Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Retinal light adaptation—evidence for a feedback mechanism

Abstract

Light adaptation is the adjustment of retinal response properties to variations in ambient illumination. It enables the encoding of visual information over a millionfold intensity range, from moonlight to broad daylight, despite the relatively small dynamic range of response of visual neurones. We have studied the effects of light adaptation on the dynamics and sensitivity of visual responses of neurones in the turtle retina, by measuring the responses of horizontal cells in the retina to light which was modulated with a sinusoidal time course around various mean levels. As a quantitative measure of the transduction from light to neural signals, we calculated the gain of response at each frequency. Gain is defined as the amplitude of the modulated response component divided by the amplitude of light modulation. We report here that the gain (mV photon−1) at low temporal frequencies decreased as the mean light level increased. Over a 2 log-unit range of mean light levels, low-frequency gain was inversely proportional to the mean light level, as in Weber's law. However, at high temporal frequencies, the gain was almost independent of mean light level. Our results are reminiscent of Kelly's1 results on human temporal-frequency sensitivity in various states of light adaptation. We found that a family of horizontal-cell temporal frequency responses, measured at various mean light levels, could be accounted for by a negative feedback model in which the feedback strength is proportional to mean light level.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kelly, D. H. J. opt. Soc. Am. 51, 747–754 (1961); 61, 537–546 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shapley, R. M. & Enroth-Cugell, C. in Progress in Retinal Research (eds Osborne, N. & Chader, G.) (Pergamon, London, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baylor, D. A. & Hodgkin, A. L. J. Physiol., Lond. 242, 729–758 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Normann, R. A. & Perlman, I. J. Physiol., Lond. 286, 491–508 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Simon, E. J. J. Physiol., Lond. 230, 199–211 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fuortes, M. G. F. & Simon, E. J. J. Physiol, Lond. 240, 177–198 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yazulla, S. Vision Res. 16, 727–735 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Perlman, I. & Normann, R. A. Vision Res. 19, 903–906 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuortes, M. G. F., Schwartz, E. A. & Simon, E. J. J. Physiol., Lond. 234, 199–216 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baylor, D. A., Fuortes, M. G. F. & O'Bryan, P. M. J. Physiol., Lond. 214, 265–294 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. O'Bryan, P. M. J. Physiol., Lond. 235, 207–223 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tranchina, D., Gordon, J., Shapley, R. & Toyoda, J.-I. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 6540–6542 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Naka, K.-I., Sakuranaga, M. & Chappell, R. L. Biomed. Res. 3, Suppl., 131–136 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tranchina, D., Gordon, J. & Shapley, R. J. gen. Physiol. 82, 573–598 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baylor, D. A., Hodgkin, A. L. & Lamb, T. D. J. Physiol, Lond. 242, 759–791 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chappell, R. L., Sakuranaga, M. & Naka, K.-I. Neurosci. Abstr. 9, 687 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tranchina, D., Gordon, J. & Shapley, R. Retinal light adaptation—evidence for a feedback mechanism. Nature 310, 314–316 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/310314a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/310314a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing