Article
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2007) 81, 50–58. doi:10.1038/sj.clpt.6100025
Mechanism-based PK/PD Modeling of the Respiratory Depressant Effect of Buprenorphine and Fentanyl in Healthy Volunteers
A Yassen1, E Olofsen2, R Romberg2, E Sarton2, L Teppema2, M Danhof1 and A Dahan2
- 1Department of Pharmacology, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands
- 2Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Correspondence: M Danhof, (m.danhof@chem.leidenuniv.nl)
Received 18 May 2006; Accepted 4 October 2006.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship of buprenorphine and fentanyl for the respiratory depressant effect in healthy volunteers. Data on the time course of the ventilatory response at a fixed PETCO2 of 50 mm Hg and PETO2 of 110 mm Hg following intravenous administration of buprenorphine and fentanyl were obtained from two phase I studies (50 volunteers received buprenorphine: 0.05–0.6 mg/70 kg and 24 volunteers received fentanyl: 0.075–0.5 mg/70 kg). The PK/PD correlations were analyzed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. A two- and three-compartment pharmacokinetic model characterized the time course of fentanyl and buprenorphine concentration, respectively. Three structurally different PK/PD models were evaluated for their appropriateness to describe the time course of respiratory depression: (1) a biophase distribution model with a fractional sigmoid Emax pharmacodynamic model, (2) a receptor association/dissociation model with a linear transduction function, and (3) a combined biophase distribution-receptor association/dissociation model with a linear transduction function. The results show that for fentanyl hysteresis is entirely determined by the biophase distribution kinetics, whereas for buprenorphine hysteresis is caused by a combination of biophase distribution kinetics and receptor association/dissociation kinetics. The half-time values of biophase equilibration
were 16.4 and 75.3 min for fentanyl and buprenorphine, respectively. In addition, for buprenorphine, the value of kon was 0.246 ml/ng/min and the value of koff was 0.0102 min-1. The concentration–effect relationship of buprenorphine was characterized by a ceiling effect at higher concentrations (intrinsic activity
=0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50–0.62), whereas fentanyl displayed full respiratory depressant effect (
=0.91, 95% CI: 0.19–1.62).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Enhanced Buprenorphine Analgesia with the Addition of Ultra-low-dose Naloxone in Healthy SubjectsClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Article Response
Enhanced Buprenorphine Analgesia with the Addition of Ultra-low-dose Naloxone in Healthy SubjectsClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Article Response
Enhanced Buprenorphine Analgesia with the Addition of Ultra-low-dose Naloxone in Healthy SubjectsClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Article Response
Epidural Opioid Analgesia and Neonatal Respiratory DepressionJournal of Perinatology Correspondence
Mechanism-based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Meta-analysis of Trabectedin (ET-743, Yondelis) Induced NeutropeniaClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Article Response
See all 11 matches for Research