Proactive management of trade in endangered wildlife makes more sense than last-minute bans that can themselves increase trading activity, argue Philippe Rivalan and his co-authors.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
United States amphibian imports pose a disease risk to salamanders despite Lacey Act regulations
Communications Earth & Environment Open Access 04 October 2023
-
Evidence of anticipatory forest use behaviours under policy introduction: a systematic map protocol
Environmental Evidence Open Access 26 September 2023
-
The welfare of wildlife: an interdisciplinary analysis of harm in the legal and illegal wildlife trades and possible ways forward
Crime, Law and Social Change Open Access 18 August 2021
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Baillie, J. E. M., Hilton-Taylor, C. & Stuart, S. N. 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN, Gland, 2004).
Oldfield, S. F., Lusty, C. & Mackinven, A. The World List of Threatened Trees (World Conservation Press, Cambridge, 1998).
FAO Fisheries Department State of the World's Fisheries and Aquaculture 2004 (FAO, Rome, 2004).
Van Rijsoort, J. Non Timber Forest Products (National Reference Centre for Nature Management, Wageningen, 2000).
Hutton, J. M. & Dickson, B. Endangered Species, Threatened Convention: the Past, Present and Future of CITES (Earthscan, London, 2000).
Hutton, J. & Leader-Williams, N. Oryx 37, 215–226 (2003).
Nowell, K. & Jackson, P. (eds) Wild Cats: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan (IUCN, Gland, 1996).
Perälä, J. in 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN, 2003).
FAO Forest Resources Assessment (FAO, Rome, 2001).
FAO Fisheries Report No. 833; COP14 Doc. 68 Annex 3 (FAO, Rome, 2007).
IUCN Trade Measures in Multilateral Environmental Agreements (Submitted to The Economics, Trade and Environment Unit, UNEP, 2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Supplementary information
Supplementary information
(DOC 20 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rivalan, P., Delmas, V., Angulo, E. et al. Can bans stimulate wildlife trade?. Nature 447, 529–530 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/447529a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/447529a
This article is cited by
-
Evidence of anticipatory forest use behaviours under policy introduction: a systematic map protocol
Environmental Evidence (2023)
-
United States amphibian imports pose a disease risk to salamanders despite Lacey Act regulations
Communications Earth & Environment (2023)
-
The welfare of wildlife: an interdisciplinary analysis of harm in the legal and illegal wildlife trades and possible ways forward
Crime, Law and Social Change (2022)
-
Psychosocial drivers of land management behaviour: How threats, norms, and context influence deforestation intentions
Ambio (2021)
-
State of seahorse fisheries in India, nearly two decades after they were banned
Biodiversity and Conservation (2021)
