Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Evidence from a New Zealand snail for the maintenance of sex by parasitism

Abstract

The widespread occurrence of sexual reproduction is an important problem in evolutionary theory, because of the cost of producing males in dioecious organisms and the allocation of limited resources in cosexes1–4. Here I compare the predictions of the major ecological hypotheses on the maintenance of sex by examining male frequency in Potamopyrgus antipodarum, a dioecious freshwater snail with both sexual and parthenogenetic populations5. The results do not-support the view that sex is maintained by a variable physical environment6–9, but they are consistent with the idea that sex is favoured by selection resulting from host–parasite interactions10–14.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 1. Maynard Smith, J. in Group Selection (ed. Williams, G. C.) 163–175 (Aldine Atherton, Chicago, 1971). 2. Williams, G. C. Sex and Evolution (Princeton University Press, 1975). 3.Maynard Smith, J. The Evolution of Sex (Cambridge University Press, 1978). 4. Lloyd, D. G. in Evolutionary Biology Vol. 13 (eds Hecht, M. K., Steere, W. C. & Wallace, B.) 69–111 (Plenum, New York, 1980). 5. Winterbourn, M. Malacologia 10, 283–321 (1970). 6. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Evolution (Oxford University Press, 1930). 7. Muller, H. J. Am. Nat. 66, 118–138 (1932). 8. Ghiselin, M. T. The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1974). 9. Bell, G. The Masterpiece of Nature (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1982). 10. Jaenike, J. Evol. Theory 3, 191–194 (1978). 11. Hamilton, W. D. Oikos 35, 282–290 (1980). 12. Levin, D. Am. Nat. 109, 437–451 (1975). 13. Rice, W. R. Am. Nat. 121, 1317–1320 (1983). 14. Bremermann, H. J. J. theor. Biol. 87, 641–702 (1980). 15. Price, M. V. & Waser, N. M. Evolution 36, 35–43 (1982). 16. Levine, H. Am. Nat. 87, 331–333 (1953). 17. Maynard Smith, J. 1970. Am. Nat. 140, 487–490 (1970). 18. Strobeck, C. Am. Nat. 108, 152–156 (1974). 19. Hamilton, W. D. in Population Biology of Infectious Diseases (eds Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M.) 269–296 (Springer, New York, 1982). 20. Maynard Smith, J. in The Evolution of Sex: an Examination of Current Ideas (eds Levin, B. R. & Michod, R. E.) (Sinuaer Sunderland, Massachusetts, in the press). 21. Hynes, H. B. N. The Ecology of Running Waters (Liverpool University Press, 1970). 22. Winterbourn, M. J., Rounick, J. S. & Cowie, B. N. Z. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 15, 321–328 (1981). 23. Lloyd, D. G. in The Evolution of Sex: An Examination of Current Ideas (eds. Levin, B. R. & Michod, R. E.) (Sinuaer Sunderland, Massachusetts, in the press). 24. Winterbourn, M. J. Mauri Ora 2, 17–30 (1973). 25. May, R. M. & Anderson, R. M. Nature 280, 455–461 (1979). 26. Phillips, N. thesis Univ. Auckland (1987). 27. Jaenike, J. & Selander, R. K. Am. Zool. 19, 729–737 (1979). 28. Ellstrand, N. C. & Antonovics, J. Evolution 39, 657–666 (1985). 29. Antonovics, J. & Ellstrand, N. C. Evolution 38, 103–115 (1984). 30. Schmitt, J. & Antonovics, J. Evolution 40, 818–829 (1986). 31. McArthur, C. P. & Featherston, D. W. N. Z. J. Zool 3, 35–38 (1976). 32. Richards, C. S. Parasitology 70, 231–241 (1975). 33. Newton, W. L. Expl Parasit. 2, 252–257 (1953). 34. Richards, C. S. & Merritt, J. W. Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 21, 425–434 (1972). 35. Wallace, C. J. Malac. Soc. Aust. 4, 263 (1980). 36. Case, T. J. & Taper, M. L. Evolution 40, 366–387 (1986). 37.Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry 2nd edn (Freeman, New York, 1981).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lively, C. Evidence from a New Zealand snail for the maintenance of sex by parasitism. Nature 328, 519–521 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/328519a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/328519a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing