Clinical Trials
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (1999) 66, 636–641; doi: 10.1053/cp.1999.v66.103171001
The effect of tramadol in painful polyneuropathy in relation to serum drug and metabolite levels*
Søren H. Sindrup MD1, Claus Madsen MD1, Kim Brøsen MD1 and Troels S. Jensen MD1
1Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark and the Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Correspondence: Søren H. Sindrup, MD, Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark.
*Supported by a grant from Grünenthal GmbH, Stolberg, Germany. Grünenthal also provided study medication.
Received 7 June 1999; Accepted 22 September 1999.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Tramadol is a racemic drug that may act through a monoaminergic effect of (+)- and (-)-tramadol and through an opioid effect of its metabolite (+)-M1. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between relief of pain and serum concentrations of tramadol and M1 in tramadol treatment of painful polyneuropathy.
Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 200 to 400 mg/day tramadol, serum concentrations of (+)- and (-)-tramadol and (+)- and (-)-M1 were determined in 28 of 34 patients. On-going and touch-evoked pain was rated daily by the patients by use of 0- to 10-point numeric rating scales during two 4-week treatment periods.
Results: Tramadol significantly reduced both on-going (P = .002) and touch-evoked pain (P < .001). There was no relation between relief of on-going and touch-evoked pain and serum concentrations of (+)-tramadol, (-)-tramadol, (+)-M1, or (-)-M1 (P = .11 to P = .89). Seventeen of the patients were categorized as responders for on-going pain and 16 for touch-evoked pain. Responders for on-going pain tended to have higher serum concentrations of (+)-M1 than nonresponders (median, 27 nmol/L versus 16 nmol/L; P = .08). Isobolograms showed that the fraction of nonresponders was higher among patients with low concentrations of both tramadol and (+)-M1 both for on-going (P = .009) and touch-evoked (P = .02) pain.
Conclusion: The opioid effect of (+)-M1 may be of importance for tramadol relief of on-going neuropathic pain but, in general, relief of neuropathic pain seems to depend on both the monoaminergic effect of (+)- and (-)-tramadol and the opioid effect of (+)-M1.
