Pharmacokinetics and Drug Disposition
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (1997) 61, 312–318; doi:
Bromfenac disposition in patients with impaired kidney function*
James C. Ermer MS1, Joseph P. Boni PhD1, William H. Cevallos PhD1, Sheryl DeCleene RN1, Peter Burghart MS1, Michael R. Rudnick MD1, Richard J. Fruncillo MD, PhD1, Jeffrey S. Berns MD1 and Raphael M. Cohen MD1
1Department of Pharmacokinetics, the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, the Clinical Pharmacology Unit, and the Department of Drug Metabolism, Wyeth-Ayerst Research, and the Division of Nephrology of Graduate Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa and Wyeth-Ayerst Research, Princeton, N.J.
Correspondence: Joseph P. Boni, PhD, 145 King of Prussia Road, Radnor, PA 19087.
*Supported by Wyeth-Ayerst Research, Philadelphia, Pa.
Presented at the 1993 Meeting of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, November 14–18, Orlando, Fla.
Received 1 April 1996; Accepted 27 August 1996.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the pharmacokinetics of bromfenac among normal subjects and renally compromised patients and patients with end-stage renal disease.
Methods: Bromfenac pharmacokinetics were examined after a single 50 mg oral dose in 18 subjects with normal kidney function, 12 subjects with decreased kidney function, and 10 dialysis-dependent subjects. Protein binding was assessed by equilibrium dialysis.
Results: Mean peak concentrations and areas under the concentration versus time curve ranged from 3.3 to 3.9
g/ml and 5.1 to 6.9
g
hr/ml, respectively. The mean unbound fraction in the subjects receiving dialysis (0.29%) was nearly twice that in the subjects with normal kidney function (0.17%) and in the subjects with impaired kidney function (0.16%), but no differences were detected in clearance, volume of distribution, or their free fraction-corrected counterparts. Bromfenac half-life nearly doubled in the impaired and dialysis groups but was shorter than the anticipated 8-hour dose interval. Eight subjects had a total of 11 study events; none were serious and all were self-limited.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that no dosage adjustment is necessary in patients with impaired kidney function, but clinical monitoring appropriate for their individual condition is recommended.
