Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Is there a local source of magnetic monopoles?

Abstract

Cabrera1 has reported the possible detection of a magnetic monopole in flight with magnetic charge g given by the Dirac condition2 2eg = hc. Here, we accept the Cabrera candidate as a t'Hooft–Polyakov3,4 monopole of mass M 1016 GeV as expected5 in SU(5) or other grand unified theories. The monopole flux on Earth, on the basis of the single candidate, is f(0.1) cm−2 yr−1 (2πsr)−1, presumably consisting of roughly equal numbers of north and south monopoles. Galactic or intergalactic monopoles will have typical velocities of 300 km s−1. The Cabrera flux would correspond to a mass density f M/v 1 GeV cm−3. Because the mean mass density of the Universe cannot exceed 10−5 GeV cm−3, the mean flux of monopoles in the Universe must be at least five orders of magnitude smaller than f (refs 6,7). This would not be a problem if the monopoles were concentrated in the Galaxy. However, Parker has shown8 that the existence of galactic magnetic fields is inconsistent with a mean galactic monopole flux of 10−7 cm−2 yr−1. It follows that f must be a local flux resulting from the special nature of the observation site. Three possibilities come to mind: the local monopole flux may be associated with the Earth, the Sun, or with the Solar System as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cabrera, B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1378–1381 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dirac, P. A. M. Proc. R. Soc. A133, 60–72 (1931); Phys. Rev. 74, 817–830 (1948).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. t'Hooft, G. Nucl. Phys. B79, 276–284 (1974); B105, 538–547 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Polyakov, A. M. Pis'ma Ekxp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 430–433 (1974); JETP Lett. 20, 194–195 (1974).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Georgi, H. & Glashow, S. L. Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438–441 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Preskill, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1365 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lazarides, G., Shafi, Q. & Walsh, T. F. Phys. Lett. 100B, 21–24 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Parker, E. N. Astrophys. J. 160, 383–404 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Parker, E. N. Astrophys. J. 139, 951–958 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilczek, F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1146–1149 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Callan, C. Dyon-Fermion Dynamics (Princeton University Preprint, May 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dimopoulos, S., Glashow, S., Purcell, E. et al. Is there a local source of magnetic monopoles?. Nature 298, 824–825 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/298824a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/298824a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing