Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
SEARCH JOURNAL     advanced search
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 298, 350 - 354 (22 July 1982); doi:10.1038/298350a0

Evidence for an oblique magnetic solar rotator

D. O. Gough

Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK

The observation by Claverie et al. 1. of fine structure in the peaks in the power spectrum of low-degree 5-min solar oscillations has been interpreted as being a result of rotational splitting. Claverie et al. 1 claim that their measurements imply that an appropriately weighted average bold Omega macr of the interior angular velocity Omega(r) of the Sun is about twice the value of Omega at the surface. At first sight their claim looks doubtful, because all 2l + 1 components of the set of modes of degree l appear in the spectrum, whereas only l + 1 of them should be detectable. However, Isaak2 has recently speculated that the additional components are produced by an intense rotating magnetic core, such as had been postulated by Dicke3,4 to account for the 12.2-day periodic component in the Princeton oblateness data5−9. Isaak2 pointed out that the mean period 2pi/Omegasime15 days of the solar interior that was inferred from the Birmingham data1 is consistent with a central core rotating with the 12.2-day period and an outer envelope rotating with the photosphere. Moreover, his rough estimate of a few megagauss for the r.m.s. magnetic field that is required to support his conjecture is within about a factor 10 of that required by Dicke3. Thence he concluded that the Birmingham data1 provide the first clear empirical evidence for an intense internal solar magnetic field. Here I examine this evidence in more detail, and show that the conclusion is premature. If the magnetic core does exist, the 5-min oscillations provide no clear evidence that it is rotating rapidly. Furthermore, unless one accepts a contrived magnetic-field configuration, an explanation for the 2l + 1 components of the multiplets is still lacking.

------------------

References
1. Claverie, A., Isaak, G. R., McLeod, C. P. & van der Raay, H. B. Nature 293, 443−445 (1981). | ISI |
2. Isaak, G. R. Nature 296, 130−131 (1982). | ISI |
3. Dicke, R. H. Proc. Informal Conf. on Status and Future of Solar Neutrino Research Vol. 2 (ed. Friedlander, G.) 109−143 (Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, 1978).
4. Dicke, R. H. New Scient. 83, 12−14 (1979). | ISI |
5. Dicke, R. H. & Goldenberg, H. M. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 27, 131−182 (1974). | Article | ISI |
6. Dicke, R. H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1240−1242 (1976). | Article | ISI |
7. Dicke, R. H. Solar Phys. 47, 475−515 (1976). | ISI |
8. Dicke, R. H. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 1309−1312 (1981).
9. Dicke, R. H. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 1989−1993 (1981).
10. Grec, G., Fossat, E. & Pomerantz, M. Nature 288, 541−544 (1980). | ISI |
11. Fossat, E., Grec, G. & Pomerantz, M. Solar Phys. 74, 59−63 (1981). | ISI |
12. Deubner, F.-L. Nature 290, 682−683 (1981). | ISI |
13. Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. & Gough, D. O. Nature 288, 544−547 (1980). | ChemPort |
14. Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. Proc. 5th Eur. Meet. in Astronomy (ed. Ledoux, P.) A.1.1−A.1.28 (Institut d'Astrophysique, Liège, 1980). | ChemPort |
15. Scuflaire, R., Gabriel, M. & Noels, A. Astr. Astrophys. 99, 39−42 (1981). | ISI |
16. Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. & Gough, D. O. Astr. Astrophys. 104, 173−176 (1981). | ChemPort |
17. Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. & Gough, D. O. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 198, 141−171 (1982). | ChemPort |
18. Vandakurov, Yu, V. Astr. Zh. 44, 786−797 (1967).
19. Gough, D. O. Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 196, 731−745 (1981). | ISI |
20. Brookes, J. R., Isaak, G. R. & van der Raay, H. B. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 185, 1−17 (1978). | ISI | ChemPort |
21. Scherrer, P. H., Wilcox, J. M., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. & Gough, D. O. Solar Phys. (in the press).
22. Ledoux, P. & Simon, R. Ann. Astr. 20, 185−195 (1957).
23. Goossens, M. Astrophys. Space Sci. 16, 386−404 (1972). | ISI |
24. Goossens, M., Smeyers, P. & Denis, J. Astrophys. Space Sci. 39, 257−272 (1976). | ISI |
25. Biront, D., Goossens, M., Cousens, A. & Mestel, M. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. (in the press).
26. Mestel, L., Q. Jl R. astr. Soc. 12, 402−416 (1971).
27. Mestel, L. & Takhar, H. S. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 156, 419−436 (1972). | ISI |
28. Mestel, L., Nittman, J., Wood, W. P. & Wright, G. A. E. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 195, 979−1000 (1981). | ISI |
29. Dicke, R. H. Solar Phys. 78, 3−16 (1982). | ISI |
30. Hill, H. A. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1497−1500 (1974). | Article | ISI |
31. Bos, R., Goode, P. R. & Hill, H. A. Phys. Rev. Lett. (submitted).
32. Gough, D. O. Nature 298, 334−339 (1982). | Article | ISI |



© 1982 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy