Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Consent and privacy in pharmacogenetic testing

The clinical use of pharmacogenetic drugs will require that a sample of a patient's DNA be tested before a drug is prescribed. Although pharmacogenetic tests pose fewer risks than genetic tests for disease mutations, they might still reveal personal information that could be used adversely to a patient's interests. Informed consent and privacy of pharmacogenetic test results may be essential in most clinical uses of pharmacogenetic drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Andrews, L.B., Fullerton, J.E., Holtzman, N.A. & Motulsky, A.G. Assessing Genetic Risks: Implications for Health and Social Policy (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1994).

  2. Holtzman, N.A. & Watson, M.S. Promoting Safe and Effective Genetic Testing in the United States: Final Report of the Task Force on Genetic Testing 180 (NIH-DOE Working Group on Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Human Genome Research, Task Force on Genetic Testing, Washington, DC, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Secretary's Advisory Commission on Genetic Testing. Final Report, Enhancing the Oversight of Genetic Tests http://www4.od.nih.gov/oba/sacgt/reports/sacgtfinal.pdf (2000).

  4. Roses, A.D. Pharmacogenetics and the practice of medicine. Nature 405, 857–865 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Editorial. Nature Genet. 28, 195–196 (2001).

  6. Torres A. The use of Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for unlabeled (off-label) uses. The legal and ethical implications. Arch. Dermatol. 130, 32–36 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jaffee v. Redmond, 116 S.Ct. 1923 (1996).

  8. Institute for Health Care Research and Policy, Georgetown University. Health Policy Project, The State of Health Privacy: an Uneven Terrain http://www.healthprivacy.org/usr_doc/35309%2Epdf (July 1999).

  9. Department of Health and Human Services. Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information. Federal Register 65, 82462 (28 December 2000).

  10. Pear R. Bush accepts rule to protect privacy of medical records. New York Times, A1 (13 April 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marshall E. Company plans to bank human DNA profiles. Science 291, 57 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges discussions with B. Wilfond and C. Freund, and with his colleagues in the Pharmacogenetics Consortium (A. Buchanan, B. Brody, A. Califano, E. McPherson and J. Kahn), a project of The University of Arizona funded by GlaxoSmithKline, First Genetic Trust and IBM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A. Robertson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robertson, J. Consent and privacy in pharmacogenetic testing. Nat Genet 28, 207–209 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/90032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/90032

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing