Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
SEARCH JOURNAL     advanced search
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 378, 281 - 284 (16 November 1995); doi:10.1038/378281a0

Specificity of monosynaptic connections from thalamus to visual cortex

R. Clay Reid & Jose-Manuel Alonso

Laboratory of Neurobiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021, USA

IN cortical area 17 of the cat, simple receptive fields are arranged in elongated subregions that respond best to bright (on) or dark (off) oriented contours, whereas the receptive fields of their thal-amic inputs have a concentric on and off organization1. This dramatic transformation suggests that there are specific rules governing the connections made between thalamic and cortical neurons1–3 (see ref. 4). Here we report a study of these rules in which we recorded from thalamic (lateral geniculate nucleus; LGN) and cortical neurons simultaneously and related their receptive fields to their connectivity, as measured by cross-correlation analysis5,6. The probability of finding a monosynaptic connection was high when a geniculate receptive field was superimposed anywhere over an elongated simple-cell subregion of the same signature (on or off). However, 'inappropriate' connections from geniculate cells of the opposite receptive field signature were extremely rare. Together, these findings imply that the outline of the elongated, simple receptive field, and thus of cortical orientation selectivity, is laid down at the level of the first synapse from the thalamic afferents.

------------------

References
1. Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. J. Physiol., Lond. 160, 106−154 (1962). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
2. Chapman, B., Zahs, K. R. & Stryker, M. P. J. Neurosci. 11, 1347−1358 (1991). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
3. Ferster, D. J. Neurosci. 7, 1780−1791 (1987). | PubMed | ChemPort |
4. Sillito, A. M. J. Physiol., Lond. 250, 305−329 (1975). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
5. Alonso, J. M., Reid, R. C. & Wiesel, T. N. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 19, 425 (1993).
6. Reid, R. C., Alonso, J. M. & Wiesel, T. N. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 20, 425 (1994).
7. Reid, R. C. & Shapley, R. M. Nature 356, 716−718 (1992). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
8. Jones, J. P. & Palmer, L. A. J. Neurophysiol. 58, 1187−1211 (1987). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
9. Rodieck, R. W. Vision Res. 5, 583−601 (1965). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
10. Jones, J. P. & Palmer, L. A. J. Neurophysiol. 58, 1233−1258 (1987). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
11. Tanaka, K. J. Neurophysiol. 49, 1303−1318 (1983). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
12. Tanaka, K. Vision Res. 25, 357−364 (1985). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
13. Perkel, D. H., Gerstein, G. L. & Moore, G. P. Biophys. J. 7, 419−440 (1967). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
14. Sutter, E. Adv. Meth. Physiol. Systems Model. 1, 303−315 (Univ. Southern California, 1987).
15. Usrey, W. M., Alonso, J. M. & Reid, R. C. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 21, 21 (1995).



© 1995 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy