Several journals are already making anonymized reviewers' reports public for published papers, as Daniel Mietchen proposes (Nature 473, 452; 2011). These include Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (see http://go.nature.com/qamrfc) and The EMBO Journal (see Nature 468, 29–31; 2010). But at the European Molecular Biology Organization, we do not see an equitable way to publish referee reports on rejected manuscripts.
Instead, we favour the transfer between journals of rejected manuscripts, along with full referee reports that could be made public after acceptance of the paper. An extension of this might be to release referee names after several years, or to sign the reports with anonymized digital identifiers that could be read by official bodies to help evaluate academic performance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
B. P. is head of scientific publications at the European Molecular Biology Organization and chief editor of The EMBO Journal (published by Nature Publishing Group).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pulverer, B. Peer reviews: some are already public. Nature 474, 285 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/474285c
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/474285c