American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2005) 77, P89–P89; doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.12.233

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of efaproxiral in cancer patients receiving radiation therapy

M. R. Gastonguay PhD1, J. Venitz MD, PhD1, R. Steffen PhD1 and J. Hackman1

1Metrum Research Group LLC, Virginia Commonwealth University, Allos Therapeutics Inc, Avon, CT

Top

Abstract

Aims: Efaproxiral (EFP), a synthetic allosteric modifier of hemoglobin (Hb), reduces O2-binding affinity in blood (p50) and is investigated as a radiation therapy sensitizer. The goal of this work was to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of EFP in cancer (CA) patients.

Methods: Pooled data from 6 phase I -III trials included: 451 patients, 2582 plasma and 2881 RBC concentrations, and 2483 p50 values. Covariates were age, weight, height, sex, concomitant medications, CA type, Hb, albumin, creatinine clearance, body surface area (BSA) and dose. Data were analyzed using NONMEM.

Results: A linear, 2-compartment model with RBC:plasma proportionality constant and a linear RBC-p50 model described the PK-PD relationship. Parameters were consistent with previously reported values (%SE): CL=1.88 L/hr (8%), V1=10.5 L (2%), Q=2.58 L/hr (12%), V2=18.1 L (10%), SLPRBC=0.982 (1%), INTp50=26.9 mmHg (approx0%), SLPp50=0.0193 mmHg/(mug/mL) (5%). The inclusion of covariates resulted in improvements in goodness of fit and decreases in the estimated inter-individual variances. The final model adequately described the central tendency and population variability for the observed data.

Conclusions: Differences in PK-PD response due to CA type were small, may have been study-related and were probably not clinically relevant. EFP exposure increased with age, but the clinical relevance of this effect was unknown. BSA was the most important predictor of EFP disposition.

Extra navigation

.

naturejobs

ADVERTISEMENT