Abstract
Increased crop yields are required to support rapid population growth worldwide. Grain weight is a key component of rice yield, but the underlying molecular mechanisms that control it remain elusive. Here, we report the cloning and characterization of a new quantitative trait locus (QTL) for the control of rice grain length, weight and yield. This locus, GL3.1, encodes a protein phosphatase kelch (PPKL) family — Ser/Thr phosphatase. GL3.1 is a member of the large grain WY3 variety, which is associated with weaker dephosphorylation activity than the small grain FAZ1 variety. GL3.1-WY3 influences protein phosphorylation in the spikelet to accelerate cell division, thereby resulting in longer grains and higher yields. Further studies have shown that GL3.1 directly dephosphorylates its substrate, Cyclin-T1;3, which has only been rarely studied in plants. The downregulation of Cyclin-T1;3 in rice resulted in a shorter grain, which indicates a novel function for Cyclin-T in cell cycle regulation. Our findings suggest a new mechanism for the regulation of grain size and yield that is driven through a novel phosphatase-mediated process that affects the phosphorylation of Cyclin-T1;3 during cell cycle progression, and thus provide new insight into the mechanisms underlying crop seed development. We bred a new variety containing the natural GL3.1 allele that demonstrated increased grain yield, which indicates that GL3.1 is a powerful tool for breeding high-yield crops.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The global population is expected to reach 9.1 billion by 20501, which would require each hectare of land to feed 43 people2. However, various factors, such as water scarcity, soil salinity, disease, climate change and reduced arable land area will intensify food shortages in the next 50 years3,4,5; therefore, improvements in crop yields are urgently required. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the most important crops worldwide, and it is a major staple in Asia, which contains 66.67% of the world's population. Improved rice yields could prevent global food shortages. Since the middle of the 20th century, yield increases in the dominant short-stature rice cultivars, which were developed in Asia during the Green Revolution, have stagnated6, and new methods are urgently required to help breeders to continue to increase rice yields. The characterization of the functions of genes that control agricultural traits in rice may provide new opportunities for breeding. Rice yield depends on three major components: grain weight, grain number per panicle and panicle number per plant (tiller number). Several genes associated with these traits (or quantitative trait loci, QTLs) have been isolated recently7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21; however, the pathways regulated by these genes have not been characterized. As QTLs control most rice yield traits, the identification of these genes may facilitate the breeding of high-yield rice varieties.
Post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation, ubiquitination, glycosylation and acetylation, can alter protein function. One-third of all proteins are either phosphorylated or dephosphorylated, and phosphorylation regulates many cellular events/activities, such as enzymatic activity, substrate specificity, protein subcellular localization, and protein turnover/stability22. Of the nine amino acids that can be phosphorylated, serine, threonine and tyrosine are the major amino acids that affect protein functions23. Phosphatases can be divided into groups based on their substrate specificities: serine/threonine-specific phosphoprotein phosphatases (PPP), metal-independent protein phosphatases (PPM; also known as PP2Cs), tyrosine-specific phosphotyrosine phosphatases (PTP) and dual (serine/threonine and tyrosine)-specific phosphatases (DSP)24. The PPP family can be further divided into several subfamilies based on substrate specificity and pharmacological properties: protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), PP2 (including PP2A and PP2B), PP4, PP5, PP6, PP7 and PPP kelch (PPKL)25,26,27. The PPKL protein family contains an N-terminal kelch-repeat domain and a C-terminal phosphatase domain, and these enzymes are more closely related to PP1 than to PP2A on the basis of conserved residues28,29. PPKLs only exist in plants, green algae and several Alveolata species30, and they include Plasmodium falciparum PfPPα31, BSU132 and Arabidopsis BSU1-like protein 1 (BSL1), BSL2 and BSL330,33. BSU1 is important in the brassinolide signaling pathway34. BSU1 receives a signal from BRI1 and inhibits the activity of BIN2; subsequently, BZR1, which is suppressed by BIN2, induces the expression of BR-response genes. However, the functions of other PPKLs remain poorly characterized.
In the present study, we cloned and characterized a new QTL, GL3.1, which regulates grain length and yield in rice. GL3.1 is a novel serine/threonine phosphatase that belongs to the PPKL family. GL3.1 regulates grain length by mediating cell cycle progression through affecting the phosphorylation status of cell cycle proteins, such as Cyclin-T1;3, thereby controlling grain yield. These findings provide insight into seed development and establish a new tool for improved crop breeding.
Results
Fine-mapping of a new QTL, GL3.1, which regulates rice grain yield
Fengaizhan-1 (FAZ1) and Waiyin-3 (WY3) rice varieties were selected as parents to map the QTLs that affect grain length. FAZ1 is a small grain indica variety (1 000-grain weight: 20.18 ± 0.89 g), whereas WY3 is a larger grain japonica variety (1 000-grain weight: 43.40 ± 0.92 g; Figure 1A). We fine-mapped a new major QTL (GL3.1) for grain length to a 20-kb region between the L012 and L008 markers on chromosome 3 (25 036 192 bp to 25 060 567 bp at chromosome 3) (Figure 1B), which is distinct from other previously reported QTLs35,36,37,38. This region contains two genes: Os03g44510, which is a predicted transposon that was excluded from further analysis because the transcript was not detected in both parents, and the predicted phosphatase Os03g44500, which was expressed in both parents and considered as the GL3.1 candidate.
Based on the mapping results, we developed a near-isogenic line (NIL) from BC4F2 generations that contained a 30-kb WY3 chromosomal region at the GL3.1 locus in a FAZ1 genetic background (Figure 1C; Supplementary information, Figure S1A–S1C). NIL had longer grains (+16.1%) than FAZ1 (10.71 ± 0.13 mm vs 9.22 ± 0.09 mm), but there were no significant differences in grain width or thickness (Figure 1D–1F), plant height or tiller number (Supplementary information, Figure S1D–S1E). NIL had a significantly greater 1 000-grain weight than FAZ1 (+43.5%; Figure 1G) and reduced grain number per main panicle (21.3%, Supplementary information, Figure S1F). NIL exhibited an increase in the milk filling rate (Figure 1H–1I) and higher expression of milk filling-related genes (Supplementary information, Figure S1G). The plot grain yield was significantly increased in NIL (+ 11.1%; Figure 1J); however, the grain quality was not affected, as the packing density of starch granules was similar in the mature seeds of NIL and FAZ1 (Supplementary information, Figure S1H–S1I), and the chalky grain percentage and protein and amylose contents were similar between the NIL and FAZ1 grains (Supplementary information, Figure S1J–S1L). We crossed NIL with Huanghuazhan, which is a relatively high-yield elite indica variety that is widely cultivated in Southern China, and subsequently backcrossed the F1 generation with Huanghuazhan to obtain a Huanghuazhan (GL3.1) variety that exhibited a longer and heavier grain (Supplementary information, Figure S2A–S2E) and a higher grain yield than Huanghuazhan under field conditions (Supplementary information, Figure S2F). These findings confirmed that GL3.1 potentially increases grain yield.
Confirmation of GL3.1 function
GL3.1 contains a 3 012-bp open reading frame (ORF) that encodes 21 exons and 20 introns. The FAZ1 GL3.1 allele contains 4-bp differences when compared with the WY3 GL3.1 allele (FAZ1 to WY3: 1092C-A, 1495C-T, 2643A-G, 2838T-C), which results in two amino acid substitutions (364 aspartic acid — glutamic acid (364D-E), 499 histidine — tyrosine (499H-Y); Figure 2A). We sequenced GL3.1 in several large grain varieties and detected the japonica variety Nanyangzhan with a truncated GL3.1 allele as well as Jizi1560 and Jizi1581, which contained 15 additional amino acids at the C-terminus compared with FAZ1 and WY3. At the positions 364 and 499, Jizi1560 and Jizi1581 exhibited the same amino acid substitutions as WY3 (Supplementary information, Figure S3). Transgenic rice plants were generated to determine whether GL3.1 controls grain length. FAZ1 and WY3 failed to regenerate shoots from the callus, and therefore we used the small-grain japonica variety Zhonghua 11, which was easily regenerated39. We generated constructs containing the full-length GL3.1 ORFs from FAZ1 or WY3 under the CaMV 35S promoter. Some of the obtained transgenic lines that overexpressed the WY3 GL3.1 allele showed an increased grain length (GL3.1-WY3), whereas the grain length was not changed in all lines overexpressing the FAZ1 GL3.1 allele (GL3.1-FAZ1; data not shown). Only the GL3.1-WY3 line, which expressed relatively high levels of GL3.1-WY3, exhibited increases in grain length (Figure 2B–2D, Supplementary information, Figure S4A–S4B), which confirms that GL3.1 controls grain length. GL3.1-FAZ1 RNA interference (RNAi) and antisense transgenic plants were generated; however, no phenotypic changes in grain length were observed (data not shown). We also observed that GL3.1 was downregulated but not completely suppressed in these lines; therefore, we hypothesized that these lines retained adequate GL3.1 function, as GL3.1 was abundantly expressed.
GL3.1 is predicted to encode a Ser/Thr phosphatase of unknown function and with two predicted domains: a Kelch_1 protein interaction domain and a Ser/Thr phosphatase domain (Figure 2A). Transgenic plants were generated to investigate the effect of the GL3.1 point substitutions GL3.1-M1 (364E, 499H) and GL3.1-M2 (364D, 499Y) in FAZ1 and WY3. Both transgenic lines exhibited significant increases in grain length (Supplementary information, Figure S4C–S4H). Similar to the GL3.1-WY3 transgenic lines, only high levels of GL3.1-M1 or GL3.1-M2 overexpression led to enhanced grain length. These results suggest that the 364D-E and 499H-Y substitutions both influence the function of GL3.1.
GL3.1 functions as a Ser/Thr phosphatase
Although some nucleotides were different between the promoters of FAZ1 and WY3, the GL3.1 expression pattern remained similar (Supplementary information, Figure S5). GL3.1 was expressed in all organs and developmental stages tested in FAZ1 and NIL (Supplementary information, Figure S6A–S6C). Notably, expression of GL3.1 was higher in the panicle of NIL at the heading stage than in the panicle of FAZ1 (Figure 3A) and lower in the calluses from FAZ1 and NIL, which primarily consist of dividing cells (Supplementary information, Figure S6D). GL3.1 in both parents was detected throughout the entire cell (Figure 3B). Purified GL3.1-FAZ1 and GL3.1-WY3 dephosphorylated myelin basic protein (MyBP; a standard substrate) in vitro, which demonstrates that GL3.1 is a functional Ser/Thr phosphatase (Figure 3C); however, GL3.1-FAZ1 exhibited higher activity than GL3.1-WY3. In addition, GL3.1 from Nanyangzhan (GL3.1-NYZ) did not show dephosphorylation ability (Figure 3C). GL3.1 was insensitive to both okadaic acid (OA) and Inhibitor 2 (Figure 3D), which suggests that GL3.1 may encode a novel type of PPKL, as the PPKL and PP1 enzymes are generally sensitive to Inhibitor 227, whereas the PPKL family member BSU1 is sensitive to OA32. Furthermore, we observed that the phosphatase domain of GL3.1 was also not sensitive to these two inhibitors (Supplementary information, Figure S6E). A comparative analysis of phosphatases that are typically sensitive to OA revealed that 929G in GL3.1 conferred resistance to OA (Supplementary information, Figure S7). According to a previous study40 in rats, PP2Aα is sensitive to OA, but the Y267G mutant of this protein is resistant to OA, which indicates that Y267G is a key mutation for OA resistance. Alignment analysis revealed that 267Y in rat PP2Aα corresponds to 929G in GL3.1, which suggests that GL3.1 harbors a Y to G mutation at this key site that may be responsible for the OA insensitivity of GL3.1.
GL3.1 regulates spikelet hull cell division
We measured the lemma cell length to determine whether GL3.1 regulates grain length. There were no significant differences in cell length at the central point of the lemma in the vertical orientation (Figure 4A–4B, Supplementary information, Figure S6F) and the distance between tubercles at the outer spikelet hull surface (Figure 4C–4D, Supplementary information, Figure S6G), which indicates that cell length is not responsible for the difference in grain length between FAZ1 and NIL. As the FAZ1 and NIL life cycles and heading days are similar, we hypothesized that an increased rate of cell division may be responsible for the longer spikelet hull in NIL. Therefore, we assessed the cell division rate during different developmental stages of the spikelet hull in the two parents. The detection points were set at the stages when the spikelet hull length reached 25%, 50%, 65%, 80% and 100% of the full spikelet hull length in FAZ1 and NIL, and the percentage of cells with 4C DNA content in the spikelet hull as well as the cell lengths at the central zone of the spikelet hull at these points were also recorded (Figure 4E, Supplementary information, Figure S6F). At the five detection points, the cell length in the vertical orientation was not different between FAZ1 and NIL. Notably, at 50% of full spikelet hull length, the percentage of cells with a 4C DNA content was significantly higher in NIL than in FAZ1 (Figure 4E). Consistent with this, the expression of cell cycle-related genes was significantly higher in the NIL than in the FAZ1 spikelet (Figure 4F). Therefore, we propose that rapid cell division occurs in NIL during spikelet hull development. Furthermore, we synchronized cells from FAZ1 and NIL using hydroxycarbamide, which blocks cell division at the G1/S boundary. 8 h after release from hydroxycarbamide, the expression of Histone H4 was maximal in FAZ1 and NIL (Supplementary information, Figure S6H), which suggests that the cells from FAZ1 and NIL had entered the S phase. In addition, a higher percentage of cells with 4C DNA content and a lower percentage of cells in S phase were observed in NIL when compared with FAZ1 (Figure 4G–4I), which implies that more cells from NIL completed DNA duplication. We also observed that the maximal expression of CYCD4;1, which was expressed from early G2 phase to M phase, was earlier in NIL (28 h after release) than in FAZ1 (32 h after release) (Supplementary information, Figure S6I), which implies faster entry into the G2 phase in NIL cells. Furthermore, we synchronized cells from FAZ1 and NIL using nocodazole, which blocks cell division at the G2/M boundary. The expression of CYCD3;1, which is specifically expressed at the G1/S stage, remained the same between FAZ1 and NIL (Supplementary information, Figure S6J), which implies that the transformation from the G2 phase to G1 phase was not different between the two parents. These results suggest that the transformation from G1 to G2 may be accelerated in NIL. Thus, our results collectively demonstrate that the GL3.1-WY3 allele increases the rate of cell division during spikelet hull development compared with the GL3.1-FAZ1 allele, which results in a longer spikelet hull.
GL3.1 interacts with Cyclin-T1;3 to regulate grain length
To determine the mechanism underlying the GL3.1-mediated regulation of grain size, a yeast two-hybrid system was used to screen a cDNA library constructed from Zhonghua 11 spikelets using GL3.1-FAZ1 as bait. We identified 23 interacting proteins, of which Os11g05850, annotated as Cyclin-T1;3, was selected for further analysis (Figure 5A). The expression of Cyclin-T1;3 was localized to the nucleus of Arabidopsis protoplasts (Figure 5B), which was consistent with the expression pattern observed in humans. When GL3.1 was co-expressed with Cyclin-T1;3, increased accumulation of GL3.1 was observed in the nuclei from both parents when compared with expression without Cyclin-T1;3 (Figures 5C and 3B). We confirmed that GL3.1 dephosphorylated Cyclin-T1;3 in vitro. GL3.1-FAZ1 exhibited stronger Cyclin-T1;3 dephosphorylation activity than GL3.1-WY3, GL3.1-M1 and GL3.1-M2 (Figure 5D), which was consistent with the effects observed for the common substrate MyBP (Figure 3C). As the kelch-repeat domain has demonstrated potential for protein interactions41, we used a bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay to identify such interactions. GL3.1ΔP, which contains a kelch-repeat domain, interacted with Cyclin-T1;3 in the absence of the GL3.1 Ser/Thr phosphatase domain (Figure 5E). In addition, Cyclin-T1;3 was constitutively expressed in various tissues and organs in a pattern similar to that of GL3.1 (Supplementary information, Figure S8A–S8D). These results demonstrate that Cyclin-T1;3 interacts with GL3.1 and is dephosphorylated through GL3.1.
Real-time PCR was performed to analyze the expression of Cyclin-T1;3 after cell synchronization. In contrast to the high expression levels observed at 16 h and 32 h in FAZ1 cells, Cyclin-T1;3 showed increased expression at 8 h and 28 h in NIL cells (Figure 5F). At these two specific points, the cells were entering the S and G2 phases, respectively, which indicates that Cyclin-T1;3 may be involved in cell cycle control. Moreover, we used transgenic rice plants to determine whether Cyclin-T1;3 influences grain size. No obvious phenotype was observed when we overexpressed Cyclin-T1;3 in Zhonghua 11. However, antisense strands of Cyclin-T1;3 resulted in smaller grain sizes in the transgenic plants as well as reduced expression of CyclinT1;3 (Figure 5G–5I). Thus, our data indicate that Cyclin-T1;3 is involved in the GL3.1-mediated regulation of grain length.
GL3.1 is a widespread gene that influences protein phosphorylation in vivo
A quantitative proteomic analysis using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2-D DIGE) indicated that 21 proteins were differentially expressed in FAZ1 and NIL, of which 18 were upregulated in NIL (Supplementary information, Table S1). Mass spectrometry revealed that the 21 proteins were associated with cellular metabolic processes. Interestingly, actin was upregulated in NIL, which is consistent with the observation that GL3.1 influences the rate of cell proliferation. The phosphopeptides from the young spikelets of FAZ1 and NIL were enriched on the TiO2 beads and quantified using iTRAQ, which confirmed that GL3.1 is a phosphatase. 556 phosphopeptides were detected, and 464 of these molecules were quantified. Proteins showing a 1.5-fold difference between FAZ1 and NIL and demonstrating the same trend when quantified using two different labelling systems were chosen for further analysis. At least 130 proteins demonstrated a different phosphorylation status between FAZ1 and NIL during spikelet development (Figure 6A and Supplementary information, Table S2). Gene ontology analysis revealed that these proteins are primarily involved in processes related to nucleic acid metabolism and protein complex assembly (Figure 6B and Supplementary information, Table S3). The molecular functions of these proteins include nucleotide binding and the activities of phosphotransferases, helicases and the RNA polymerase II transcription factor. These results strongly suggest that GL3.1 could influence DNA duplication. Thus, we propose that GL3.1 regulates the expression and phosphorylation of a variety of genes involved in metabolism and cell division. Further phylogenetic analyzes based on genomic BLAST searches demonstrated the widespread existence of GL3.1 in plants (Supplementary information, Figure S9), which suggests that GL3.1 has an important conserved function in plants.
Discussion
In this study, we cloned GL3.1, which is a QTL that controls rice grain length. The natural GL3.1 allele increased grain length, weight and yield. Interestingly, we did not observe significant changes in the other traits in NIL, which potentially indicates that GL3.1 primarily regulates spikelet hull development. Therefore, GL3.1 may be a useful gene for breeding to achieve a higher yield. GL3.1 was identified as a novel type of Ser/Thr phosphatase that belongs to the PPKL subfamily. Little is known about the PPKL family, which is only distributed in the Viridiplantae. It is thought that a common progenitor captured an ancestral PP1-like enzyme containing a kelch-repeat domain via endosymbiosis42,43, and subsequently the PPKLs evolved independently in algae and plants. The enzymatic properties of PPKLs are closely related to those of PP1; however, high concentrations of either Inhibitor 2 or OA did not inhibit the phosphatase activity of GL3.1. Therefore, GL3.1 represents a novel type of PPKL phosphatase. In contrast, kelch-repeat proteins have been well characterized and are widely conserved from Caenorhabditis elegans to humans. Kelch-repeat motifs typically form conserved β-propeller tertiary structures and contain potential protein-protein interaction sites41. Kelch-repeat proteins regulate many cell processes through associations with the actin cytoskeleton44,45; regulate transcription, cell morphology and organization46; or exert extracellular functions47. We demonstrated that the fragment containing the kelch domain of GL3.1 interacts with Cyclin-T1;3 and observed that actin and other cell cycle genes were upregulated in NIL. In the present study, Cyclin-T1;3 was identified as a substrate of GL3.1 in the grain length regulation pathway. Thus, we propose that Cyclin-T1;3 influences the spikelet hull cell cycle during its development. It is generally accepted that Cyclin T1 controls the elongation phase of RNA polymerase II through the formation of a P-TEFb complex with CDK948; however, other studies have suggested that Cyclin T1 may affect cell proliferation12,49. We observed that the expression of Cyclin-T1;3 in FAZ1 was delayed for 4 h to 8 h compared with that in NIL. Cyclin-T1;3 may play an important role in cell division because its expression was associated with the percentage of cells with a 4C DNA content at 8 h after release. However, the similarity of the expression pattern to that of CYCD4;1 indicates that Cyclin-T1;3 may also be involved in G2-phase control. Furthermore, we observed that the phosphorylation of some proteins related to RNA polymerase II was different between FAZ1 and NIL during spikelet development, which implies that Cyclin-T1;3 involvement in the GL3.1-mediated pathway controls cell division.
GL3.1-WY3 differs from GL3.1-FAZ1 by two amino acid substitutions, induces a longer grain length as a result of an increased number of cells in the spikelet hull, and accelerates milk filling, which leads to increased grain weight and yield. GL3.1 influenced grain length through an increased rate of cell division during spikelet hull development, as evidenced by the upregulation of cell cycle-related genes and an increase in the proportion of cells with 4C DNA content; however, there was no effect on cell size. Protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation critically regulate the cell cycle50. The dephosphorylation activity of GL3.1-FAZ1 was higher than that of GL3.1-WY3, GL3.1-M1 and GL3.1-M2; therefore, we hypothesize that the ability of GL3.1 to dephosphorylate substrates, such as Cyclin-T1;3, may regulate cell proliferation during spikelet development. We propose that the high activity of GL3.1-FAZ1 dephosphorylates substrates, such as Cyclin-T1;3, to promote cell proliferation, which leads to normal cell proliferation during spikelet hull development (Figure 6C). For the WY3 allele, the weaker dephosphorylation activity of GL3.1-WY3 resulted in an accumulation of phosphorylated substrates that promoted cell proliferation during spikelet development and increased the grain length (Figure 6D). Only transgenic lines expressing high levels of GL3.1-WY3 had an increased grain size, which indicates that a significant increase in the expression of the low-activity GL3.1-WY3 allele would result in competition for substrates with the abundant endogenous GL3.1-FAZ1, which has increased dephosphorylation activity. As a result, higher quantities of phosphorylated substrates accumulate in GL3.1-WY3-overexpressing transgenic plants, which leads to accelerated cell division and eventually results in an elongated grain. Thus, we propose that Cyclin-T1;3 is one of the substrates in this pathway. In summary, we hypothesize that the larger grain size in lines overexpressing GL3.1-WY3, GL3.1-M1 and GL3.1-M2 that contain high levels of exogenous GL3.1 may result from dominant negative effects.
Efficient breeding requires a thorough understanding of the molecular and genetic factors that regulate seed development. Although considerable research has been performed to this end, an investigation of the relationship among cloned QTLs for grain size is needed. According to a previous study, GW2 and GW5 both function in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and control grain size through the regulation of cell division; thus, GW2 and GW5 may be involved in the same pathway for grain size control7,8,9. However, GL3.1 and GS3 encode different types of proteins10, and whether they function in the same pathway remains unknown. Determining the relationship between these QTLs would be useful for understanding grain development. However, GL3.1 is similar to BSU1, and whether GL3.1 plays a role in BR responses needs to be further investigated. In this study, we cloned a new QTL, GL3.1, characterized its function, and further identified the GL3.1-mediated pathway that regulates grain size and yield. This results obtained in this study contribute to the understanding of the molecular and genetic factors involved in seed development and provide a new approach for improving crop grain yield.
Materials and Methods
Plant materials
The large grain WY3 of the japonica variety and the small grain FAZ1 of the indica variety were chosen as parents for mapping the genes that control grain length. WY3 was crossed with FAZ1 to produce F1 plants, and subsequently, the F1 plants were backcrossed with FAZ1 as the recurrent parent to generate BC1F1. Repetitive backcrossing and marker-assisted selection produced some plants where the region surrounding GL3.1 was heterozygous, but nearly all other regions were homozygous for FAZ1. We used segregating populations for the fine- and high-resolution mapping of GL3.1. From the BC4F2 generations, we developed a nearly isogenic line (NIL) for GL3.1, which contained a 30-kb region from the WY3 chromosomal region including the GL3.1 locus in the FAZ1 genetic background. In total, 107 markers were used to screen the genetic background of NIL.
Fine-mapping of GL3.1
We used 179 BC2F2 plants for the fine-mapping of GL3.1 at chromosome 3. Subsequently, 5 542 BC3F2 plants were used to further fine-map GL3.1. The phenotypes of the grains in selected recombinants were further confirmed using BC3F3 progeny. To further determine the location of GL3.1, we developed markers based on the sequence of the PAC clone (AL731878). The molecular marker primers are listed in Supplementary information, Table S4. The candidate genes for GL3.1 from FAZ1 and WY3 were sequenced and compared.
Trait measurement
The grain length, width, thickness and 1 000-grain weight were measured when the plants were completely matured. For the trait measurements, we chose grains from the top part of the largest panicle. To determine grain length, width and thickness, 20 grains were measured. To determine the 1 000-grain weight, 100 grains were weighed, and the measurement was repeated three times. The entire spikelet hull, including the lemma and palea, were included in this measurement. The endosperm was dried at 90 °C overnight and the dry weight was measured. For the plot yield tests, all plants in the plots were collected and threshed (the plants at the border of plots were removed before harvest). After most of the impurities were removed, the grains were weighed, and the weight was recorded as W1. Subsequently, 5 kg of grain from each plot was dried at 42 °C for 1 week. When the water content (WC) was below 17% (measured using a seed moisture analyzer), the grains were weighed, and the weight was recorded as W2. The standard water content of the rice grains was 13.5%. The plot yields were determined from W3 = W1×W2×(1-WC)/5/(1-13.5%). We repeated the yield tests for FAZ1 and NIL twice. We did not replicate the tests for the yield of Huanghuazhan and Huanghuazhan (GL3.1) because we used a larger area (about 110 m2) to test the yield.
RNA extraction and real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated from different tissues of FAZ1, WY3 and NIL plants during different stages using the RNeasy Plant mini kit (Qiagen). The spikelet tissues included the palea and lemma. RNase-free DNase I treatment was performed to remove any genomic DNA contamination. First-strand cDNA was synthesized according to a published method39. Real-time PCR was performed on an ABI 7300 using the SYBR Green method. The cycling conditions were 30 s at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of amplification (95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 31 s). The ubiquitin gene was used as an endogenous control to normalize the detected gene expression. To determine the number of transgenic copies, we used DNA as a template and SPS as an endogenous control to examine the expression of Hyg. The data were analyzed according to the ΔΔCt method. Each analysis was repeated three times. The primers used for real-time PCR are listed in Supplementary information, Table S4.
Prokaryotic expression and purification
The full-length GL3.1 ORFs from FAZ1 and WY3 were amplified using specific primers (Supplementary information, Table S4), digested using EcoRI and SalI and cloned into pMAL-c4x (NEB). Mutated GL3.1-M1 and GL3.1-M2 were constructed as previously described20 and also cloned into pMAL-c4x. The constructs were transformed into the bacterial strain TB1 (NEB). The transformed cells were cultured at 37 °C overnight and transferred into fresh medium at a 1:50 dilution. After 2 h, and once the OD600 of the cell culture had reached 0.3, 1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG) was added into the medium to induce protein expression. The cells were cultured for 16 h at 20 °C and subsequently lysed using an ultrasonic crusher. After centrifugation at 16 000× g for 30 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was collected for protein purification. The fusion proteins were purified on amylose resin (NEB)51.
The ORF of Cyclin-T1;3 was amplified using specific primers, and the products were digested using SalI and NotI and cloned into pGEX4T. The construct was transformed into Rosetta (DE3) bacteria. The transformed cells were cultured at 37 °C overnight and transferred into fresh medium at a 1:50 dilution. Protein expression was induced after 2 h as described above. The cells were cultured for 5 h at 37 °C. The supernatant containing the fusion protein was collected as described above51 and purified using glutathione Sepharose (GE).
Yeast two-hybrid assay
GL3.1-FAZ1 was cloned into the vector PEG202 (Invitrogen) with bait, and a rice cDNA library from the young spikelet of Zhonghua 11 was constructed into PPC86 with prey. These two constructions were co-transformed with the reporter vector psh18-34 into the yeast strain EGY48. The yeast colonies were cultured on -Leu/-His/-Ura SD media, and after two days, the colonies were printed onto -Leu/-His/-Ura/-Trp SD media to screen for positive colonies. The genes encoding proteins that interact with GL3.1 were characterized through sequencing of the positive colonies. Cyclin-T1;3 was cloned into PPC86 and co-transformed with PEG202-GL3.1-FAZ1 and psh18-34 into the EGY48 to confirm the interaction. The overnight yeast cultures were diluted to an OD600 of 0.5, serially diluted and printed onto either -Leu/-His/-Ura SD or -Leu/-His/-Ura/-Trp SD media.
Subcellular localization, BiFC
The coding sequences of GL3.1 from FAZ1 and WY3 were fused with yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) or eYFP; Cyclin-T1;3 was fused with CFP or Cerulean; the SV40 nuclear localization signal was fused with mRFP; and all of these fusion proteins were transcribed from the 35S promoter. These plasmids were co-transformed or separately transformed into the protoplast of Arabidopsis using an established method52. The subcellular and co-localization of these proteins was evaluated using a confocal laser-scanning microscope (FluoView FV1000; Olympus).
For the BiFC tests, GL3.1ΔP was fused with the N-terminus of YFP and Cyclin-T1;3 was fused with the C-terminus of YFP. The resulting plasmids were transformed into Agrobacterium strain GV3101. After culturing for 36 h, the thallus of GL3.1Δ P-nYFP and Cyclin-T1;3-cYFP was co-injected into the young leaves of tobacco. Transformed tobacco plants were cultured for 72 h at 22 °C, and subsequently, the leaves were observed using confocal laser-scanning microscopy (LAM510; Carl Zeiss).
Vector construction and rice transformation
We used the Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) to generate the fragments of GL3.1-M1 and GL3.1-M2. The ORFs of GL3.1-FAZ1, GL3.1-WY3, GL3.1-M1 and GL3.1-M2 were cloned into pHB53, which contains two CaMV 35S promoters, for plant overexpression; the reversed GL3.1-FAZ1 ORF was cloned into pHB to generate GL3.1-antisense transgenic lines. For GL3.1-RNAi constructs, a GL3.1-FAZ1 250 bp fragment was also cloned into the plant RNAi vector Tck303. The ORFs of Cyclin-T1;3 were cloned into pHB for plant overexpression, and the reversed Cyclin-T1;3 ORF was cloned into pHB to generate Cyclin-T1;3 antisense transgenic lines. All constructs were confirmed through sequencing and transformed into the small grain japonica variety Zhonghua 11 using an Agrobacterium-mediated method7.
Synchronization cultures
The brown grains of FAZ1 and NIL were placed onto N6D2 medium to induce calluses. These calluses were separated into small balls (2 mm in diameter) and placed onto N6D2 medium containing 5 mM hydroxycarbamide or 0.3 μM nocodazole for 18 h. The calluses were washed three times with liquid N6D2 and again placed on N6D2 medium. Five calluses were collected for RNA isolation and flow cytometric analysis at each detection point.
Nucleus isolation and assessment of ploidy
After the spikelet hull length (when the length reached the 5 detection points mentioned earilier) was measured, the spikelet hulls at different developmental stages were soaked separately in the nuclear isolation mixture (Beckman). In total, 50 spikelet hulls were selected and chopped with a sharp blade. After filtering through a 40-μm nylon riddle, the suspension was loaded into the Mofol from Beckman (for flow cytometric analysis) to assess the ploidy of the nuclei. For each test, the ploidy of 10 000 to 20 000 nuclei was recorded. The numbers of isoploid and tetraploid nuclei were recorded, and subsequently, the percentage of cells with 4C DNA content was calculated from the number of cells with 4C DNA content divided by the total number of isoploids and cells with 4C DNA content. The proportions of G1, G2 and S phase cells were analyzed using FCS Express 4 (De novo Software).
Enzyme activity assessment
Prior to the enzyme activity tests, different forms of GL3.1, Cyclin-T1;3 and MyBP were phosphorylated using protein kinase A (NEB) at 30 °C overnight according to the manufacturer's instructions. Considering that the activity of many phosphatases is regulated through phosphorylation, GL3.1 was also phosphorylated using the same method. After phosphorylation, 50 ng GL3.1::MBP or MBP was incubated with 1 μg of Cyclin-T1;3 or MyBP at 30 °C for 30 min, and the enzyme activity was measured according to the manufacturer's instructions (Serine/Threonine Phosphatase Assay System, Promega). The inhibitors OA (NEB) and Inhibitor 2 (NEB) were added when necessary. The optical densities of the samples were recorded using Synergy 2 (BioTek).
DIGE and protein identification
Young spikelets from FAZ1 and NIL (panicle length less than 5 cm) were chosen as test materials for DIGE. We used methods previously described54, with slight modifications. The test materials were powdered in liquid nitrogen, and subsequently, the proteins were extracted using an ultrasonic crusher. After centrifugation at 12 000 r.p.m. for 45 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was collected and the protein components were quantified using the Bradford method. For DIGE, 50 ng of proteins were labelled with 400 pmol of dye; proteins from FAZ1 and NIL were labelled separately with Cy3 and Cy5. Total protein was labelled with Cy2 as an endogenous control. For each assay, 50 ng of protein was loaded onto each gel. The images were analyzed using DeCyder 2D 6.5 (GE Healthcare). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight/time of flight (MALDI-TOF/TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) was used for protein identification.
Isolation, identification and quantification of phosphoproteins
Proteins from young spikelets (panicle length less than 5 cm) of FAZ1 and NIL were isolated according to the method used for DIGE and digested in buffer (10 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM IAA, 2 U trypsin buffer) at 37 °C for 18 h. Then, the peptides were labelled according to the illustration of iTRAQ (ABI company); the peptides from FAZ1 were labelled with 114 and 116, whereas peptides from NIL were labelled with 115 and 11755. TiO2 beads were used to collect the phosphorylated peptides. After elution from the beads, the peptides were analyzed using nano-liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS, and the resulting data were analyzed at www.bioinfo.cau.edu.cn/agriGO.
References
Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B, et al. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292:281–284.
Hibberd JM, Sheehy JE, Langdale JA . Using C4 photosynthesis to increase the yield of rice-rationale and feasibility. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2008; 11:228–231.
Khush GS . Green revolution: preparing for the 21st century. Genome 1999; 42:646–655.
Khush GS . What it will take to feed 5.0 billion rice consumers in 2030. Plant Mol Biol 2005; 59:1–6.
Zhang Q . Strategies for developing Green Super Rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:16402–16409.
Kropff M, Cassman K, Peng S, Matthews R, Setter T . Quantitative understanding of yield potential. In: Cassman K, ed. Breaking the Yield Barrier. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, 1994:21–38.
Song XJ, Huang W, Shi M, Zhu MZ, Lin HX . A QTL for rice grain width and weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nat Genet 2007; 39:623–630.
Shomura A, Izawa T, Ebana K, et al. Deletion in a gene associated with grain size increased yields during rice domestication. Nat Genet 2008; 40:1023–1028.
Weng J, Gu S, Wan X, et al. Isolation and initial characterization of GW5, a major QTL associated with rice grain width and weight. Cell Res 2008; 18:1199–1209.
Mao H, Sun S, Yao J, et al. Linking differential domain functions of the GS3 protein to natural variation of grain size in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:19579–19584.
Fan C, Xing Y, Mao H, et al. GS3, a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein. Theor Appl Genet 2006; 112:1164–1171.
Li Y, Fan C, Xing Y, et al. Natural variation in GS5 plays an important role in regulating grain size and yield in rice. Nat Genet 2011; 43:1266–1269.
Wang E, Wang J, Zhu X, et al. Control of rice grain-filling and yield by a gene with a potential signature of domestication. Nat Genet 2008; 40:1370–1374.
Ashikari M, Sakakibara H, Lin S, et al. Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science 2005; 309:741–745.
Xue W, Xing Y, Weng X, et al. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet 2008; 40:761–767.
Huang X, Qian Q, Liu Z, et al. Natural variation at the DEP1 locus enhances grain yield in rice. Nat Genet 2009; 41:494–497.
Li X, Qian Q, Fu Z, et al. Control of tillering in rice. Nature 2003; 422:618–621.
Jiao Y, Wang Y, Xue D, et al. Regulation of OsSPL14 by OsmiR156 defines ideal plant architecture in rice. Nat Genet 2010; 42:541–544.
Miura K, Ikeda M, Matsubara A, et al. OsSPL14 promoters panicles branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nat Genet 2010; 42:545–549.
Jin J, Huang W, Gao JP, et al. Genetic control of rice plant architecture under domestication. Nat Genet 2008; 40:1365–1369.
Tan L, Li X, Liu F, et al. Control of a key transition from prostrate to erect growth in rice domestication. Nat Genet 2008; 40:1360–1364.
Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F, et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 2006; 127:635–648.
Cohen P . The regulation of protein function by multisite phosphorylation--a 25 year update. Trends Biochem Sci 2000; 25:596–601.
Farkas I, Dombradi V, Miskei M, Szabados L, Koncz C . Arabidopsis PPP family of serine/threonine phosphatases. Trends Plant Sci 2007; 12:169–176.
Denu JM, Stuckey JA, Saper MA, Dixon JE . Form and function in protein dephosphorylation. Cell 1996; 87:361–364.
Janssens V, Goris J . Protein phosphatase 2A: a highly regulated family of serine/threonine phosphatases implicated in cell growth and signalling. Biochem J 2001; 353:417–439.
Luan S . Protein phosphatases in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2003; 54:63–92.
Goldberg J, Huang HB, Kwon YG, Greengard P, Nairn AC, Kuriyan J . Three-dimensional structure of the catalytic subunit of protein serine/threonine phosphatase-1. Nature 1995; 376:745–753.
Barton GJ, Cohen PT, Barford D . Conservation analysis and structure prediction of the protein serine/threonine phosphatases. Sequence similarity with diadenosine tetraphosphatase from Escherichia coli suggests homology to the protein phosphatases. Eur J Biochem 1994; 220:225–237.
Kutuzov MA, Andreeva AV . Protein Ser/Thr phosphatases with kelch-like repeat domains. Cell Signal 2002; 14:745–750.
Li JL, Baker DA . A putative protein serine/threonine phosphatase from Plasmodium falciparum contains a large N-terminal extension and five unique inserts in the catalytic domain. Mol Biochem Parasitol 1998; 95:287–295.
Mora-Garcia S, Vert G, Yin Y, Cano-Delgado A, Cheong H, Chory J . Nuclear protein phosphatases with Kelch-repeat domains modulate the response to brassinosteroids in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 2004; 18:448–460.
Kerk D, Bulgrien J, Smith DW, Barsam B, Veretnik s, Gribskov M . The complement of protein phosphatase catalytic subunits encoded in the genome of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2002; 129:908–925.
Kim TW, Guan S, Sun Y, et al. Brassinosteroid signal transduction from cell-surface receptor kinases to nuclear transcription factors. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11:1254–1260.
Aluko G, Martinez C, Tohme J, et al. QTL mapping of grain quantity traits from the interspecific cross Oryza sativa × O. glaberrima. Theor Appl Genet 2004; 109:630–639.
Li JM, Michael T, Susan RM . Fine mapping of a grain-weight quantitative trait locus in the pericentromeric region of rice chromosome 3. Genetics 2004; 168:2187–2195.
Liu TM, Mao DH, Zhang SP, Xu CG, Xing YZ . Fine mapping SPP1, a QTL controlling the number of spikelets per panicle, to a BAC clone in rice (Oryza sativa). Theor Appl Genet 2009; 118:1509–1517.
Wang JK, Wan XY, Jose C, Jonathan C, Weng JF, Zhai HQ, Wan JM . QTL mapping of grain length in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using chromosome segment substitution lines. Genet Res 2006; 88:93–104.
Ren ZH, Gao JP, Li LG, et al. A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nat Genet 2005; 37:1141–1146.
Shigeto K, Hiroshi S, Teruo A, Minoru T, Takash S, Minako N . Analysis by in vitro mutagenesis of PP2Aα okadaic acid responsive sequences. Biochem and Biophys Res Commun 1995; 214:518–523.
Adams J, Kelso R, Cooley L . The kelch repeat superfamily of proteins: propellers of cell function. Trends Cell Biol 2000; 10:17–24.
Weber AP, Linka M, Bhattacharya D . Single, ancient origin of a plastid metabolite translocator family in Plantae from an endomembrane-derived ancestor. Eukaryot Cell 2006; 5:609–612.
Cavalier-Smith T . Principles of protein and lipid targeting in secondary symbiogenesis: euglenoid, dinoflagellate, and sporozoan plastid origins and the eukaryote family tree. J Eukaryot Microbiol 1999; 46:347–366.
Eichinger L, Bomblies L, Vandekerckhove J, Schleicher M, Gettemans J . A novel type of protein kinase phosphorylates actin in the actin-fragmin complex. EMBO J 1996; 15:5547–5556.
Kim IF, Mohammadi E, Huang RC . Isolation and characterization of IPP, a novel human gene encoding an actin-binding, kelch-like protein. Gene 1999; 228:73–83.
Philips J, Herskowitz I . Identification of Kel1p, a kelch domain-containing protein involved in cell fusion and morphology in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 1998; 143:375–389.
Duke-Cohan JS, Gu J, McLaughlin DF, et al. Attractin (DPPT-L), a member of the CUB family of cell adhesion and guidance proteins, is secreted by activated human T lymphocytes and modulates immune cell interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:11336–11341.
Herrmann CH, Mancini MA . The Cdk9 and cyclin T subunits of TAK/P-TEFb localize to splicing factor-rich nuclear speckle regions. J Cell Sci 2001; 114:1491–1503.
Moiola C, De Luca P, Gardner K, Vazquez E, De Siervi A . Cyclin T1 overexpression induces malignant transformation and tumor growth. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:3119–3126 ().
De Wulf P, Montani F, Visintin R . Protein phosphatases take the mitotic stage. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2009; 21:806–815.
Sun SY, Chao DY, Li XM, et al. OsHAL3 mediates a new pathway in the light-regulated growth of rice. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11:845–851.
Miao Y, Jiang L . Transient expression of fluorescent fusion proteins in protoplasts of suspension cultured cells. Nat Protoc 2007; 2:2348–2353.
Mao J, Zhang YC, Sang Y, Li QH, Yang HQ . A role for Arabidopsis cryptochromes and COP1 in the regulation of stomatal opening. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:12270–12275.
Shi S, Chen W, Sun W . Comparative proteomic analysis of the Arabidopsis cbl1 mutant in response to salt stress. Proteomics 2011; 11:4712–4725.
Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN, et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004; 12:1154–1169.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Mr Xiao-Yan Gao, Mr Xiao-Shu Gao and Mr Wei-fang Jiang for assistance with transmission electron microscopy, confocal laser scanning microscopy and flow cytometry, respectively. This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2012CB944800 and 2012AA10A302), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31130071 and 31121063), the Ministry of Agriculture of China (2009ZX08009-102B), the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX3-EW-N-01), the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (CUHK466011 and CUHK2/CRF/11G) and the CAS-Croucher Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
( Supplementary information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Cell Research website.)
Supplementary information
Supplementary information, Figure S1
FAZ1 and NIL agricultural traits and grain quality. (PDF 458 kb)
Supplementary information, Figure S2
Phenotypic characterization of Huanghuazhan and Huanghuazhan (GL3.1) grains. (PDF 258 kb)
Supplementary information, Figure S3
Sequence alignment of GL3.1 from FAZ1 and WY3 with other large grain rice varieties. (PDF 1085 kb)
Supplementary information, Figure S4
Analysis of transgenic lines overexpressing GL3.1-WY3, GL3.1-M1, GL3.1-M2. (PDF 430 kb)
Supplementary information, Figure S5
Sequence alignment of GL3.1's promoter from FAZ1 and WY3. (PDF 693 kb)
Supplementary information, Figure S6
The expression pattern of GL3.1 in FAZ1 and NIL. (PDF 307 kb)
Supplementary information, Figure S7
Sequence alignment of phopshatase domain of GL3.1 and PP2A. (PDF 309 kb)
Supplementary information, Figure S8
The expression pattern of Cyclin-T1;3 in FAZ1 and NIL. (PDF 217 kb)
Supplementary information, Figure S9
Genomic alignment of GL3.1 from a variety of species. (PDF 382 kb)
Table S1
Influence of GL3 on differential protein expression in young FAZ1 and NIL spikelets. (PDF 19 kb)
Table S2
Proteins with different phosphorylation status between FAZ1 and NIL. (PDF 36 kb)
Table S3
Gene Ontology analysis of phosphoproteins. (PDF 19 kb)
Table S4
The primers used for GL3 study. (PDF 21 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qi, P., Lin, YS., Song, XJ. et al. The novel quantitative trait locus GL3.1 controls rice grain size and yield by regulating Cyclin-T1;3. Cell Res 22, 1666–1680 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2012.151
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2012.151
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Natural variation of Grain size 3 allele differentially functions in regulating grain length in xian/indica and geng/japonica rice
Euphytica (2024)
-
Identification of qGL4.1 and qGL4.2, two closely linked QTL controlling grain length in rice
Molecular Breeding (2024)
-
Development of introgression lines and mapping of qGW2, a novel QTL that confers grain width, in rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Molecular Breeding (2024)
-
Identification of Increased Grain Length 1 (IGL1), a novel gene encoded by a major QTL for modulating grain length in rice
Theoretical and Applied Genetics (2024)
-
T-DNA insertion mutants of Arabidopsis DA1 orthologous genes displayed altered plant height and yield-related traits in rice (O. Sativa L.)
Genes & Genomics (2024)