Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Ultraviolet colour variation influences blue tit sex ratios

Abstract

Brilliant blue and violet structural colours are common plumage ornaments in birds, but their signalling functions are poorly understood1. This may be because birds also communicate in ultraviolet (UV-A) wavelengths (320–400 nm)2,3,4,5, invisible to humans, but a strong spectral component of many structural colours6. From a wild population of blue tits—Parus caeruleus, sexually dimorphic primarily in the ultraviolet7,8—we report experimental evidence that females skew the sex ratio of their offspring in response to the ultraviolet plumage ornamentation of their mates. Masking male ultraviolet reflectance reversed a positive correlation between reflectance and brood sex ratio observed in control pairs, demonstrating a causal effect of male ultraviolet ornamentation on offspring sex ratio. Ultraviolet reflectance also predicted male survival to the following breeding season, suggesting that it serves as a viability indicator. When taken together with ecological effects (laying date, nesting area), our experiments reveal that an unexpected amount of control exists over the primary sex ratio in birds, suggesting that chromosomal sex determination may not constrain the sex ratios of multiparous vertebrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Natural variation and experimental effects on reflectance of blue tit crown plumage.
Figure 2: Relationships between spectral reflectance parameters and deviation from expected sex ratio (proportion males).
Figure 3: Associations between survival of male blue tits and UV colouration and sex ratio.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Owens,I. P. F. & Hartley,I. R. Sexual dimorphism in birds: why are there so many different forms of dimorphism? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 397–407 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett,A. T. D., Cuthill,I. C., Partridge,J. C. & Maier,E. J. Ultraviolet vision and mate choice in zebra finches. Nature 380, 433–435 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett,A. T. D., Cuthill,I. C., Partridge,J. C. & Lunau,K. Ultraviolet plumage colors predict mate preferences in startlings. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8618–8621 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Andersson,S. & Amundsen,T. Ultraviolet colour vision and ornamentation in bluethroats. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 1587–1591 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnsen,A., Andersson,T., Örnborg,J. & Lifjeld,J. T. Ultraviolet plumage ornamentation affects social mate choice and sperm competition in bluethroats (Aves: Luscinia s. svecica): a field experiment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1313–1318 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Finger,E. & Burkhardt,D. Biological aspects of bird coloration and avian colour vision including the ultraviolet range. Vision Res. 34, 1509–1514 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Andersson,S., Örnborg,J. & Andersson,M. Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 445–450 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunt,S., Bennett,A. T. D., Cuthill,I. C. & Griffiths,R. Blue tits are ultraviolet tits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 451–455 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Charnov,E. L. The Theory of Sex Allocation (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frank,S. A. Sex allocation theory for birds and mammals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21, 13–55 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burley,N. Sex-ratio manipulation in color-banded population of zebra finches. Evolution 40, 1191–1206 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellegren,H., Gustafsson,L. & Sheldon,B. C. Sex allocation in response to paternal attractiveness in a wild bird population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 11723–11728 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Svensson,E. & Nilsson,J.-Å. Mate quality affects offspring sex ratio in blue tits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 357–361 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kempenaers,B., Verheyen,G. R. & Dhondt,A. A. Extrapair paternity in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): female choice, male characteristics, and offspring quality. Behav. Ecol. 8, 481–492 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kempenaers,B. Polygyny in the blue tit: intra- and inter-sexual conflicts. Anim. Behav. 49, 1047–1064 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Endler,J. A. On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41, 315–352 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Møller,A. P. & Ninni,P. Sperm competition and sexual selection: a meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 43, 345–358 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krokene,C., Rigstad,K., Dale,M. & Lifjeld,J. T. The function of extrapair paternity in blue tits and great tits: good genes or fertility insurance? Behav. Ecol. 9, 649–656 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Andersson,M. Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Burley,N. & Coopersmith,C. B. Bill color preferences of zebra finches. Ethology 76, 133–151 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hill,G. E. Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350, 337–339 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cuthill,I. C., Bennett,A. T. D., Partridge,J. C. & Maier,E. J. Plumage reflectance and the objective assessment of avian sexual dichromatism. Am. Nat. 160, 183–200 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Andersson,S. Morphology of UV reflectance in a whistling-thrush: implications for the study of structural colour signalling in birds. J. Avian Biol. 30, 193–204 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Keyser,A. J. & Hill,G. E. Condition-dependent variation in the blue-ultraviolet coloration of a structurally based plumage ornament. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 771–777 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Krackow,S. Potential mechanisms for sex ratio adjustment in mammals and birds. Biol. Rev. 70, 225–241 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Komdeur,J., Daan,S., Tinbergen,J. & Mateman,A. C. Extreme adaptive modification of the sex ratio of the Seychelles warbler's eggs. Nature 385, 522–525 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kilner,R. Primary and secondary sex ratio manipulation by zebra finches. Anim. Behav. 56, 155–164 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nager,R. G., Monaghan,P., Griffiths,R., Houston,D. C. & Dawson,R. Experimental demonstration that offspring sex ratio varies with maternal condition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 570–573 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Emlen,S. T. When mothers prefer daughters over sons. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 291–292 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Griffiths,R., Double,M. C., Orr,K. & Dawson,R. J. G. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol. Ecol. 7, 1071–1075 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Dubiec, K. Oddie, U. Unger and M. Liungman for assistance, and M. Andersson, A. Bennett, N. Burley, I. Cuthill, K. Lessells, J. Merilä, S. Verhulst and M. Zuk for comments. This work was supported by the Swedish Natural Sciences Research Council (B.C.S. and S.A.), and a scholarship from the Swedish Institute (J.S.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben C. Sheldon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheldon, B., Andersson, S., Griffith, S. et al. Ultraviolet colour variation influences blue tit sex ratios. Nature 402, 874–877 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/47239

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/47239

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing