Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Three amino acids of the oestrogen receptor are essential to its ability to distinguish an oestrogen from a glucocorticoid-responsive element

Abstract

STEROID hormone receptors activate specific gene transcription by binding as hormone-receptor complexes to DNA enhancer elements termed hormone responsive elements (refs 1, 2 and references therein). A highly conserved 66-amino-acid region of the oestrogen and glucocorticoid receptors which corresponds to part of the receptor DNA-binding domain (region C) determines the specificity of target gene recognition3–5. This region contains two subregions (CI and CII), encoded in two separate exons (refs 1, 7 and references therein), that are analogous to the 'zinc fingers' of the transcription factor TFIIIA (reviewed in ref. 6). The N-terminal CI finger determines the recognition specificity of the hormone responsive element8. A chimaeric oestrogen receptor, in which the CI finger is replaced with the corresponding glucocorticoid receptor CI finger region, activates transcription from a reporter gene containing a glucocorticoid-responsive element, but not from a reporter gene containing an oestrogen-responsive element8. We report here that three amino acids located at the C-terminal side of the oestrogen receptor CI finger play a key part in this specificity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Green, S. & Chambon, P. Trends Genet 4, 309–314 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Evans, R. M. Science 240, 889–895 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Green, S. & Chambon, P. Nature 325, 75–78 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar, V. et al Cell 51, 941–951 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar, V. & Chambon, P. Cell 55, 145–156 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klug, A. & Rhodes, D. Trends biochem. Sci 12, 464–469 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ponglkitmongkol, M., Green, S. & Chambon, P. EMBO J. 7, 3385–3388 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Green, S., Kumar, V., Theulaz, I., Wahli, W. & Chambon, P. EMBO J. 7, 3037–3044 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Klein-Hitpaß, L., Schorpp, M., Wagner, U. & Ryffel, G. U. Cell 46, 1053–1061 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berg, J. M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 99–102 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gibson, T. J., Postma, J. P. M., Brown, R. S. & Argos, P. Protein Engng 2, 209–218 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Witte, M. M. & Dickson, R. C. Molec. cell. Biol. 8, 3726–3733 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Klock, G., Strähle, U. & Schütz, G. Nature 329, 734–736 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Martinez, E., Givel, F. & Wahli, W. EMBO J. 6, 3719–3727 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ham, J., Thompson, A., Needham, M., Webb, P. & Parker, M. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 5263–5276 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Arriza, J. L. et al. Science 237, 268–275 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Umesono, K., Giguère, V., Glass, C. K., Rosenfeld, M. G. & Evans, R. M. Nature 336, 262–265 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Petkovtah, M., Brand, N. J., Krust, A. & Chambon, P. Nature 330, 444–450 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Green, S., Issemann, I. & Scheer, E. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 369 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Misrahi, M. et al. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 143, 740–748 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang, C., Kokontis, J. & Liao, S. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 7211–7215 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hollenberg, S. M. et al. Nature 318, 635–641 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Green, S. et al. Nature 320, 134–139 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brand, N. et al. Nature 332, 850–853 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Weinberger, C. et al. Nature 324, 641–646 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Baker, A. R. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 85, 3294–3298 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mader, S., Kumar, V., de Verneuil, H. et al. Three amino acids of the oestrogen receptor are essential to its ability to distinguish an oestrogen from a glucocorticoid-responsive element. Nature 338, 271–274 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/338271a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/338271a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing