INTRODUCTION

Verticillium wilt is a soil-borne fungal disease giving serious wilt phenotype for various plant species and resulting in severe loss of crop production 1, 2, 3. Most Verticillium diseases are mainly caused by either Verticillium dahliae or V. albo-atrum4. The Verticillium species can produce extracellular toxins that are the cause of most of the symptoms associated with Verticillium wilt disease. The molecular mechanisms involved in plant defense responses to Verticillium are poorly understood. Tomato Ve gene, encoding a cell surface-like receptor, is the only known Verticillium-resistance gene, specifically confering plant resistance to V. albo-atrum race 1 5. Arabidopsis has been used as a model host plant for the analysis of interaction between Verticillium and the host 6, 7. Cyclic AMP-mediated signal transduction pathway was found to play a critical role in fungal phytopathogen invasion and growth in the host plants as well as the morphological changes in the hosts (reviewed in 8, 9). However, whether or not the endogenous cAMP in plant cells is involved in plant defense responses remains unknown. During the past decade, the importance of endogenous cAMP function in signal transduction in higher plants including plant defense responses gains more recognition (reviewed in 10, 11, 12, 13). The enzymes involved in cAMP metabolism in higher plants (such as adenylyl cyclase for cAMP synthesis 14) and cAMP-dependent proteins (such as cAMP-dependent protein kinase A-like kinase (PKA) 15) as well as cAMP response element-binding proteins (CREBs) 16 were identified and analyzed. A transient increase in amount of cAMP in response to pathogenic elicitors has been demonstrated in French bean 17, carrot 18, Medicago sativa19 and Cupressus lusitanica 20. Interestingly, one of the first cloned plant disease-resistance gene, the RPS gene, contains leucine-rich repeats, which is also present in yeast adenyl cyclase 21. Recently, two Arabidopsis lesion-mimic mutants dnd1 and hlm1, which show increased disease resistance, were demonstrated as mutants with mutations in genes encoding cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (CNGCs) 22, 23, suggesting that disease resistance could be activated in plants by disruption of cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels. cAMP seems to be a critical signaling molecule in mediating plant defense responses to phytopathogens.

Salicylic acid is the best-characterized signaling molecule in plant defense response (reviewed in 24, 25, 26, 27). Transgenic plants expressing the bacterial NahG gene, which encodes an enzyme that catalyze SA hydrolysis, show reduced or depleted expression of PR genes, and loss of systemic acquired resistance 28. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) is a key enzyme in SA synthesis and is expressed in response to a variety of pathogens and pathogen-derived elicitors 29, 30. Treatment of plant seedlings with membrane-permeable cAMP analogue resulted in the stimulation of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity 21, suggesting that cAMP might induce an accumulation of SA in plants.

In this study, we report an improved disease resistance of Arabidopsis plant to V. dahliae toxins, induced by exogenous application of either cAMP or SA. The treatment of Arabidopsis plants with V. dahliae toxins resulted in increases of either endogenous cAMP or SA contents in plant seedlings. Application of exogenous membrane-permeable cAMP analogue induced rapid increases of SA level and PR1 transcription. In conclusion, endogenous cAMP functions upstream of SA signal in plant defense responses against pathogen Verticillium by regulating SA production and the activation of subsequent plant defense pathway.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plants growth conditions and pathogen inoculation

Arabidopsis seeds (ecotype Columbia) were grown in mixed sterilized soil in a growth chamber under a 12 h light/ 12 h dark cycle (100 μmol/m2/s) and temperatures of 22 ± 1ºC and 15 ± 4ºC for daylight and night respectively. The relative humidity was kept at approximately 70%. The strain V229 of V. dahliae, a nondefoliating and strong pathogenic fungal strain was used throughout this study. The fungi were first grown in the cottonseed medium for 3 weeks, and then the mycelia were collected and ground with sterile water. The conidia were resuspended and diluted to a concentration of 1×107 conidia/ml. Four-week-old Arabidopsis seedlings were root-inoculated with 10 ml conidial suspension per pot. Mock-inoculated plants were 10 ml sterile water added as the control.

Preparation of crude toxin

The fungi were first activated in the potato dextrose agar medium at 25ºC in dark for 5 d. The fungal mycelia were cultured in Czapek's hydroponic medium 31 in an orbital shaker set at 170 rpm and 25ºC for 15 d. The culture was centrifuged at 12,000 g for 20 min to remove the mycelium, and the supernatant was filtered through 2 layers of filter paper, and the filtrate was lyophilized and stored at -20ºC. The frozen-dried material, used as the crude toxins, was dissolved in distilled water. The protein content in the isolated crude toxins was determined by the method of Bradford 32 with bovine serum albumin as a standard.

Phenotypic assay of Arabidopsis seedlings in MS medium

Vernalized Arabidopsis seeds were sterilized and germinated on 1×MS medium containing 0.8% (w/v) agar and 3% (w/v) sucrose at 22ºC under continuous illumination at 60 μmol/m2/s. After cultured in MS medium for 4 d, the seedlings were transferred to MS medium without or with addition of the fungal toxins and other reagents (such as cAMP, SA, etc.) as indicated in the text and the figures. The stock solutions of these reagents were filtered with a microfilter (Ø=0.22 μm) before added to MS medium. The toxin solutions were filtered with a 0.45 μm microporous filtering film and added to the medium before the medium was solidified (when the temperature of medium was around 60ºC). The agar plates were vertically placed in a growth chamber with continuous light (100 μmol/m2/s) at 22ºC for 4 d before taking photos.

For the test of Arabidopsis hypersensitive to the fungal toxins, 4 fully expanded Arabidopsis leaves were acupunctured with a small plastic syringe and a drop of 2 μl toxins was injected to leaves per needle hole. Mock-induced leaves were injected with 2 μl sterilized water as the control. The treated plants were maintained in a growth chamber with a cycle of 12 h of light (approximately 100 μmol/m2/s) and 12 h of dark at 22 ± 1ºC and 70% relative humidity.

Determination of free SA contents

Arabidopsis seeds were placed on bottles containing 1/2 MS liquid medium and kept at 4ºC for 3 d, and then germinated in growth chambers at 22ºC with continuous shake (80 rpm) in the light (approximately 50 μmol/m2/s). Six-day-old seedlings were transferred to bottle containing 1/2×MS medium with or without addition of the fungal toxins, cAMP, DDA, and/or FK as indicated in the text or the figures, and kept under the same growth conditions. The seedlings were collected at different time points, and then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80ºC before SA extraction. SA in the treated seedlings was extracted as described previously 33. The ethanol extracts were spotted onto silica gel (20 cm×20 cm, GF254) and developed in the mixed solvent of toluene:dioxane:acetic acid (90:25:4, v/v/v) for purification of SA as described previously 34. The purified SA samples were dissolved in 200 μl methanol and 15 μl was used for HPLC analysis (Waters Corp., MA, USA) with a spectroflurescence detector (Waters 474, excitation wavelength = 310 nm, emission wavelength = 415 nm). The mobile phase solvent was a mixture of methanol and 0.025% (v/v) H3PO4 at a ratio of 55:45 (v/v). The SA contents were calculated by comparing the peak area of a known amount of SA in methanol. Recovery rate for SA was between 30% and 50%.

Determination of cyclic AMP content

Six-day-old hydroponically growing seedlings were transferred to the bottle containing 1/2×MS medium with or without addition of the toxins, and kept in a growth chamber at 22ºC with continuous shake (80 rpm) in the light (approximately 50 μmol/m2/s). The seedlings were collected at different time points and washed with distilled water 5 times, and then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at -80ºC until cAMP extraction. For cAMP extraction, the treated seedlings were grounded in liquid nitrogen and homogenized into 3 ml of 1 M HClO4, and followed by centrifugation at 12,000 g for 10 min to separate the protein crystals from the acid soluble cAMP. The supernatant was mixed with 1 M KOH solution and lyophilized, and the extract was stored at -20ºC. The cAMP contents in the extracted samples were assayed using the cAMP-EIA kit (RPN225; Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA). To increase the sensitivity of the assay, the samples were acetylated following protocols provided with the cAMP-EIA kit. The cAMP standard solutions were prepared ranging from 0.04 to 2.56 pmol/ml using the standard solutions of cAMP provided in the kit. The cAMP contents were calculated by comparing the standard curve and shown in pmol of cAMP per gram fresh weight.

RNA isolation and hybridization

Six-day-old plants were grown in 1/2 MS medium with or without addition of the toxins and/or cAMP (or 8-Br-cAMP) as indicated in the text or the figures. The plant samples were collected at different time points after the treatments and kept frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted using the Trizol Regent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Fifteen microgram of total RNA were separated by electrophoresis through 1.2% (w/v) formaldehyde-agarose gels and blotted onto a nylon membrane (Hybond-N+; Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA) by capillary transfer. Ethidium bromide was included in the sample-loading buffer at a concentration of 40 mg/l, which allowed photography under UV light after electrophoresis to confirm equal sample loading. The probes for the detection of PR1 transcripts were PCR-amplified with primers of PR1F (5′-ACG TCC AGT CTT CGG CAT CC-3′) and PR1R (5′-GAG CTT AAA AAC CCT TCC AG-3′). The gene-specific probes were labeled with 32P dCTP (NEN, Boston, MA, USA) using the Rediprime TM II labeling kit (RPN1633, Amersham-Phamacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, UK) according to manufacture's instructions.

Chemicals

All chemicals were obtained from Sigma (St Louis, Missouri, USA) unless otherwise indicated. Cyclic AMP, 8-Br-cAMP, SA and DDA were prepared in distilled water. Forskolin was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), which gives the final DMSO concentration in the Arabidopsis culture medium at 0.1% (w/v). All the stock solutions were kept at -20ºC before use.

RESULTS

Verticillium wilt symptoms in Arabidopsis plants treated with pathogen inoculation or toxins

It had been reported that Vercitillium fungi might infect Arabidopsis plants to give rise characteristic disease symptoms 6, 7. In this study, we first analyzed the susceptibility of Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia) to V. dahliae strain V229. As shown in Fig. 1A, the inoculated plants showed typical disease symptoms (wilt, chlorosis) after one week infection. Leaf tissues near the acupunctured spots began to be desiccated 1 d after the injection of the extracted fungal toxins (data not shown). Four days after injection the tissues near the needle holes of the leaves appeared to become necrosis (Fig.1B). The symptoms induced by either fungi inoculation or toxins injection are very similar to that observed on cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum) (data not shown). Furthermore, susceptibility of Arabidopsis to the isolated toxins was tested on seedlings growing on MS medium plates containing toxins. We observed dose-dependent symptoms within toxin concentrations of 10 μg/ml to 50 μg/ml (Fig. 1C). Root growth was completely inhibited in the presence of toxins at all tested concentrations, suggesting that Arabidopsis roots are highly sensitive to toxins. When the concentration was higher than 30 μg/ml, toxin-induced cotyledon chlorosis was observed after 4 days' growth in toxin-containing medium (Fig. 1C). Thus, Arabidopsis can be used as a model plant to study plant-microb interacting mechanism between V. dahliae and higher plants. A concentration of 40 μg/ml toxins was used as the standard “Toxin-Treatment” in all of the following experiments.

Figure 1
figure 1

Verticillium disease symptoms of Arabidopsis plants under various growth conditions. (A) Soil-grown Arabidopsis (ecotype Columbia). Photographs show mock-inoculated (control) and V. dahliae-inoculated (+V229) Arabidopsis. V. dahliae-inoculation induced significant wilt and chlorosis appeared one week after the inoculation. (B) Hypersensitive response of Arabidopsis leaves (ecotype Columbia) injected with V. dahliae toxins. The leaves were photographed 4 days after the injection (scale bar, 5mm). (C) Phenotype of Arabidopsis seedlings grown in the medium containing toxins at different concentrations as indicated. (D) Effects of exogenous SA (10 nM) and 8-Br-cAMP (10 μM) on the phenotype of Arabidopsis seedlings in the presence or absence of the toxins. Photographs were taken 4 days after the treatments. (E) Phenotype comparison between wild type (Col) and the NahG transgenic line in the presence or absence of the toxins and exogenous 8-Br-cAMP (10 μM). (F) Effects of 100 μM DDA (an inhibitor of adenylyl cyclase) and 10 μM forskolin (FK, an activator of adenylyl cyclase) on the disease symptoms of Arabidopsis seedlings in the presence or absence of the Verticillium toxins. The addition of 0.1% (w/v) DMSO alone (the photo of Petri dish labeled with DMSO) was taken as the control (because FK stock solution was made in DMSO and the final concentration of DMSO in the medium was 0.1% (w/v).

Both exogenous cAMP and salicylic acid significantly increase resistance of Arabidopsis seedlings to Verticillium toxins

It has been reported that exogenously supplied SA can rapidly enter cells and the uptake of SA preceded the establishment of induced plant resistance to pathogen infection 35. There were also studies suggesting that cyclic AMP might be involved in the hypersensitive response of higher plants to fungal elicitors 19, 20. In order to test if cAMP and/or SA are involved in interaction between V. dahliae and Arabidopsis plants, we examined the possible role of exogenous cAMP and SA on Arabidopsis resistance to the fungal toxins. Either 10 nM SA or 10 μM 8-Br-cAMP (a membrane-permeable form of cAMP) was added to Arabidopsis culture medium. As shown in Fig. 1D, leaf chlorosis induced by fungal toxins was significantly reduced after addition of either SA or 8-Br-cAMP. However, exogenous 8-Br-cAMP did not reduce toxin-induced phenotype in SA-deficient Arabidopsis NahG mutants (Fig. 1E), suggesting that endogenous cAMP may act as an upstream signaling molecule in SA-mediated pathogen defense pathway.

Verticillium toxins elevate endogenous cAMP in Arabidopsis seedlings

We further hypothesized that V. dahliae toxins may induce change in endogenous cAMP level in plants during early stage of toxin treatment. To test this hypothesis, endogenous cyclic AMP was measured in Arabidopsis seedlings using EIA methods as described in Materials and Methods. As shown in Fig. 2, the basal level of endogenous cAMP in Arabidopsis seedlings was averaged at 6 pmol/g FW under the control conditions. A very rapid and dramatic increase of endogenous cAMP concentration was observed after the toxin treatment, and the endogenous cAMP concentration reached to 9-10 folds higher than that of the control after 4 min toxin treatment (Fig. 2). Interestingly, the toxin-induced transient cAMP elevation occurs in an oscillating pattern (Fig. 2) although its biological importance is unknown yet. These results strongly suggest that endogenous cAMP in Arabidopsis plants is involved in plant defense signaling pathway.

Figure 2
figure 2

V. dahliae toxin-induced endogenous cAMP elevation in Arabidopsis seedlings. Cyclic AMP was extracted at different time points after challenged with the toxins and assayed by EIA methods. The experiments were repeated three times and each time point in one experiment had three replicates. The data were presented as mean ± SE (n=3).

Exogenous cAMP- and the toxin-induced SA accumulation in Arabidopsis plants

Salicylic acid (SA) is a known signaling molecule involved in plant defense responses to pathogens (reviewed in 24, 25, 27). We have shown above in Fig. 1D that exogenous SA significantly increased the disease resistance of Arabidopsis seedlings to Verticillium toxins. Furthermore, the amount of endogenous SA in Arabidopsis seedlings increased dramatically due to the presence of membrane-permeable 8-Br-cAMP or the fungal toxins in the culture medium (Fig. 3A). Free SA content in Arabidopsis seedlings began to increase 12 h after the exposure to 8-Br-cAMP, and reached the maximal level at 24 h, and then decreased afterwards (Fig. 3A). Similarly, the toxin treatment induced significant increase of free SA content, which occurs later at 20 h and reached the maximal level at 48 h and then decreased afterwards (Fig. 3A). As a control, membrane-impermeable exogenous cAMP did not have any effect on SA accumulation (Fig. 3A). When both the toxins and 8-Br-cAMP were present, the accumulation of free SA occurs first as a small peak at 12 h after the exposure, followed by a broad and more significant increase between 60 h and 100 h after the treatment. The maximum accumulations of free SA in Arabidopsis seedlings upon treatment of toxins or 8-Br-cAMP or both toxins and 8-Br-cAMP were very similar (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, modulation of endogenous cAMP by regulating adenylyl cyclase activity also induced changes in SA level in Arabidopsis seedling (Fig. 3B). Addition of forskolin (FK), an adenylyl cyclase activator to promote intracellular cAMP level, significantly induced endogenous SA in Arabidopsis seedlings after 12 h incubation, and endogenous SA content reached the highest level after 24 h incubation (Fig. 3B). The FK-induced SA increase was toxins-independent (Fig. 3B). There is addiditive effect on SA elevation when toxin and FK were used together (Fig. 3B). On the otherhand, 2′, 5′-dideoxyadenosine (DDA), an inhibitor of adenylyl cyclase, significantly reduced toxin-induced endogenous SA accumulation (Fig. 3B). Taken together, these results strongly suggest that endogenous cAMP is a functional regulator of SA production in vivo.

Figure 3
figure 3

Effects of the toxins or cAMP on SA production in Arabidopsis seedlings. (A) Time kinetics of exogenous cAMP- or the toxin-induced changes in endogenous free SA contents. The toxins and cAMP concentrations were 40 μg/ml and 10 μM, respectively. (B) Effects of AC (adenylyl cyclase) regulators DDA (100 μM) and FK (10 μM) on endogenous free SA contents. All experiments were repeated three times and each time point in one experiment had three replicates. The data were presented as mean ± SE (n=3).

Toxin- and exogenous cAMP-induced expression of PR1 gene

It is known that the expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes is regulated by SA-mediated signaling pathway (reviewed in 36). Thus, we analyzed PR1 gene expression in Arabidopsis plants treated with toxins and/or cAMP analogue. As shown in Fig. 4, PR1 expression was undetectable in the absence of the toxins and 8-Br-cAMP, while application of the toxins or 8-Br-cAMP or both significantly induced PR1 expression. However, membrane-impermeable cAMP had no effect on PR1 expression (Fig. 4), suggesting that cAMP does regulate pathogenesis-related genes, most likely via regulating SA level.

Figure 4
figure 4

Verticillium dahliae toxins (40 μg/ml) and exogenous cAMP (10 μM) induced increases of PR1 transcription in Arabidopsis plants. Ethidium bromide-stained ribosomal RNA bands (rRNA) in RNA gel blots were used as the loading control.

Based on above observations, we conclude that endogenous cAMP functions in plant defense pathway against pathogenic fungal infection as a positive regulator via regulation of endogenous SA production or accumulation and subsequently regulates downstream pathogenesis-related gene expression and plant defense responses.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we have shown in Arabidopsis plants that V. dahliae toxins can elevate endogenous cAMP and SA. Introducing of cAMP homologue and SA exogenously can lead to greater disease resistance of Arabidopsis plants to the pathogen infection or the toxin treatment. Endogenous SA increases significantly upon cAMP homologue treatment, thus cAMP is probably a signal upstream of SA in plant defense pathway. PR1 transcription responds rapidly to exogenously applied cAMP homologue, probably via cAMP-induced elevation of intracellular SA signal. The PR1 expression reached the maximal level at 24 h after both exogenous cAMP and toxins applied (Fig. 4), which is well correlated with cAMP- and toxin-induced SA elevation as shown in Fig. 3B. Based on these data, we propose a working model for cAMP-mediated signaling pathway for plant early defense responses to pathogenic attacks (Fig. 5). When fungus V. dahliae or toxins is present, adenylyl cyclase (AC) is somehow activated, leading to elevation of cytosolic cAMP signals. The linker(s) between pathogens and AC is however still unknown and a receptor and/or G-protein are probably involved. Cytosolic cAMP may regulate calcium-permeable ion channel, such as CNGCs (cyclic nucleotide-gated channels), to increase cytosolic Ca2+ concentration and subsequently regulate SA synthesis. Alternatively, cAMP may stimulate SA biosynthesis through activating PAL 19, a known key enzyme in SA synthesis, and accumulation of phytoalexin and cell wall phenolic substances. Upon an increase in cytosolic SA concentration, plant defense pathway is activated, such as phytoalexin induction and PR protein expression. Membrane-permeable cAMP analogue, but not membrane-impermeable analogue, is effective in inducing SA accumulation and disease resistance of Arabidopsis plants to the toxins. cAMP is an intracellular second messenger, thus most likely it will target to an intracellular molecule or the cytoplasmic domain of a plasma membrane-localized protein.

Figure 5
figure 5

Proposed working model for cAMP-mediated Arabidopsis defense mechanisms in responses to Verticillium dahliae infection or Verticillium dahliae toxin challenge. The components shown in boxes with dotted lines are hypothetical. [Ca2+]i, cytosolic Ca2+ concentration; CNGCs, cyclic nucleotide-gated channels; PRs, pathogenesis-related proteins; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; SA, salicylic acid.

Pathogen infection has to be first recognized by plant resistance system and then the interaction between the host and the pathogen will initiate signaling processes to generate second messengers and to trigger subsequent defense responses (reviewed in 24, 25). The early events including membrane potential changes, ion fluxes, and active oxygen species production occur rapidly in response to pathogen attacks (reviewed in 37). Later responses of plants to pathogen such as the production of phytoalexins and induction of defense gene expression followed. In the present study, we observed that endogenous cAMP was responding to toxin induction rapidly in an oscillated manner. The toxin-induced rapid change of endogenous cAMP suggests that cAMP may act as an important signaling molecule during the early stage of plant defense responses.

Intracellular concentrations of cAMP reported previously varied in higher plants, ranging from 0.5 pmol/g FW to 80 pmol/g FW (reviewed in 10). The difference may result from experimental methods used by different groups. We used cAMP enzymeimmunoassay (EIA) kit for the measurement of the endogenous cAMP concentrations in plant tissues and obtained repeatable results of about 6 pmol/g FW under the control conditions (Fig. 2). Our results have shown that cAMP in plant cells is usually kept at a very low concentration under normal growth condition and will be increased 10 to 15-fold in response to stimuli such as a pathogenic fungal attack. Further attention should be paid to the fluctuation changes in cytosolic cAMP we have observed after the toxin treatment (Fig. 2), although the mechanism behind is unknown.

It is known that plant cells possess cyclic nucleotide-gated channels to transport ions such as sodium, potassium or calcium 38. Environmental stimuli are potent inducers of cytosolic Ca2+ spikes ([Ca2+]i) with specific Ca2+ signatures of different amplitudes, kinetics and spatial distributions. The stimulus-induced changes in [Ca2+]i could be transient, sustained, or oscillatory. There are several studies about the involvement of cAMP or cGMP in elevation of [Ca2+]i 18, 39. It is reasonable to propose the existence of a tight correlation between cytosolic cAMP and Ca2+ in signal transduction of plant defense responses. Members of CNGC family of ion transporters may be good candidates for down-stream targets and effectors of cyclic nucleotide signals in plants 38, for example in plant pathogen response 22, 23.

In conclusion, the results presented in this work strongly suggest that the endogenous cAMP is involved in signal transduction of plant defense responses through regulation of SA production. Further understanding of cAMP-mediated plant defense signaling requires identification of upstream components in cAMP synthesis and downstream targets of elevated cytosolic cAMP.