Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
SEARCH JOURNAL     advanced search
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 371, 227 - 229 (15 September 2002); doi:10.1038/371227a0

A carbon–oxygen star as progenitor of the type Ic supernova 1994I

K. Nomoto*, H. Yamaoka, O. R. Pols, E. P. J. van den Heuvel§, K. Iwamoto*, S. Kumagaiparallel & T. Shigeyama*

* Department of Astronomy, School of Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113, Japan
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 810, Japan
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OHA, UK
§ Astronomy Institute and Centre for High Energy Astrophysics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
parallel Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, Wako, Saitama 350-01, Japan

SUPERNOVAE are classified observationally as type I (which have no hydrogen emission lines in their optical spectra) or type II (which do have hydrogen lines), and are further subdivided1 into types Ia, Ib, Ic, IIP, IIL and IIb. Type II supernovae are generally thought to result from the explosion of massive stars, and type Ia supernovae from white-dwarf stars that have accreted sufficient mass from a companion to trigger explosion1,2. The origins of types Ib and Ic are much less clear. The Ic class has been particularly controversial, with two main alternatives: the explosion of a massive star that has lost its hydrogen and helium envelopes through fast stellar winds, exposing the carbon- and oxygen-rich core; or the transfer of material to a companion, leaving a small, bare carbon–oxygen (C + O) star which subsequently explodes3,4. We show here that the observed characteristics of SN1994I (in the nearby galaxy NGC5194), which has recently5,6 been classified as type Ic, are best understood on the basis of the second of the two alternatives above: that the progenitor was in a close binary system and lost its outer envelopes, leaving a C + O star (of mass approximately 2 solar masses) which exploded when its iron core collapsed.

------------------

References
1. Branch, D., Nomoto, K. & Filippenko, A. V. Comments Astrophys. 15, 221−237 (1991).
2. Wheeler, J. C. & Harkness, R. P. Rep. Prog. Phys. 53, 1467−1557 (1990). | Article | ChemPort |
3. Filippenko, A. V., Porter, A. C. & Sargent, W. L. W. Astr. J. 100, 1575−1587 (1990). | Article | ChemPort |
4. Wheeler, J. C. et al. Astrophys. J. 313, L69−L73 (1987). | Article | ChemPort |
5. Schmidt, B., Challis, P. & Kirshner, R. IAU Circ. No. 5966 (1994).
6. Clocchiatti, A., Brotherton, M., Harkness, R. P. & Wheeler, J. C. IAU Circ. No. 5972 (1994).
7. Woosley, S. E., Langer, N. & Weaver, T. A. Astrophys. J. 411, 823−839 (1993). | Article | ChemPort |
8. Shigeyama, T., Nomoto, K., Tsujimoto, T. & Hashimoto, M. Astrophys. J. 361, L23−L27 (1990). | Article | ChemPort |
9. Nomoto, K., Filippenko, A. V. & Shigeyama, T. Astr. Astrophys. 240, L1−L4 (1990). | ChemPort |
10. Lucy, L. B. Astrophys. J. 383, 308−313 (1991). | Article | ChemPort |
11. Swartz, D. A., Filippenko, A. V., Nomoto, K. & Wheeler, J. C. Astrophys. J. 411, 313−322 (1993). | Article | ChemPort |
12. Yamaoka, H., Shigeyama, T. & Nomoto, K. Astr. Astrophys. 267, 433−438 (1993).
13. Wheeler, J. C. & Swartz, D. A. in Evolution of Massive Stars: Confrontation Between Theory and Observation (eds Vanbeveren, D. et al.) 425−437 (Vrije Univ., Brussels, 1994).
14. Bhattacharya, D. & van den Heuvel, E. P. J. Phys. Rep. 203, 1−124 (1991). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |
15. Habets, G. M. H. J. Astr. Astrophys. 187, 209−230 (1986).
16. Nomoto, K. & Hashimoto, M. Phys.Rep. 163, 13−36 (1988). | ChemPort |
17. Van den Heuvel, E. P. J. in Interacting Binaries (eds Nussbaumer, H. & Orr, A.) 263−474 (Springer, Berlin, 1994).
18. Pols, O. R., Coté, J., Waters, L. B. F. M. & Heise, J. Astr. Astrophys. 241, 419−438 (1991). | ChemPort |
19. Van den Bergh, S. A. Rev. Astr. Astrophys. 29, 363−407 (1991). | Article |
20. Muller, R. A. et al. Astrophys. J. 384, L9−L13 (1992). | Article |
21. Swartz, D. A. & Wheeler, J. C. Astrophys. J. 379, L13−L16 (1991). | Article | ChemPort |
22. de Vaucouleurs, G. Astrophys. J. 227, 729−755 (1979). | Article |
23. Jeffery, D. J., Branch, D., Filippenko, A. V. & Nomoto, K. Astrophys. J. 377, L89−L92 (1991). | Article | ChemPort |
24. Shigeyama, T. et al. Astrophys. J. 420, 341−347 (1994). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |
25. Rupen, M. P. et al. IAU Circ. No. 5963 (1994).
26. Yamaoka, H., Nomoto, K., Shigeyama, T. & Thielemann, F.-K. Astrophys. J. 393, L55−L58 (1992). | Article |
27. Nomoto, K., Yamaoka, H., Shigeyama, T. & Iwamoto, K. in Supernovae and Supernova Remnants (eds McCray, R. & Wang, Z.) (IAU colloq. No. 145, Kluwer, Dordrecht, in the press).
28. Panagia, N. in High Energy Phenomena Around Collapsed Stars (ed. Pacini, F.) 33−49 (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987). | ChemPort |
29. Leibundgut, B. et al. Astrophys. J. 371, L23−L26 (1990).
30. Leibundgut, B. et al. Astr. J. 105, 301−313 (1993). | Article |



© 2002 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy