-PE. Respective isotype controls were used to confirm the specificity of stainings. Lung cryosections from PR8-infected mice were also stained for rabbit anti-E-Cadherin (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) and anti-Annexin-V (BD Biosciences) or rat anti-IL-22R (R&D System) and rabbit anti-Ki-67 (Abcam) overnight. After three washes, cryosections were stained with respective Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h. Images were obtained using Olympus FluoView FV1000 MPE microscope (Olympus, Center Valley, PA).

Adoptive transfer. Single-cell suspensions from the lungs of B6.SJL (H-2b CD45.1+) or IL-22−/− mice were produced and the lymphocytes were isolated on a Ficoll density gradient. These lymphocyte preparations were stained with anti-CD3, anti-NCR1, and anti-NK1.1 monoclonal antibodies. CD3NCR1+NK1.1+ conventional NK cells were sorted and cultured in 1000 U of IL-2 for 8–12 days. In all, 1 × 106 cells were adoptively transferred into IL-22−/− (CD45.2) on DPI 4, intravenously. Donor CD45.1+ NK cells were detected and the generation of IL-22 was analyzed following day 1 and day 3 post adoptive transfer by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy.

Statistics. Statistical analyses were performed using the two-tailed, unpaired, Student's t-test. P-values that were ≤0.05 were considered significant.