Nature Outlook |

Science and technology education

A strong background in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) is crucial not only for students who go on to become scientists. The jobs of the future, in a variety of sectors, will increasingly require skills in STEM subjects. This Outlook looks at the ways in which science education is being modernized and updated to help prepare young people for life in the twenty-first century.

This Nature Outlook is editorially independent. It is produced with third party financial support. About this content.

Features and comment

More from Nature Research

  • Nature Reviews Chemistry | In the Classroom

    Experienced chemists know that chemistry is all around them. Helping students to see the connections between real life and concepts of organic chemistry is the driving force behind the development of a set of online resources pioneered at UCLA.

    • Tejas K. Shah
    •  &  Neil K. Garg
  • npj Science of Learning | Article | open

    Girls and boys show no cognitive differences in mathematical ability during infancy and early childhood across multiple tasks. To compare boys’ and girls’ early mathematical thinking, Alyssa Kersey and colleagues at the University of Rochester and University of Pittsburgh examined performance on three milestones of numerical development: numerosity sensitivity, counting range, and early mathematics achievement. Researchers tested not only for statistical differences between boys and girls but also statistical similarities. Across all aspects of early mathematics development, boys and girls exhibited no statistical differences and instead generally showed statistical equivalence. The results suggest that girls and boys begin development with an equivalent cognitive capacity for mathematics.

    • Alyssa J. Kersey
    • , Emily J. Braham
    • , Kelsey D. Csumitta
    • , Melissa E. Libertus
    •  &  Jessica F. Cantlon
  • Nature News | Comment

    It is time to use evidence-based teaching practices at all levels by providing incentives and effective evaluations, urge Stephen E. Bradforth, Emily R. Miller and colleagues.

    • Stephen E. Bradforth
    • , Emily R. Miller
    • , William R. Dichtel
    • , Adam K. Leibovich
    • , Andrew L. Feig
    • , James D. Martin
    • , Karen S. Bjorkman
    • , Zachary D. Schultz
    •  &  Tobin L. Smith