Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The genetic basis of Haldane's rule

Abstract

‘Haldane's rule’, formulated by J. B. S. Haldane in 1922, states that: “When in the F1 offspring of two different animal races one sex is absent, rare, or sterile, that sex is the heterozygous [heterogametic] sex” (ref. 1). His rule is now known to apply in mammals, lepidopterans, birds, orthopterans and dipterans1–5. In Drosophila, for example, Bock6 cites 142 cases of interspecific hybridizations that produce one sterile and one fertile sex in the offspring, all but one of these crosses yielding sterile XY males and fertile XX females. Despite much speculation, however, the genetic basis of Haldane's rule remains unknown. Haldane himself rejected the simple explanation that males are innately more sensitive than females to the effects of hybridization because groups with heterogametic females (such as birds and butterflies) usually show female sterility in hybrids, so that heterogamety itself is the critical feature. He and others1,2,4,7 suggested that heterogametic infertility or inviability in hybrids arises by a genetic imbalance between X chromosomes and autosomes. An alternative explanation5,8,9 is that this syndrome is caused by a mismatch of X and Y chromosomes. Here I show that in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup, Haldane's rule for fertility apparently arises from a genetic interaction between X and Y chromosomes and not from an imbalance between sex chromosomes and autosomes. This finding has important implications for understanding the evolution of interspecific reproductive isolation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haldane, J. B. S. J. Genet. 12, 101–109 (1922).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. White, M. J. D. Animal Cytology and Evolution (Cambridge University Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. White, M. J. D., Contreros, M., Cheney, J. & Webb, G. C. Chromosoma 61, 127–148 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harvey, A. W. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 12, 349–355 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Curtis, C. F., Langley, P. A. & Trewern, M. A. Heredity 45, 405–410 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bock, I. R. Evol. Biol. 18 (in the press).

  7. Bacci, G. Sex Determination (Pergamon, Oxford, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haldane, J. B. S. The Causes of Evolution (Longmans, Green, New York, 1932).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fraccaro, M., Trepolo, L., Laudani, V., Marchi, A. & Jayakar, S. D. Nature 265, 327–328 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dobzhansky, T., Ayala, F. J., Stebbins, G. L. & Valentine, J. W. Evolution (Freeman, San Francisco, 1977).

  11. Dobzhansky, T. J. Genet. 34, 135–151 (1937).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. David, J., Lemeunier, F., Tsacas, L. & Bocquet, C. Ann. Genet. 17, 235–241 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsacas, L. & David, J. Bull. Soc. Ent. Fr. 79, 42–46 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tsacas, L. & Bächli, G. Revue fr. Ent. (nouv. Ser.) 3, 146–150 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lemeunier, F. & Ashburner, M. Chromosoma 89, 343–351 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Williamson, J. H. in The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 1b (eds Ashburner, M. & Novitski, E.) 667–699 (Academic, London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Livak, K. J. Genetics 107, 611–634 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Coyne, J. A. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 4444–4447 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bridges, C. B. Genetics 1, 1–52 (1916).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hardy, R. W. et al. Genetics 107, 591–610 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanchez, L. Experientia 38, 448–449 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coyne, J. The genetic basis of Haldane's rule. Nature 314, 736–738 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/314736a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/314736a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing