Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
SEARCH JOURNAL     advanced search
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 314, 73 - 75 (07 March 1985); doi:10.1038/314073a0

Cometary impacts, molecular clouds, and the motion of the Sun perpendicular to the galactic plane

Patrick Thaddeus*† & Gary A. Chanan

*Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, New York, New York 10025, USA
Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Department of Physics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA

Raup and Sepkoski1 have presented evidence from marine fossils for a 26-Myr periodicity in the occurrence of mass extinctions. Using the same data Rampino and Stothers2 obtained a different period, 30plusminus1 Myr, which agrees with the 33plusminus3-Myr half-period for the vertical oscillation of the Solar System about the plane of the galaxy3. To explain this agreement they suggest2 that encounters with molecular clouds perturb the Sun's family of comets, causing many to enter the inner Solar System where one or more collide with the Earth; the cloud encounter rate is modulated at twice the oscillation frequency, because the number density of clouds peaks at the galactic plane at the midpoint of the solar oscillation crossed by the Solar System twice per period. Notwithstanding an apparent objection to this that the most recent extinctions are not in phase with the solar oscillation4, their model, given its stochastic nature, can accommodate a few events with large phase discrepancies. The degree of modulation is crucial: it depends on the scale height of the population of molecular clouds relative to the amplitude of the solar motion and tends to zero if this ratio is large and encounters are entirely random. Here we present data from CO surveys of molecular clouds both within and beyond the solar circle, which permit explicit calculation of the strength of the modulation. The cloud layer near the Sun is too extended and, as a consequence, the modulation of cloud encounters is too weak for a statistically significant period to be extracted from the nine extinctions analysed by Rampino and Stothers.

------------------

References
1. Raup, D. & Sepkoski, J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 801−805 (1984). | ChemPort |
2. Rampino, M. R. & Stothers, R. B. Nature 308, 709−712 (1984). | ISI |
3. Innanen, K. A., Patrick, A. T. & Duley, W. W. Astrophys. Space Sci. 57, 511−515 (1978). | ISI |
4. Davis, M., Hut, P. & Muller, R. A. Nature 308, 715−717 (1984). | ISI |
5. Bahcall, J. Astrophys. J. 276, 156−168 (1984). | Article | ISI |
6. Thaddeus, P. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 395, 9−16 (1982). | ChemPort |
7. Allen, C. W. Astrophysical Quantities, 252 (Athlone, London, 1973).
8. Dame, T. M. & Thaddeus, P. Bull. Am Astr. Soc. 14, 616 (1982).
9. Casoli, F., Combes, F. & Gerin, M. Astr. Astrophys. 133, 99−109 (1984). | ISI |
10. Bailey, M. E. Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 204, 603−633 (1983). | ISI |
11. Sanders, D. B., Solomon, P. M. & Scoville, N. Z. Astrophys. J. 276, 182−203 (1984). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |



© 1985 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy