Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News
  • Published:

Conflicting studies fuel arsenic debate

Nature (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Uncertainties over contaminated groundwater in southern Asia highlight gaps in science.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Datta, S. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049301 (2011).

  2. Neumann, R. B. et al. Nature Geosci. 3, 46-52 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McArthur, J. M., Ravenscroft, P. & Sracek, O. Nature Geosci. 4, 655-656 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Eugenie Samuel Reich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Related links

Related links

Related external links

London Arsenic Group

Harvey Lab

Arsenic and cancer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samuel Reich, E. Conflicting studies fuel arsenic debate. Nature (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/478437a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/478437a

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing