ABSTRACT
Human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) has long been speculated as a beneficial factor for a successful pregnancy for its restricted expression on fetal-maternal extravillous cytotrophoblasts and its capability of modulating uterine natural killer cell (uNK) function such as cytotoxicity and cytokine production through NK cell receptors. HLA class I α1 domain is an important killer cell Ig-like receptor (KIR) recognition site and the Met76 and Gln79 are unique to HLA-G in this region. NK cell receptor KIR2DL4 is a specific receptor for HLA-G, yet the recognition site on HLA-G remains unknown. In this study, retroviral transduction was applied to express the wild type HLA-G (HLA-wtG), mutant HLA-G (HLA-mG) on the chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line K562 cells and KIR2DL4 molecule on NK-92 cells, respectively. KIR2DL4-IgG Fc fusion protein was generated to determine the binding specificity between KIR2DL4 and HLA-G. Our results showed that residue Met76 , Gln79 mutated to Ala76, 79 in the α1 domain of HLA-G protein could affect the binding affinity between KIR2DL4 and HLA-G, meanwhile, the KIR2DL4 transfected NK-92 cells (NK-92-2DL4) showed a considerably different cytolysis ability against the HLA-wtG and HLA-mG transfected K562 targets. Taken together, our data indicated that residue Met76 and Gln79 in HLA-G α1 domain plays a critical role in the recognition of KIR2DL4, which could be an explanation for the isoforms of HLA-G, all containing the α1 domain, with the potential to regulate NK functions.
Similar content being viewed by others
INTRODUCTION
The non-classical HLA class I antigen HLA-G is mainly expressed on extravillous cytotrophoblasts that invade deciduae in uterine pregnancy. Furthermore, HLA-G can modulate the function of most immune component cells such as NK cells, T cells and Dendritic cells, indicating that it may contribute to the maintaining of the maternal-fetal immunotolerance by protecting the allogenic fetus from maternal immune response and/or pathogen infections which threat a successful pregnancy 1, 2. The primary transcript of HLA-G is alternatively spliced to produce four membrane-bound (HLA-G1, -G2, -G3,-G4) and three soluble (HLA-G5, -G6, -G7) isoforms 3. It is worthy noted that HLA-G3, which only contains the α1 domain, has the ability to regulate NK functions through KIR2DL4, suggesting the α1 domain of HLA-G protein might be involved in KIR2DL4 recognition 4. KIR2DL4, a member of KIR family, featured with both inhibitory and activating functional structure, has been described as the specific receptor for HLA-G 5. However, the definite recognition sites between them yet to be elucidated.
Extensive progresses have been made in determining receptor-ligand binding specificity of KIRs. Generally, KIR3D recognize HLA-A and HLA-B, whereas KIR2D recognize HLA-C allelic products. Of particular interest is that KIR2DL1 and 2DS1 recognize the C2 epitope (Asn77, Lys80) in HLA-Cw2, 4, 5, 6, 17, 18, while KIR2DL2, 2DL3 and 2DS2 recognize the C1 epitope (Ser77, Asn80) in HLA-Cw1, 3, 7, 8, 13, 14 6. In addition, residues at position 77∼83 in α1 domain also get involved in the interaction between KIR3D and HLA-B. Therefore, it appears that MHC Class I specific KIRs share a common feature of binding to their corresponding ligands recognizing the residues 77∼83 in MHC Class I α1 domain 7. Given that Met76 and Gln79 are unique to HLA-G molecule in this region, we hypothesized that these two sites might play an important role in the specific binding of KIR2DL4 and HLA-G 8.
In this study, our results indicated that residues Met76 , Gln79 in the α1 domain of HLA-G protein could affect KIR2DL4 binding specificity, which was confirmed by cytotoxicity assay using NK-92-2DL4 cells against HLA-wtG (Met76, Gln79) and HLA-mG (Ala76, 79) transfected K562 cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell lines and antibodies
The erythroleukemia cell line K562 and HLA-wtG and HLA-mG K562 transfectants were maintained in complete RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 15% heat-inactivated FBS. Human leukemia cell line NK-92 (ATCC, MD) and its KIR2DL4 transfectants were cultured in Alpha Minimum Essential media (α-MEM) without ribonucleosides and deoxyribonucleosides (Gibco BRL, USA) and supplemented with 12.5% heat-inactivated FBS, 12.5% horse serum, 0.2 mM inositol, 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethnol, 0.02 mM folic acid, and 200 U/ml of rIL-2 (Bioscience, NY). COS-7, PA317 and NIH3T3 cell lines were maintained in DMEM medium. All cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.
The following mAbs are indicated: anti-KIR2DL4 mAb #33 (IgG1), anti-KIR2DL4 mAb #36 (IgM) were generously provided by E.O. Long (NIH, MD, USA); anti-pan-HLA I mAb W6/32 (IgG1) was kindly provided by D.E. Geraghty (Fred Huchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA).
KIR2DL4-Ig fusion protein expression and binding assay
KIR2DL4-Ig fusion protein was produced as previously described 9. The extracellular region of KIR2DL4 gene was amplified from a cDNA from decidual tissue with the forward primer 5'-CAGAGTGTGCTAGCGCACGTGGGTGGTCAGGACAAGCC3' containing an NheI site, and the reverse primer 5'-GAGTACCTAGGATCCGCATGCAGGTGTCTGGCGATACC-3' containing a BamHI site 5. The amplified sequence was inserted into the fusion protein expression vector Cd5lneg1 (provided by B. Seed from Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA and E.O. Long from NADID, NIH, MD). The reconstructed vector was transfected into the COS-7 cell using DEAE-Dextran according to the manufacturer's instruction. After transient expression, the transfectant cell culture supernatant was harvested, purified with Protein A Sepharose CL 4B (Pharmacia, USA) and concentrated with Centriprep-30 concentrators (Millpore, USA). Reducing condition SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis were performed to identify the fusion protein. Direct binding assay was performed using mAb#33 and FITC-conjugated goat anti-human Fc by flow cytometry as described in previous studies 9.
Full length KIR2DL4 and HLA-G cDNA constructs
Total RNA extracted from decidua was used as a RT-PCR template to generate full-length KIR2DL4 with following primers: forward primer containing a HindIII site (underlined), 5'-TCAAGCTTAGAAGCTGCACCATGTCCATGT-3', reverse primer containing a ClaI site, 5'-CCCGATCGATTGGAGACTCACGCCTTCAGA-3', PCR product was digested with HindIII and ClaI, subcolned into the vector pBlurescripts and sequenced, then the confirmed target sequence was ligated into the retrovirus expression vector pLNCX to generate recombinant retrovirus for generation of NK-92 cell line with stably integrated cDNA. To produce wild type HLA-G, primers were used as the following : sense (HindIII) 5'-TCAAGCTTGGTCCTGGTTCTAAAGTCCT-3', antisense (ClaI) 5'-CCG ATCGATTGAGACAGAGAGACGGAGACAT-3'. To mutate the Met76, Gln79 residues in the HLA-Gα1 domain, the wild type HLA-G cDNA was used as PCR template. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed with the following sets of mutageneic primers to produce the HLA-mG (Met76, Gln79 -Ala76, 79). Sense 5'-GACTGACAGAGCGAACCTGGCGACCCTGCGCG-3', antisense 5'-CGCGCAGGGTCGCCAGGTTCGCTCTGTCAGTT-3'. The HindIII and ClaI digested fragment of HLA-G and HLA-mG were cloned into the retrovirus expression vector pLNCX respectively to produce the recombined vector. The nucleotide sequence of HLA-G and HLA-mG insert was sequenced to confirm that only the expected mutations were present (GenBank accession No. AY359817, AY359818).
Retroviral transfection into K562 or NK-92 cell lines
The packaging cell line PA317 was transfected with the recombined pLNCX vector containing HLA-wtG, HLA-mG and full-length KIR2DL4 cDNA respectively using Lipofectamine Plus reagent (Life Technologies). Two-day culture supernatant in serum-free DMEM (Gibco Life Technologies) medium was incubated with NK-92 or K562 cells for 8 h in the presence of Lipofectamine Plus reagent, and then the transfected NK-92 cells were maintained in the complete α-MEM (Gibco Life Technologies) containing rIL-2. The transfected K562 cells were cultured in the RPMI 1640 (Gibco Life Technologies) for 3 d before screened with G418. Cell surface protein expression on the transfectants was detected by flow cytometry. Stable expression of exogenous HLA-wtG, HLA-mG on K562 cells, as well as KIR2DL4 on NK-92 cells, was measured by flow cytometry. Uniform HLA-wtG, HLA-mG expression in K562 transfectants, and KIR2DL4 expression in tranfected NK-92 cells were confirmed by Western blot at the same time using mAb W6/32 and mAb#33 respectively.
Cytotoxicity assay
Cytotoxicity experiment was performed using CytoTox 96 Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay Kit (Promega, USA). NK-92-2DL4 effector cells were maintained in complete α-MEM medium containing rIL-2 on the day before assay. During cytolysis assay, effector cells were mixed with 1×104 target cells at a E:T ratio of 10:1 in V-bottom 96-well plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA) as the manufacture's recommendation. Spontaneous release and maximal release of LDH in target cells and effector cells were measured by keeping these cells in medium alone. Each assay was performed in quadruplicate. Percentage of specific lysis was determined as follows:
(Experimental Release-Effector Spontaneous Release-Target Spontaneous Release) / (Target Maximum Release -Target Spontaneous Release)×100.
Antibody blocking assay
During cytotoxicity assay, anti-KIR2DL4 mAb#64 (IgM) was added to block the KIR2DL4 expression on the NK-92 transfectants. Effector cells were pre-incubated at room temperature in culture medium containing 200U/ml rIL-2 for 20 min and then incubated for 15 min at room temperature with mAb#64 (mouse anti-human IgM) before the target cells were added. An isotype matched IgM ntibody was used in the experiment as a negative control.
Flow cytometry and immunofluoresence microscopy analysis
For cell surface staining, standard method was performed. Briefly, the parent NK-92, K562 cells and their transfectants were harvested, washed with cold 1% BSA-PBS three times, then resuspended to a concentration of 2×106 cells/ml. Then 50 μl of cell suspension was added into the 96-well round-bottom culture plate. Cells were incubated with primary mAb W6/32 or mAb#33 respectively at 4°C for 1h, washed with cold 1% BSA-PBS and incubated with the FITC-labeled goat-anti-mouse IgG at 4 °C for 30 min. Isotype-matched antibody was used as the negative control. Finally, the cells were washed twice in cold PBS and fixed with 1% (w/v) paraformaldehyde/PBS solution, and analyzed with flow cytometry or subjected to fluorescent microscopy.
RESULTS
HLA-wtG and HLA-mG expression on K562 cells
As previous mentioned, the primary transcript of HLA-G can be alternatively spliced to give rise to four membrane-bound proteins (HLA-G1 to HLA-G4) and three soluble isoforms (HLA-G5 to HLA-G7). All of these isoforms contain the α1 domain that can be recognized by KIR2DL4. In vivo experiments indicated that the interaction between HLA-G and NK cell receptors could affect cytotoxicity activity of both the decidual and peripheral blood NK cells, as well as allogenic proliferative responses induced by antigen specific CTL or CD4+ T cells. Residues 77∼80 in the α1 domain of HLA class I molecule has been considered as an important KIR recognition site. In this region, Met76 and Gln79 are unique to HLA-G, suggesting these two residues might be involved in KIR2DL4 recognition.
To examine the potential role of these two residues to KIR2DL4 recognition, we generated a mutant HLA-G (Met76, Gln79-Ala76, 79, HLA-mG) which allowed us to directly compare the binding ability of HLA-wtG or HLA-mG to KIR2DL4-IgFc fusion protein. HLA-wtG and HLA-mG expression on K562 cells was measured by flow cytometry. We found that HLA-wtG and HLA-mG on cell surface were expressed at similar levels in retrovirus-transfected K562 cells (Fig. 1). The expression of HLA-wtG and HLA-mG was further confirmed by immunofluorescent staining (Fig. 2).
Direct binding of soluble KIR2DL4-Ig fusion proteins to K562 cell and its transfectants
To test whether Met76, Gln79 in HLA-G α1 domain get involved in KIR2DL4 recognition, soluble receptors were produced in the form of KIR2DL4-IgG Fc fusion protein. A band of expected molecular weigh (70 kD for KIR2DL4-IgGFc) was detected, then the protein was assessed by Coomassie blue and confirmed by Western blot with the mAb#33 (Fig. 3). Direct binding results showed that KIR2DL4-IgG Fc fusion protein bound strongly to K562-wtG cells, while a much weaker binding was detected in the K562-mG cells (Fig. 4, P < 0.01), suggesting residues Met76 or Gln79 or both in HLA-G α1 domain 1 could be the recognition site(s) responsible for HLA-G's interaction with KIR2DL4. Titrations of the fusion protein between 20 μg/ml and 40 μg/ml revealed a dose-dependent manner when binding to K562 transfectants.
Establishment of NK-92 cells expressing functional KIR2DL4
KIR2DL4 (CD158d) displays unusual characters among KIR family members for carrying both a single ITIM in its cytoplasmic tail and a charged Arg residue in its transmembrane region, suggesting a possible function of activating and inhibitory of KIR2DL4 11. Long et al confirmed both the inhibitory and activating functions of KIR2DL4 in terms of the different stages of NK cells 12.
NK-92 cell line is an IL-2-dependent NK-like cell line. NK-92 severs as an excellent model system to study NK cell biology and KIR functions for its strong target cell cytotoxicity and well-defined cell surface markers 13. We choose NK-92 cell line in this experiment, because it has been used successfully for retrovirus mediated expression, despite its low endogenous KIR2DL4 expression and lacking of FcγR III (CD16) expression, which benefits applying intact Abs instead of F(ab')2 to manipulate surface receptors 14.
The expression of KIR2DL4 on NK-92 transfectants was measured with mAb#33 (IgG) at a recommended concentration using flow cytometry. NK-92 cells express a low level of endogenous KIR2DL4 (4.2%) as revealed by flow cytomerty. While on the transfected NK-92 cells, expression of KIR2DL4 is relatively high, with the mean percentage of 87.52%. These results demonstrated that the recombined construct was successfully set up and KIR2DL4 was expressed stably on NK-92 cells (Fig. 5). Immunofluorescence analysis revealed that KIR2DL4 was densely epressed on the KIR2DL4 transfected NK-92 cell surface (Fig. 6).
HLA-G induced NK-92 cytolytic activity though KIR2DL4
Previous studies report that KIR2DL4 is an activating receptor leading to IFN-γ production in resting NK cells. Increasd IFN-γ and cytotoxicity in activated NK cells suggested that NK cell stage might be one of critical factors affecting the signal transducted by KIR2DL4 11. To determine what kind of signal would be transducted by KIR2DL4 and whether it was modulated by HLA-mG with respect to NK-92-2DL4 cells in current experiments, cytotoxicity assay was performed applying NK-92-2DL4 as the effector cells against the K562, K562-wtG and K562-mG targets. We observed that lysis of K562-wtG target cells by NK-92- 2DL4 cells were significantly increased compared to that of the K562-vac cells. Surprisingly, cytolysis of HLA-mG transfectants was considerable lower when comparing with that of NK-92-2DL4 against K562 cells, and the lysis of NK-92-2DL4 to K562-mG was similar to that of the K562-vac. The cytotoxicity of NK-92-2DL4 also displayed a phase-dependent manner that compared to the 8 h co-culture killing system. Increased specific lysis could be observed in 12 h co-culture of the effectors with target cells. It should be noted that blocking of KIR2DL4 expression on NK-92 cells with mAb#64 (IgM) could dramatically decrease the lytic ability of KIR2DL4-NK-92 against K562-wtG target cells (from 98.237% to 56.124%; P < 0.01), while no significant changes were observed with the lysis of NK-92-2DL4 against the K562-mG or K562-vac targets (Fig. 7; P > 0.05). Taken together, these results showed that KIR2DL4 is an activating receptor by interacting with HLA-G to induce the cytotoxicity of NK-92 cells, strongly supporting that the Met76, Gln79-Ala76, 79 mutation could modulate the recognition of KIR2DL4 to HLA-G protein.
DISCUSSION
Reproduction, a successful allotransplantation, is an important biological phenomenon posing an immunological paradox because the semiallogeneic fetus survives by evading the maternal immune recognition 15. The detailed mechanisms behind this maternal-fetal immunotolerance remain to be elusive. HLA-G has long been speculated as a major factor in maintaining the fetal-maternal immunotolerance for its restricted expression on extravillous cytotrophoblasts and potential ability in the regulation of uterine NK cell functions such as cytotoxicity and cytokine production by interacting with various NK cell receptors during pregnancy 16. The special functions of HLA-G are contributed to its structures. HLA-G is highly homologus to classical HLA class I molecules, in spite of which it exhibits specific structural characteristics with a shortened cytoplasmic tail which stabilizes its expression on cell surface 17. Furthermore, alternative splicing of its mRNA gives rise to seven isoforms including four membrane bound (HLA-G1, -G2, -G3, -G4) and three soluble (HLA-G5, -G6, -G7) proteins containing α1 domain. The third, the promoter region of HLA-G significantly differs from that of other HLA Class I genes, with most of the conserved regulatory boxes being deleted, altered or absent, including the interferon (IFN) regulatory sequence 1.
Extensive experiments have been done at both structural and functional levels on the full length of HLA-G1 since its discovery, demonstrating that receipts of HLA-G1 targets such as LCL721.221and K562 could resist NK cell cytolysis 18, 19, 20. However, biological functions of other isoforms have been poorly defined till recently. Riteau et al 4 pointed out that HLA-G2, -G3 and -G4 truncated isoforms were expressed as non-mature cell-surface glycoproteins and all of them could inhibit both innate (NK cells) and acquired (CTL) effectors through KIR2DL4, suggesting the α1 domain of HLA-G that contains the functional region, since both α2 and α3 domains are not presented in HLA-G3.
Residues from 77∼83 in classical HLA class I α1 domain have been proposed as crucial sites for KIR recognition. In this region, Met76 or Gln79 are unique to HLA-G among all alleles discovered to date. Therefore, these two sites were speculated to be crucial for KIR2DL4 recognition and this hypothesis was confirmed by our results.
Our data showed that KIR2DL4-IgG Fc fusion protein bound strongly to HLA-wtG, while much weakerly to the K562-mG cells. Cytotoxicity assay showed that KIR2DL4 could induce high cytotoxicity against K562-wtG cells as compared to the K562 and K562-mG cells. Treatment with anti-KIR2DL4 mAb#64 could dramatically block the lysis of NK-92-2DL4 against K562-wtG cells, while no obvious effects was found to the lysis of K562 and K562-mG with mAb#64 treatment. A discrepancy between previous reports and our results is that whether HLA-G was an immunotolerant molecule which could inhibit the cytolysis of NK cells to various HLA-G expressing targets. In these studies, polyclonal NK cells from peripheral blood were used, which express various NK cell receptors. Whatever interacting with known or unknown receptors, HLA-G renders its bearing targets resist the NK cells lyses 21, 22, 23. Meanwhile, different stages of NK cells and NK cells from different individuals may also contribute to the complicated result interpretation 12. Kikuchi-Maki A et al 24 recently provided strong evidences that the KIR2DL4 containing ITIM does not influence its activating function, which is an additional support to our results. Interestingly, genotype of KIR2DL4 may also influence its function in the view of what was reported by Goodridge et al 26, which described that KIR2DL4 is an activating receptor for NK cells from the individuals with at least one 10A allele. Cytotoxicity results in the present study further strengthen that residues Met76 or Gln79 or both in HLA-G α1 domain could be the recognition site(s) involved in the interaction with KIR2DL4. However, so far we could not exclude the possibility that the weak binding affinity was due to the altering or disrupting of other potential residues specific for KIR2DL4 recognition, for the mutation might change possible binding moiety conformation between HLA-G and KIR2DL4. The present study didn't examine whether the single residue Met76 or Gln79 mutation contribute to the change of the binding affinity, but this is clearly of interest to further understand the roles of these two residues in the interaction between KIR2DL4 and HLA-G molecules. To address this question, site-directed mutagenesis of the single amino acid residue of the Met76 and Gln79 is under investigation.
These findings provide insights into the KIR2DL4 recognition of HLA-G protein, and could offer an explanation to such questions as why homozygous HLA-G*0105N individuals didn't show any immunodeficiency, infections or tumors and no record of pregnancy and delivery pathology 27, 28. Cytosine in exon 3 of HLA-G*0105N, a null HLA-G allele, is deleted to result in a frameshift mutation leading to a stop codon at the beginning of exon 4. Therefore, homozygous HLA-G*0105N individuals can't generate HLA-G1 protein. However, homozygous HLA-G*0105N individual could produce at least HLA-G2, -G3, -G6, and -G7 isoforms 3. This was supported by Ober et al 25 that soluble HLA-G isoforms could be detected in placenta of homozygous HLA-G*0105N individual and Fuzzi et al 28 indicated that sHLA-G in early embryos is a fundamental prerequisite for the development of successful pregnancy.
In conclusion, our results not only demonstrate that KIR2DL4 can directly bind to HLA-G, but more importantly, residues Met76 and Gln79 in HLA-G α1 domain play a crucial role in KIR2DL4 and HLA-G interaction. Ponte et al 29 have reported expression of KIR2DL4 only on decidual-associated NK cells, thus raise the possibility that the signaling through KIR2DL4 might be of particular relevance to the maternal-fetal immunotolerance due to the high abundance of uNK cells in the deciduas in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy and their association with trophoblast cells 30.
Abbreviations
- HLA-wtG:
-
wild type HLA-G
- HLA-mG:
-
mutant HLA-G
- HLA:
-
Human Leukocyte Antigen
- KIR:
-
killer cell Ig-like receptor
- IFN-γ:
-
interferon-γ
References
Le Bouteiller P, Solier C . Is antigen presentation the primary function of HLA-G? Microbes Infect 2001; 3:323–32.
Proll J, Bensussan A, Goffin F, et al. Tubal versus uterine placentation: similar HLA-G expression extravillous cytotrophoblast invasion but different maternal leukocyte recruitment. Tissue Antigens 2000; 56:479–91.
Moreau P, Dausset J, Carosella ED, Rouas-Freiss N . Viewpoint on the functionality of the human leukocyte antigen-G null allele at the fetal-maternal interface. Biol Reprod 2002; 67:1375–8.
Riteau B, Rouas-Freiss N, Menier C, et al. HLA-G2, -G3, and -G4 isoforms expressed as nonmature cell surface glycoproteins inhibit NK and antigen-specific CTL cytolysis. J Immunol 2001; 166:5018–26.
Rajagopalan S, Long EO . A human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G-specific receptor expressed on all natural killer cells. J Exp Med 1999; 189:1093–100.
Middleton D, Curran M, Maxwell L . Natural killer cells and their receptors. Transpl Immunol 2002; 10:147–64.
Natarajan K, Dimasi N, Wang J, Mariuzza RA, Margulies DH . Structure and function of natural killer cell receptors: multiple molecular solutions to self, nonself discrimination. Annu Rev Immunol 2002; 20:853–85.
Van Der Ven K, Skrablin S, Engels G, Krebs D . HLA-G polymorphisms and alleles frequencies in Caucasians. Hum Immunol 1998; 59:302–12.
Winter CC, Long EO . Binding of soluble KIR-Fc fusion proteins to HLA class I. Methods Mol Biol 2000; 121:239–50.
Aruffo A, Stamenkovic I, Melnick M, Underhill CB, Seed B . CD44 is the principle cell surface receptor for hyaluronate. Cell 1990; 61:1303–13.
Faure M, Long EO . KIR2DL4 (CD158d), an NK cell-activating receptor with inhibitory potential. J Immunol 2002; 168:6208–14.
Rajagopalan S, Fu J, Long EO . Cutting edge: induction of IFN-γ production but not cytotoxicity by the killer cell Ig-like receptor KIR2DL4 (CD158d) in resting cells. J Immunol 2001; 167:1877–81.
Maki G, Klingemann HG, Martinson JA, Tam YK . Factors regulating the cytotoxic activity of the human natural killer cell line, NK-92. J Hematother Stem Cell Res 2001; 10:369–83.
Yusa S, Catina TL, Campbell KS . SHP-1- and phosphotyrosine-independent inhibitory signaling by a killer cell Ig-like receptor cytoplasmic domain in human NK cells. J Immunol 2002; 168:5047–57.
Thellin O, Coumans B, Zorzi W, Lgout A, Heinen E . Tolerance to the foeto-placental 'graft': ten ways to support a child for nine months. Curr Opin Immunol 2000; 12:731–7.
King A, Hiby SE, Gardner L, et al. Recognition of trophoblast HLA class I molecules by decidual NK cell receptors- a review. Placenta 2000; 21(Suppl A):s81–5.
Park B, Lee S, Kim E, et al. The truncated cytoplasmic tail of HLA-G serves a quality-control function in post-ER compartments. Immunity 2001; 15:213–24.
Marchal-Bras-Goncalves R, Rouas-Freiss N, Connan F, et al. A soluble HLA-G protein that inhibits natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Transplant Proc 2001; 33:2355–9.
Barakonyi A, Kovacs KT, Miko E, et al. Recognition of nonclassical HLA class I antigens by gamma delta T cells during pregnancy. J Immunol 2002; 168:2683–8.
Menier C, Riteau B, Carosella ED, Rouas-Freiss N . MICA triggering signal for NK cell tumor lysis is counteracted by HLA-G1-mediated inhibitory signal. Int J Cancer 2002; 100:63–70.
Le Gal FA, Riteau B, Sedlik C, et al. HLA-G mediated-inhibition of antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Int Immunol 1999; 11:1351–6.
Riteau B, Menier C, Khalil-daher I, et al. HLA-G inhibits the allogeneic proliferative response. J Reprod Immunol 1999; 43:203–11.
Rouas-Freiss N, Marchal-Bras-Goncalves R, Menier C, Dausset J, Carosella ED . Direct evidence to support the role of HLA-G in protecting the fetus from maternal uterine natural killer cytolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94:11520–5.
Kikuchi-Maki A, Yusa S, Catina TL, Campbell KS . KIR2DL4 is an IL-2-regulated NK cell receptor that exhibits limited expression in humans but triggers strong IFN-γ production. J Immunol 2003; 171:3415–25.
Ober C, Aldrich C, Rosinsky B, et al. HLA-G1 protein expression is not essential for fetal survival. Placenta 1998; 19:127–32.
Goddridge JP, Witt CS, Christiansen FT, Warren HS . KIR2DL4 (CD158d) genotype influences expression and function in NK cells. J Immunol 2003; 171:1768–74.
Casro MJ, Morales P, Rojo-Amigo R, et al. Homozygous HLA-G*0105N healthy individuals indicate that menbrane-anchored HLA-G1 molecules is not necessary for survival. Tissue Antigens 2000; 56:232–9.
Fuzzi B, Rizzo R, Criscuoli L, et al. HLA-G expression in early embryos is a fundamental prerequisite for the obtainment of pregnancy. Eur J Immunol 2002; 32:311–5.
Ponte M, Cantoni C, Biassoni R, et al. Inhibitory receptors sensing HLA-G1 molecules in pregnancy: decidual-associated natural killer cells express LIR-1 and CD94/NKG2A and acquire p49, an HLA-G1-specific receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:5674–9.
Loke YW, Hiby S, King A . Human leukocyte antigen-G and reproduction. J Reprod Immunol 1999; 43:235–42.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30371350) and Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai Municipality (No. 02DJ14054). We are grateful to Drs Long EO, Geraghty D for generously providing us the antibodies and plasmids. We would also like to thank Dr Seed B for providing plasmids and component cells.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
This article is cited by
-
Activation of immune signals during organ transplantation
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2023)
-
HLA-G peptide preferences change in transformed cells: impact on the binding motif
Immunogenetics (2018)
-
Killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor genes and ligands and their role in hematologic malignancies
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy (2016)
-
Expression of HLA-G in hemangioma and its clinical significance
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] (2012)
-
Biology of HLA-G in cancer: a candidate molecule for therapeutic intervention?
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2011)