Abstract
The development and interpretation of tomographic models of the Earth's mantle have usually proceeded under the assumption that fast and slow seismic velocity anomalies represent a spatially heterogeneous temperature field associated with mantle convection. Implicit in this approach is an assumption that either the effect of anisotropy on seismic velocities is small in comparison with isotropic thermal or compositional effects, or that the tomographic results represent the average isotropic heterogeneity, even if individual seismic observations are affected by anisotropic structure. For example, velocity anomalies in the upper portions of the oceanic mantle are commonly interpreted in terms of the progressive cooling1,2 (and localized reheating3) of amechanical and thermal boundary layer consisting of rigid oceanic lithosphere and an underlying, less viscous, asthenosphere. Here, however, we present results from a global three-dimensional tomographic model of shear-wave velocity which shows that the uppermost mantle beneath the central Pacific Ocean is considerably more complicated than this simple model. Over a broad area, with its centre near Hawaii, the seismic data reveal a regional anomaly in elastic anisotropy which produces variations of seismic velocities that are at least as large as those due to thermal effects. Because seismic anisotropy is an indicator of strain in Earth materials, our tomographic results canbe used to put constraints on both buoyancy forces (thermal effects) and flow patterns in the upper mantle.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhang, Y.-S. & Tanimoto, T. Ridges, hotspots and their interaction as observed in seismic velocity maps. Nature 355, 45–49 (1992).
Su, W.-J., Woodward, R. L. & Dziewonski, A. M. Deep origin of mid-ocean-ridge seismic velocity anomalies. Nature 359, 149–152 (1992).
McNutt, M. K. & Superswells. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. (in the press).
Ekström, G. & Dziewonski, A. M. Improved models of upper mantle S velocity structure. (abstr.) EOS 76(46), F421 (1995).
Su, W.-J., Woodward, R. L. & Dziewonski, A. M. Degree-12 model of shear velocity heterogeneity in the mantle. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 4945–4980 (1994).
Masters, G., Johnson, S., Laske, G. & Bolton, H. Ashear-velocity model of the mantle. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 354, 1385–1411 (1996).
Li, X.-D. & Romanowicz, B. Global mantle shear velocity model developed using nonlinear asymptotic coupling theory. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 22245–22272 (1996).
Nataf, H. C., Nakanishi, I. & Anderson, D. L. Anisotropy and shear-velocity heterogeneities in the upper mantle. Geophys. Res. Lett. 11, 109–112 (1984).
Nataf, H. C., Nakanishi, I. & Anderson, D. L. Measurements of mantle wave velocities and inversion for lateral heterogeneities and anisotropy. J. Geophys. Res. 91, 7261–7307 (1986).
Montagner, J.-P. & Tanimoto, T. Global anisotropy in the upper mantle inferred from the regionalization of phase velocities. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 4797–4819 (1990).
Montagner, J.-P. & Tanimoto, T. Global upper mantle tomography of seismic velocities and anisotropies. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 20337–20351 (1991).
McEvilly, T. V. Central US crust-upper mantle structure from Love and Rayleigh wave phase velocity inversion. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 54, 1997–2015 (1964).
Forsyth, D. W. The early structural evolution and anisotropy of the oceanic upper mantle. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 43, 103–162 (1975).
Mitchell, B. J. & Yu, G.-K. Surface wave dispersion, regionalized velocity models, and anisotropy of the Pacific crust and upper mantle. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 63, 497–514 (1980).
Gee, L. S. & Jordan, T. H. Polarization anisotropy and fine-scale structure of the Eurasian upper mantle. Geophys. Res. Lett. 15, 824–827 (1988).
Gaherty, J. B., Jordan, T. H. & Gee, L. S. Seismic structure of the upper mantle in a central Pacific corridor. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 22291–22309 (1996).
Nishimura, C. E. & Forsyth, D. W. Rayleigh wave phase velocities in the Pacific with implications for azimuthal anisotropy and lateral heterogeneities. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 94, 479–501 (1988).
Nishimura, C. E. & Forsyth, D. W. The anisotropic structure of the upper mantle in the Pacific. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 96, 203–229 (1989).
Dziewonski, A. M. & Anderson, D. L. Preliminary reference Earth model. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 25, 297–356 (1981).
Lévêque, J. J. & Cara, M. Long-period Love wave overtone data in North America and the Pacific Ocean: new evidence for upper mantle anisotropy. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 33, 164–179 (1983).
Gaherty, J. B., Kato, M. & Jordan, T. H. Seismological structure of the upper mantle: A regional comparison of seismic layering. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. (submitted).
Mitchell, B. J. On the inversion of Love and Rayleigh wave dispersion and implications for earth structure and anisotropy. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 76, 233–241 (1984).
Regan, J. & Anderson, D. L. Anisotropic models of the upper mantle. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 35, 227–263 (1984).
Birch, F. The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kilobars. J. Geophys. Res. 65, 1083–1102 (1960).
Nicolas, A. & Christensen, N. I. in Composition, Structure, and Dynamics of Lithosphere-Asthenosphere System (eds Fuchs, K. & Froidevaux, C.) 111–123 (Geodyn. Ser. Vol. 16, Am. Geophys. Union, Washington DC, (1987)).
Ribe, N. M. Seismic anisotropy and mantle flow. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 4213–4223 (1989).
Parsons, B. & McKenzie, D. Mantle convection and the thermal structure of the plates. J. Geophys. Res. 83, 4485–4496 (1978).
Dziewonski, A. M., Ekström, G. & Liu, X.-F. in Monitoring a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (eds Husebye, E. S. & Dainty, A. M.) 521–550 (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, (1996)).
Woodhouse, J. H. & Dziewonski, A. M. Mapping the upper mantle: Three dimensional modeling of Earth structure by inversion of seismic waveforms. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 5953–5986 (1984).
Ekström, G., Tromp, J. & Larson, E. W. F. Measurements and global models of surface wave propagation. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 8317–8157 (1997).
Love, A. E. H. A Treatise on the Theory of Elasticity4th edn (Cambridge Univ., (1927)).
Takeuchi, H. & Saito, M. Seismic surface waves. Methods Comput. Phys. 11, 217–295 (1972).
Mooney, W. D., Laske, G. & Masters, G. CRUST-5.1: A global crustal model at 5° × 5°. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 727–747 (1998).
Acknowledgements
The data used in this work were obtained from the IRIS, GDSN, IDA, GEOSCOPE, MEDNET, CDSN and GTSN seismograph networks. We thank D. Forsyth, J. Gaherty, J. Phipps Morgan, G. Smith and C. Wolfe for discussions, and X.-F. Liu, S. Sianissian and W.-J. Su for help with collecting and preparing the data sets. This work was supported by the US NSF and the US Air Force Office for Scientific Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ekström, G., Dziewonski, A. The unique anisotropy of the Pacific upper mantle. Nature 394, 168–172 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/28148
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/28148
This article is cited by
-
Resonance frequency of an orthotropic layer to non-principal vertically incident SH body and surface waves
Journal of Seismology (2023)
-
Large-scale variation in seismic anisotropy in the crust and upper mantle beneath Anatolia, Turkey
Communications Earth & Environment (2021)
-
Indication from finite-frequency tomography beneath the North China Craton: The heterogeneity of craton destruction
Science China Earth Sciences (2018)
-
Fast Computation of Global Sensitivity Kernel Database Based on Spectral-Element Simulations
Pure and Applied Geophysics (2017)
-
Effect of hydration on the elasticity of mantle minerals and its geophysical implications
Science China Earth Sciences (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.