Abstract
The gallop of a race horse and the minute excursions of a cellular vesicle have one thing in common: they are based on the directional movement of proteins termed molecular motors — many trillions in the case of the horse, just a few in the case of the cell vesicle. These tiny machines take nanometre steps on a millisecond timescale to drive all biological movements. Over the past 15 years new biochemical and biophysical approaches have allowed us to take a giant step forward in understanding the molecular basis of motor mechanics.
Key Points
-
Most biological movements are accomplished by protein machines, termed molecular motors. The best-studied of these are the cytoskeletal motors, including myosin, which binds actin, and kinesin and dynein, which both bind microtubules. This review focuses primarily on kinesin.
-
The catalytic motor domain shows the highest homology between different cytoskeletal motors. It possesses a binding site for ATP and a binding site for the cytoskeletal element. There is little homology outside the catalytic domain. However, even though myosin and kinesin show no sequence similarity, their catalytic motor domains are closely related structurally.
-
Motors undergo conformational changes that are driven by ATP hydrolysis. This is translated into unidirectional movement by structural elements adjacent to the catalytic motor domain.
-
Within the kinesin superfamily, most motors move towards the plus end of microtubules. Non-claret disjunctional (Ncd), however, moves in the opposite direction, towards the minus end. Using artificial chimeric motors, the region responsible for determining the direction of movement has been mapped to the neck and neck linker regions
-
Kinesins take many steps along microtubules without falling off; this is termed ‘processivity’. This is achieved by precise coordination between the two kinesin heads, so that one head is always bound; this is tightly coupled to ATP hydrolysis. Single- headed motors can also be processive.
-
Regulation of kinesin activity is largely mediated by an intramolecular interaction between the head and tail, resulting in a compact conformation that inhibits the ATPase activity of the head. Cargo binding relieves this tail inhibition.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Spudich, J. A. How molecular motors work. Nature 372, 515 –518 (1994).
Hirokawa, N., Noda, Y. & Okada, Y. Kinesin and dynein superfamily proteins in organelle transport and cell division . Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 60– 73 (1998).
Goldstein, L. B. & Philp, A. V. The road less traveled: emerging principles of kinesin motor utilization. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15, 141–183 (1999).
Cyr, J. L., Pfister, K. K., Bloom, G. S., Slaughter, C. A. & Brady, S. T. Molecular genetics of kinesin light chains: generation of isoforms by alternative splicing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 10114–10118 (1991).
Wedaman, K. P., Knight, A. E., Kendrick-Jones, J. & Scholey, J. M. Sequences of sea urchin kinesin light chain isoforms. J. Mol. Biol. 231, 155–158 ( 1993).
Moore, J. D. & Endow, S. A. Kinesin proteins: a phylum of motors for microtubule-based motility. Bioessays 18, 207–219 (1996).
Goodson, H. V., Kang, S. J. & Endow, S. A. Molecular phylogeny of the kinesin family of microtubule motor proteins. J. Cell Sci. 107, 1875– 1884 (1994).
Goldstein, L. S. With apologies to Scheherazade: tails of 1001 kinesin motors. Annu. Rev. Genet. 27, 319–351 (1993).
Vale, R. D. Switches, latches, and amplifiers: common themes of G proteins and molecular motors. J. Cell Biol. 135, 291– 302 (1996).Succinct discussion of the surprising similarities between these protein families.
Lane, J. D. & Allan, V. Microtubule-based membrane movement . Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1376, 27– 55 (1998).Excellent overview of the diverse cellular functions of motor proteins.
Kull, F. J., Sablin, E. P., Lau, R., Fletterick, R. J. & Vale, R. D. Crystal structure of the kinesin motor domain reveals a structural similarity to myosin. Nature 380, 550–555 (1996).
Sadhu, A. & Taylor, E. W. A kinetic study of the kinesin ATPase. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 11352– 11359 (1992).
Gilbert, S. P. & Johnson, K. A. Pre-steady-state kinetics of the microtubule-kinesin ATPase. Biochemistry 33, 1951–1960 (1994).
Romberg, L., Pierce, D. W. & Vale, R. D. Role of the kinesin neck region in processive microtubule-based motility. J. Cell. Biol. 140, 1407– 1416 (1998).
Grummt, M. et al. Importance of a flexible hinge near the motor domain in kinesin-driven motility. EMBO J. 17, 5536– 5542 (1998).
Case, R. B., Rice, S., Hart, C. L., Ly, B. & Vale, R. D. Role of the kinesin neck linker and catalytic core in microtubule-based motility . Curr. Biol. 10, 157–160 (2000).
McDonald, H. B., Stewart, R. J. & Goldstein, L. S. The kinesin-like ncd protein of Drosophila is a minus end-directed microtubule motor. Cell 63, 1159–1165 (1990).
Walker, R. A., Salmon, E. D. & Endow, S. A. The Drosophila claret segregation protein is a minus-end directed motor molecule. Nature 347, 780–782 (1990).
Endow, S. A. et al. Yeast Kar3 is a minus-end microtubule motor protein that destabilizes microtubules preferentially at the minus ends. EMBO J. 13, 2708–2713 (1994).
Henningsen, U. & Schliwa, M. Reversal in the direction of movement of a molecular motor. Nature 389, 93–96 (1997).
Case, R. B., Pierce, D. W., Hom Booher, N., Hart, C. L. & Vale, R. D. The directional preference of kinesin motors is specified by an element outside of the motor catalytic domain. Cell 90, 959–966 ( 1997).
Endow, S. A. & Waligora, K. W. Determinants of kinesin motor polarity. Science 281, 1200– 1202 (1998).
Sablin, E. P. et al. Direction determination in the minus-end-directed kinesin motor ncd. Nature 395, 813– 816 (1998).Analysis of the crystallographic structure of dimeric ncd.
Sack, S. et al. X-ray structure of motor and neck domains from rat brain kinesin . Biochemistry 36, 16155– 16165 (1997).
Mandelkow, E. & Hoenger, A. Structures of kinesin and kinesin-microtubule interactions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 34–44 (1999).
Hoenger, A. et al. Image reconstructions of microtubules decorated with monomeric and dimeric kinesins: comparison with x-ray structure and implications for motility. J. Cell Biol. 141, 419– 430 (1998).
Arnal, I. & Wade, R. H. Nucleotide-dependent conformations of the kinesin dimer interacting with microtubules. Structure 6, 33–38 (1998).
Hirose, K., Cross, R. A. & Amos, L. A. Nucleotide-dependent structural changes in dimeric ncd molecules complexed to microtubules. J. Mol. Biol. 278, 389–400 (1998).
Hoenger, A. et al. A new look at the microtubule binding patterns of dimeric kinesins. J. Mol. Biol. 297, 1087– 1103 (2000).
Dominguez, R., Freyzon, Y., Trybus, K. M. & Cohen, C. Crystal structure of a vertebrate smooth muscle myosin motor domain and its complex with the essential light chain: visualization of the pre-power stroke state. Cell 94, 559–571 (1998).
Becker, E. W. Kinetic equilibrium of forces and molecular events in muscle contraction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 157– 161 (2000).
Wells, A. L. et al. Myosin VI is an actin-based motor that moves backwards. Nature 401, 505–508 ( 1999).First demonstration of a myosin that moves in the opposite direction.
Gibbons, I. R. Studies on the adenosine triphosphatase activity of 14 S and 30 S dynein from cilia of Tetrahymena. J. Biol. Chem. 241, 5590–5596 (1966).
Vallee, R. B., Wall, J. S., Paschal, B. M. & Shpetner, H. S. Microtubule-associated protein 1C from brain is a two-headed cytosolic dynein . Nature 332, 561–563 (1988).
Euteneuer, U., Koonce, M. P., Pfister, K. K. & Schliwa, M. An ATPase with properties expected for the organelle motor of the giant amoeba, Reticulomyxa. Nature 332, 176– 178 (1988).
Schliwa, M., Shimizu, T., Vale, R. D. & Euteneuer, U. Nucleotide specificities of anterograde and retrograde organelle transport in Reticulomyxa are indistinguishable. J. Cell Biol. 112, 1199 –1203 (1991).
Svoboda, K., Schmidt, C. F., Schnapp, B. J. & Block, S. M. Direct observation of kinesin stepping by optical trapping interferometry . Nature 365, 721–727 (1993).First demonstration that conventional kinesin moves in 8-nm steps.
Howard, J., Hudspeth, A. J. & Vale, R. Movement of microtubules by single kinesin molecules . Nature 342, 154–158 (1989).
Young, E. C., Mahtani, H. K. & Gelles, J. One-headed kinesin derivatives move by a nonprocessive, low-duty ratio mechanism unlike that of two-headed kinesin. Biochemistry 37, 3467–3479 ( 1998).
Hancock, W. O. & Howard, J. Processivity of the motor protein kinesin requires two heads. J. Cell Biol. 140, 1395–1405 (1998).
Berliner, E., Young, E. C., Anderson, K., Mahtani, H. K. & Gelles, J. Failure of a single-headed kinesin to track parallel to microtubule protofilaments. Nature 373, 718–721 (1995).
Hackney, D. Evidence for alternating head catalysis by kinesin during microtubule-stimulated ATP hydrolysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6865–6869 (1994). Introduces the kinetic model of head–head interaction.
Ma, Y. Z. & Taylor, E. W. Interacting head mechanism of microtubule-kinesin ATPase. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 724–730 (1997).
Gilbert, S. P., Moyer, M. L. & Johnson, K. A. Alternating site mechanism of the kinesin ATPase . Biochemistry 37, 792– 799 (1998).
Rice, S. et al. A structural change in the kinesin motor protein that drives motility. Nature 402, 778– 784 (1999).Detailed analysis using an impressive array of techniques of the movements of the neck linker domain.
Lymn, R. W. & Taylor, E. W. Mechanism of adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis by actomyosin. Biochemistry 10, 4617–4624 (1971).
Mackey, A. T. & Gilbert, S. P. Moving a microtubule may require two heads: a kinetic investigation of monomeric Ncd. Biochemistry 39, 1346–1355 ( 2000).
Pechatnikova, E. & Taylor, E. W. Kinetics processivity and the direction of motion of Ncd. Biophys. J. 77, 1003–1016 (1999).
Foster, K. A. & Gilbert, S. P. Kinetic studies of dimeric Ncd: evidence that Ncd is not processive. Biochemistry 39 , 1784–1791 (2000).
Metah, A. D. et al. Myosin-V is a processive actin-based motor. Nature 400, 590–593 ( 1999).
Tabb, J. S., Molyneaux, B. J., Cohen, D. L., Kuznetsov, S. A. & Langford, G. M. Transport of ER vesicles on actin filaments in neurons by myosin V. J. Cell Sci. 111, 3221–3234 ( 1998).
Rogers, S. L. et al. Regulation of melanosome movement in the cell cycle by reversible association with myosin V. J. Cell Biol. 146, 1265–1276 (1999).
Walker, M. L. et al. Two-headed binding of a processive myosin to F-actin. Nature 405, 804–807 ( 2000).
Finer, J. T., Simmons, R. M. & Spudich, J. A. Single myosin mechanics: piconewton forces and nanometre steps. Nature 368, 113– 119 (1994).
Aizawa, H. et al. Kinesin family in murine central nervous system. J. Cell Biol. 119, 1287–1296 (1992).
Okada, Y. & Hirokawa, N. A processive single-headed motor: kinesin superfamily protein KIF1A. Science 283, 1152–1157 (1999). Experimental evidence for the directional movement of single monomeric kinesin molecules.
Okada, Y. & Hirokawa, N. Mechanism of the single-headed processivity: diffusional anchoring between the K-loop of kinesin and the C terminus of tubulin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97 , 640–645 (2000).
Hirakawa, E., Higuchi, H. & Toyoshima, Y. Y. Processive movement of single 22S dynein molecules occurs only at low ATP concentrations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2533–2537 ( 2000).
Sakikabara, H., Kojima, H., Sakai, Y., Katayama, E. & Oiwa, K. Inner-arm dynein c of Chlamydomonas flagella is a single-headed processive motor. Nature 400, 586–590 (1999).
Thaler, C. D. & Haimo, L. T. Microtubules and microtubule motors: mechanisms of regulation. Int. Rev. Cytol. 164, 269–327 (1996).
Hurd, D. D., Stern, M. & Saxton, W. M. Mutation of the axonal transport motor kinesin enhances paralytic and suppresses Shaker in Drosophila. Genetics 142, 195–204 ( 1996).
Gindhart, J. G. Jr, Desai, C. J., Beushausen, S., Zinn, K. & Goldstein, L. S. Kinesin light chains are essential for axonal transport in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 141, 443–454 (1998).
Yu, H., Toyoshima, I., Steuer, E. R. & Sheetz, M. P. Kinesin and cytoplasmic dynein binding to brain microsomes. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20457–20464 (1992).
Stenoien, D. L. & Brady, S. T. Immunochemical analysis of kinesin light chain function. Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 675–689 (1997).
Brady, S. T. & Pfister, K. K. Kinesin interactions with membrane bounded organelles in vivo and in vitro. J. Cell Sci. 14, S103–S108 ( 1991).
Verhey, K. J. et al. Light chain-dependent regulation of kinesin's interaction with microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 143, 1053 –1066 (1998).
Matthies, H. J., Miller, R. J. & Palfrey, H. C. Calmodulin binding to and cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of kinesin light chains modulate kinesin ATPase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11176–11187 ( 1993).
Hollenbeck, P. J. Phosphorylation of neuronal kinesin heavy and light chains in vivo. J. Neurochem. 60, 2265–2275 (1993).
Khodjakov, A., Lizunova, E. M., Minin, A. A., Koonce, M. P. & Gyoeva, F. K. A specific light chain of kinesin associates with mitochondria in cultured cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 333–343 ( 1998).
Hisanaga, S. et al. The molecular structure of adrenal medulla kinesin. Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 12, 264–272 (1989).
Amos, L. A. Kinesin from pig brain studied by electron microscopy. J. Cell Sci. 87, 105–111 ( 1987).
Hackney, D., Levitt, J. & Suhan, J. Kinesin undergoes a 9 S to 6 S conformational transition . J. Biol. Chem. 267, 8696– 8701 (1992).
Stock, M. F. et al. Formation of the compact conformer of kinesin requires a COOH-terminal heavy chain domain and inhibits microtubule-stimulated ATPase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 14617–14623 (1999).
Coy, D. L., Hancock, W. O., Wagenbach, M. & Howard, J. Kinesin's tail domain is an inhibitory regulator of the motor domain. Nature Cell Biol. 1, 288–292 (1999).
Friedman, D. S. & Vale, R. D. Single-molecule analysis of kinesin motility reveals regulation by the cargo-binding tail domain. Nature Cell Biol. 1, 293– 297 (1999).
Seiler, S. et al. Cargo binding and regulatory sites in the tail of fungal conventional kinesin. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 333– 338 (2000).
Coy, D. L., Wagenbach, M. & Howard, J. Kinesin takes one 8-nm step for each ATP that it hydrolyzes . J. Biol. Chem. 274, 3667– 3671 (1999).
Hackney, D. D. & Stock, F. M. Kinesin's IAK tail domain inhibits initial microtubule-stimulated ADP release. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 257–260 (2000).
Kirchner, J., Seiler, S., Fuchs, S. & Schliwa, M. Functional anatomy of the kinesin molecule in vivo. EMBO J. 18, 4404–4413 (1999).
Block, S. M., Goldstein, L. S. & Schnapp, B. J. Bead movement by single kinesin molecules studied with optical tweezers. Nature 348, 348– 352 (1990).
Hua, W., Young, E. C., Fleming, M. L. & Gelles, J. Coupling of kinesin steps to ATP hydrolysis. Nature 388, 390–393 (1997).
Schnitzer, M. J. & Block, S. M. Kinesin hydrolyses one ATP per 8-nm step. Nature 388, 386– 390 (1997).
Gilbert, S. P., Webb, M. R., Brune, M. & Johnson, K. A. Pathway of processive ATP hydrolysis by kinesin. Nature 373, 671–676 (1995).
Wang, M. D., et al. Force and velocity measured for single molecules of RNA polymerase . Science 282, 902–907 (1998).
Uptain, S. M., Kane, C. M. & Chamberlin, M. J. Basic mechanisms of transcript elongation and its regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 117– 172 (1997).
Gelles, J. & Landick, R. RNA polymerase as a molecular motor . Cell 93, 13–16 (1998).
Jager, J. & Pata, J. D. Getting a grip: polymerases and their substrate complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9, 21–28 (1999).
Kinosita, K. Jr, Yasuda, R., Noji, H., Ishiwata, S. & Yoshida, M. F1-ATPase: a rotary motor made of a single molecule. Cell 93, 21–24 (1998).
DeRosier, D. J. The turn of the screw: the bacterial flagellar motor. Cell 93, 17–20 (1998).
Ryu, W. S., Berry, R. M. & Berg, H. C. Torque-generating units of the flagellar motor of Escherichia coli have a high duty ratio. Nature 403, 444–447 (2000).
Tilney, L. G. & Portnoy, D. A. Actin filaments and the growth, movement, and spread of the intracellular bacterial parasite, Listeria monocytogenes. J. Cell Biol. 109, 1597 –1608 (1989).
May, R. C. et al. The Arp2/3 complex is essential for the actin-based motility of Listeria monocytogenes. Curr. Biol. 9, 759–762 (1999).
Frischknecht, F. et al. Actin-based motility of vaccinia virus mimics receptor tyrosine kinase signalling. Nature 401, 926– 929 (1999).
Kull, F. J., Vale, R. D. & Fletterick, R. J. The case for a common ancestor: kinesin and myosin motor proteins and G proteins. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 19, 877–886 (1998).
Howard, J. Molecular motors: structural adaptations to cellular functions. Nature 389, 561–567 ( 1997).
Kozielski, F. et al. The crystal structure of dimeric kinesin and implications for microtubule–dependent motility. Cell 91, 985–994 (1997).First crystallographic structure of dimeric conventional kinesin that provides the basis for all considerations of kinesin mechanics.
Acknowledgements
We thank U. Euteneuer and K. Hahlen for valuable comments. Work in the authors’ laboratory is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Volkswagen Stiftung, and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Related links
Related links
DATABASE LINKS
FURTHER INFORMATION
Structure and function of microtubules
Online animation: Kinesin stepping
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LIFE SCIENCES
Glossary
- P-LOOP-TYPE ATP-BINDING SITE
-
‘Phosphate-binding loop’; a nucleotide-binding consensus motif (GXXXXGKT/S) at the ATP-binding site.
- CROSSBRIDGE CYCLE
-
The sequence of structural changes of a myosin head coordinated with the hydrolysis of one molecule of ATP.
- DUTY RATIO
-
The fraction of time that a motor molecule remains attached to the track during one full ATP hydrolysis cycle.
- GLIDING ASSAY
-
Optical assay for the movement of cytoskeletal filaments over a ‘lawn’ of motor molecules attached to a coverslip.
- OPTICAL TRAP ASSAY
-
A focused laser beam that traps refractile particles (for example, polystyrene beads) with attached motor molecules, allowing determination of step size and force per step.
- RETAINING FORCE
-
Force exerted by a laser trap on a motor-carrying bead, moving along a microtubule. molecule of ATP.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woehlke, G., Schliwa, M. Walking on two heads: the many talents of kinesin. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 1, 50–58 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35036069
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35036069
This article is cited by
-
Could some mutations of the KIF5A gene be responsible for a dominant CMT2 phenotype? (Case report)
Acta Neurologica Belgica (2023)
-
The architecture of kinesin-3 KLP-6 reveals a multilevel-lockdown mechanism for autoinhibition
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Control of protein-based pattern formation via guiding cues
Nature Reviews Physics (2022)
-
Identification of key biomarkers associated with development and prognosis in patients with ovarian carcinoma: evidence from bioinformatic analysis
Journal of Ovarian Research (2019)
-
A multistage rotational speed changing molecular rotor regulated by pH and metal cations
Nature Communications (2018)