Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Enhanced specificity of HPV16 E6E7 siRNA by RNA–DNA chimera modification

Abstract

Although efforts have been made to develop new drugs for infectious and neoplastic diseases utilizing synthetic small interfering RNA(siRNAs), those intrinsically have undesirable effects, including silencing of unintended genes (off-target effect) and nonspecific cytotoxicity. Off-target effects can be avoided by DNA substitution in the guide strand (GS) seed region of nucleotide positions 1–8 and its complementary part of the passenger strand plus the 3′ overhang, which is designated as a double-strand RNA–DNA chimera (dsRDC). In this study, we found that the specificity of potent siRNAs targeting human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) E6 and E7 oncogenes, which we previously reported, could be enhanced by short dsRDC modification (first six nucleotides from the 5′ end of the GS and its complementary nucleotides of the passenger strand). Such dsRDC modification reduced nonspecific cytotoxicity in two of three siRNAs (497 and 752), although not in the other (573), which correlated with their off-target effects. In addition, silencing activity was marginally impaired in two dsRDCs (497 and 573) and moderately in one (752). Finally, dsRDC-497 induced E6E7-specific growth suppression of cervical cancer cells as well as E6E7-immortalized human keratinocytes. Our results show that dsRDC modification enhances the specificity of E6E7 siRNA, which is required for use in in vivo settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ

References

  1. Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A, Weber K, Tuschl T . Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature 2001; 411: 494–498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Caplen NJ, Parrish S, Imani F, Fire A, Morgan RA . Specific inhibition of gene expression by small double-stranded RNAs in invertebrate and vertebrate systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 9742–9747.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson AL, Bartz SR, Schelter J, Kobayashi SV, Burchard J, Mao M et al. Expression profiling reveals off-target gene regulation by RNAi. Nat Biotechnol 2003; 21: 635–637.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Saxena S, Jonsson ZO, Dutta A . Small RNAs with imperfect match to endogenous mRNA repress translation. Implications for off-target activity of small inhibitory RNA in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 44312–44319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin X, Ruan X, Anderson MG, McDowell JA, Kroeger PE, Fesik SW et al. siRNA-mediated off-target gene silencing triggered by a 7 nt complementation. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33: 4527–4535.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Birmingham A, Anderson EM, Reynolds A, Ilsley-Tyree D, Leake D, Fedorov Y et al. 3′ UTR seed matches, but not overall identity, are associated with RNAi off-targets. Nat Methods 2006; 3: 199–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jackson AL, Burchard J, Leake D, Reynolds A, Schelter J, Guo J et al. Position-specific chemical modification of siRNAs reduces ‘off-target’ transcript silencing. RNA 2006; 12: 1197–1205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ui-Tei K, Naito Y, Zenno S, Nishi K, Yamato K, Takahashi F et al. Functional dissection of siRNA sequence by systematic DNA substitution: modified siRNA with a DNA seed arm is a powerful tool for mammalian gene silencing with significantly reduced off-target effect. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36: 2136–2151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bramsen JB, Laursen MB, Nielsen AF, Hansen TB, Bus C, Langkjaer N et al. A large-scale chemical modification screen identifies design rules to generate siRNAs with high activity, high stability and low toxicity. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37: 2867–2881.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Castanotto D, Sakurai K, Lingeman R, Li H, Shively L, Aagaard L et al. Combinatorial delivery of small interfering RNAs reduces RNAi efficacy by selective incorporation into RISC. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35: 5154–5164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grimm D, Streetz KL, Jopling CL, Storm TA, Pandey K, Davis CR et al. Fatality in mice due to oversaturation of cellular microRNA/short hairpin RNA pathways. Nature 2006; 441: 537–541.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan AA, Betel D, Miller ML, Sander C, Leslie CS, Marks DS . Transfection of small RNAs globally perturbs gene regulation by endogenous microRNAs. Nat Biotechnol 2009; 27: 549–555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bosch FX, de Sanjose S . Chapter 1: Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer—burden and assessment of causality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2003; 31: 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. zur Hausen H . Papillomaviruses causing cancer: evasion from host-cell control in early events in carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 690–698.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Longworth MS, Laimins LA . Pathogenesis of human papillomaviruses in differentiating epithelia. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2004; 68: 362–372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Munger K, Baldwin A, Edwards KM, Hayakawa H, Nguyen CL, Owens M et al. Mechanisms of human papillomavirus-induced oncogenesis. J Virol 2004; 78: 11451–11460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yugawa T, Kiyono T . Molecular mechanisms of cervical carcinogenesis by high-risk human papillomaviruses: novel functions of E6 and E7 oncoproteins. Rev Med Virol 2009; 19: 97–113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen Z, Kamath P, Zhang S, St John L, Adler-Storthz K, Shillitoe EJ . Effects on tumor cells of ribozymes that cleave the RNA transcripts of human papillomavirus type 18. Cancer Gene Ther 1996; 3: 18–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Venturini F, Braspenning J, Homann M, Gissmann L, Sczakiel G . Kinetic selection of HPV 16 E6/E7-directed antisense nucleic acids: anti-proliferative effects on HPV 16-transformed cells. Nucleic Acids Res 1999; 27: 1585–1592.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. DeFilippis RA, Goodwin EC, Wu L, DiMaio D . Endogenous human papillomavirus E6 and E7 proteins differentially regulate proliferation, senescence, and apoptosis in HeLa cervical carcinoma cells. J Virol 2003; 77: 1551–1563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang M, Milner J . Selective silencing of viral gene expression in HPV-positive human cervical carcinoma cells treated with siRNA, a primer of RNA interference. Oncogene 2002; 21: 6041–6048.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoshinouchi M, Yamada T, Kizaki M, Fen J, Koseki T, Ikeda Y et al. In vitro and in vivo growth suppression of human papillomavirus 16-positive cervical cancer cells by E6 siRNA. Mol Ther 2003; 8: 762–768.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Butz K, Ristriani T, Hengstermann A, Denk C, Scheffner M, Hoppe-Seyler F . siRNA targeting of the viral E6 oncogene efficiently kills human papillomavirus-positive cancer cells. Oncogene 2003; 22: 5938–5945.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall AH, Alexander KA . RNA interference of human papillomavirus type 18 E6 and E7 induces senescence in HeLa cells. J Virol 2003; 77: 6066–6069.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bosch FX, Castellsague X, de Sanjose S . HPV and cervical cancer: screening or vaccination? Br J Cancer 2008; 98: 15–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Putral LN, Bywater MJ, Gu W, Saunders NA, Gabrielli BG, Leggatt GR et al. RNA interference against human papillomavirus oncogenes in cervical cancer cells results in increased sensitivity to cisplatin. Mol Pharmacol 2005; 68: 1311–1319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamato K, Yamada T, Kizaki M, Ui-Tei K, Natori Y, Fujino M et al. New highly potent and specific E6 and E7 siRNAs for treatment of HPV16 positive cervical cancer. Cancer Gene Ther 2008; 15: 140–153.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Haga K, Ohno S, Yugawa T, Narisawa-Saito M, Fujita M, Sakamoto M et al. Efficient immortalization of primary human cells by p16INK4a-specific short hairpin RNA or Bmi-1, combined with introduction of hTERT. Cancer Sci 2007; 98: 147–154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Naito Y, Yamada T, Ui-Tei K, Morishita S, Saigo K . siDirect: highly effective, target-specific siRNA design software for mammalian RNA interference. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: W124–W129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lanham S, Herbert A, Watt P . HPV detection and measurement of HPV-16, telomerase, and survivin transcripts in colposcopy clinic patients. J Clin Pathol 2001; 54: 304–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Narisawa-Saito M, Yoshimatsu Y, Ohno S, Yugawa T, Egawa N, Fujita M et al. An in vitro multistep carcinogenesis model for human cervical cancer. Cancer Res 2008; 68: 5699–5705.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hutvagner G, Zamore PD . A microRNA in a multiple-turnover RNAi enzyme complex. Science 2002; 297: 2056–2060.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Doench JG, Petersen CP, Sharp PA . siRNAs can function as miRNAs. Genes Dev 2003; 17: 438–442.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chiu YL, Rana TM . RNAi in human cells: basic structural and functional features of small interfering RNA. Mol Cell 2002; 10: 549–561.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ui-Tei K, Naito Y, Nishi K, Juni A, Saigo K . Thermodynamic stability and Watson–Crick base pairing in the seed duplex are major determinants of the efficiency of the siRNA-based off-target effect. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36: 7100–7109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ui-Tei K, Nishi K, Naito Y, Zenno S, Juni A, Saigo K . Reduced base–base interactions between the DNA seed and RNA target are the major determinants of a significant reduction in the off-target effect due to DNA-seed-containing siRNA. Proceedings of the 2009 Micro-Nano Mechatronics and Human Science; 2009, pp 298–304.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Yukikazu Natori (Tokyo Institute of Technology) for the helpful discussion and suggestions. This work was supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KY) and a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare of Japan (KY).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K Yamato.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on Cancer Gene Therapy website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamato, K., Egawa, N., Endo, S. et al. Enhanced specificity of HPV16 E6E7 siRNA by RNA–DNA chimera modification. Cancer Gene Ther 18, 587–597 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/cgt.2011.28

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cgt.2011.28

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links