Point/Counterpoint

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2008) 83, 3, 391–393.doi:10.1038/sj.clpt.6100500

Why the United States Still Needs Improved Dietary Supplement Regulation and Oversight

JD Morrow1

1Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

Correspondence: JD Morrow, jason.morrow@vanderbilt.edu

Note from Guest Editor: One of the most difficult issues facing the Food and Drug Administration is how best to regulate natural health products and herbal medicines. In this Point/Counterpoint, two experts with different points of view were asked to address the same four questions regarding the regulation of these widely used products.

Top

Abstract

It has been 3 years since the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (ASCPT) issued a position statement regarding dietary supplement safety and regulation.1 I was the Chair of the ASCPT task force charged with issuing the statement. At the time, after careful review of available data, the other members and I concluded that dietary supplement legislation in the United States was lacking and that enhanced oversight was essential to increase the safety of these products for the American consumer.

Extra navigation

.

naturejobs

natureproducts


ADVERTISEMENT