Abstract
Observations1–3 reveal a large seasonal decrease in the column density of ozone during Antarctic early spring, followed by a rapid increase after October beyond its pre-spring value. Given the unique circumstances that exist in the Antarctic environment— relatively stable circumpolar vortex, cold air temperature achieved during polar night, and the increase in absorption of solar radiation by ozone as the Sun returns—we surmise the existence of a reverse circulation cell with rising motion in the polar lower stratosphere. The upwelling brings ozone-poor air from below 100 mbar to the stratosphere, possibly contributing to the observed ozone decline in early spring. At the same time, the Antarctic stratosphere might contain a very low concentration (<0.1 p.p.b.v. (parts per 109 by volume) of NOx(NO + NO2), a condition that could favour a greatly enhanced catalytic removal of O3 by halogen species2,4,5. We argue that heterogeneous processes and formation of OC1O by the reaction BrO + ClO → OClO + Br before and after the polar night might help to suppress the NOX levels during the early spring period. However, the dilution of the concentrations of the chlorine species by the upwelling may reduce the effectiveness of the photochemical removal of O3.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chubachi, S. in Proc. Quadrenn. Ozone Symp. (eds Zerefos, C. S. & Ghazi, A.) (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1985).
Farman, J. C., Gardina, B. G. & Shanklin, J. D. Nature 315, 207–210 (1985).
Stolarski, R. S. et al. Nature 322, 808 (1986).
McElroy, M. B., Salawitch, R. J., Wofsy, S. C. & Logan, J. A. Nature 321, 759–761 (1986).
Solomon, S., Garcia, R. R., Rowland, F. S. & Wuebbles, D. J. Nature 321, 755–758 (1986).
Brewer, A. W. Q. Jl R. met. Soc. 75, 351–363 (1949).
Dobson, G. M. B. Proc. R. Soc. A235, 187–192 (1956).
Murgatroyd, R. J. & Singleton, F. Q. Jl R. met. Soc. 87, 125–135 (1961).
Dunkerton, T. J atmos. Sci. 35, 2325–2333 (1978).
Tung, K. K. J. atmos. Sci. 39, 2230–2355 (1982).
Ko, M. K. W., Tung, K. K., Weisenstein, D. K. & Sze, N. D. J. geophys. Res. 90, 2313–2329 (1985).
Solomon, S., Garcia, R. R. & Stordal, F. J. geophys. Res. 90, 12981–12990 (1985).
Dütsch, H. U. Pure appl. Geophys. 116, 511–529 (1978).
Bowman, K. P. & Krueger, A. J. J geophys. Res. 90, 7967–7976 (1985).
McIntyre, M. E. J. met. Soc. Japan 60, 37–65 (1982).
McIntyre, M. E. & Palmer, T. N. Nature 3205, 593 (1983).
Murgatroyd, R. J. in The Global Circulation of the Atmosphere (ed. Corky, G. A.) (Royal Meteorological Society, London, 1969).
Fels, S. B., Mahlman, J. D., Schwarzkopf, M. D. & Sinclair, R. W. J. atmos. Sci. 37, 2265–2297 (1980).
Wehrbein, W. M. & Leovy, C. B. J. atmos. Sci. 39, 1532–1544 (1982).
WMO/NASA, Atmospheric Ozone: Assessment of our Understanding of the Process Controlling its Present Distribution and Changes (in the press).
Kiehl, J. T. & Solomon, S. J. atmos. Sci. (in the press).
Kent, G. S., Trepte, C. R., Farrukh, U. O. & McCormick, M. P. J. atmos. Sci. 42, 1536–1551 (1985).
Yung, Y. L., Pinto, J. P., Watson, R. T. & Sanders, S. P. J. atmos. Sci. 37, 339–353 (1980).
Ko, M. K. W. & Sze, N. D. J. geophys. Res. 89, 11619–11632 (1984).
Clyne, M. A. A. & Watson, R. T. JCS Faraday Trans. 1, 73, 1169 (1977).
Wofsy, S. C. J geophys. Res. 83, 364–378 (1978).
Turco, R., Hamill, P., Toon, O. B., Whitten, R. C. & Kiang, S. S. J. atmos. Sci. 36, 699 (1979).
McCormick, M. P., Steele, H. M., Hamill, P., Chu, W. P. & Swissler, T. J. J. atmos. Sci. 39, 1387–1397 (1982).
Hoffman, D. J. & Rosen, J. M. Geophys. Res. Lett. 12, 13–16 (1985).
Mugnai, A., Fiocco, G. & Grams, G. Q. Jl R met. Soc. 104, 783–796 (1978).
Strobel, D. F. J geophys. Res. 83, 6225–6230 (1978).
Rowland, F. S., Sato, H., Ichwaja, H., Elliott, S. M. J. Phys. Chem. 90, 1985–1988 (1986).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tung, KK., Ko, M., Rodriguez, J. et al. Are Antarctic ozone variations a manifestation of dynamics or chemistry?. Nature 322, 811–814 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/322811a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/322811a0
This article is cited by
-
Summertime surface N2O concentration observed on fildes Peninsula Antarctica: Correlation with total atmospheric O3 and solar activity
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences (2004)
-
Extension of Antarctic ozone hole to lower latitudes in the South-American region
Pure and Applied Geophysics PAGEOPH (1991)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.