Original Article

Cancer Gene Therapy (2007) 14, 627–639; doi:10.1038/sj.cgt.7701055; published online 4 May 2007

Comparison of herpes simplex virus- and conditionally replicative adenovirus-based vectors for glioblastoma treatment

D Hoffmann1 and O Wildner1

1Institute of Microbiology and Hygiene, Department of Molecular and Medical Virology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, NRW, Germany

Correspondence: Dr O Wildner, Institute of Microbiology and Hygiene, Department of Molecular and Medical Virology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bldg. MA, Rm. 6/40, D-44801 Bochum, NRW, Germany. E-mail: Oliver.Wildner@ruhr-uni-bochum.de

Received 30 November 2006; Revised 7 February 2007; Accepted 11 March 2007; Published online 4 May 2007.

Top

Abstract

In this study we compared side-by-side the anti-neoplastic activity of the oncolytic herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) vector G47Delta with that of a conditionally replicative adenoviral vector for the treatment of glioblastoma. We analyzed the transduction efficiency of permanent glioblastoma cell lines and short-term cultures of glioblastoma cells with HSV.Luc and four adenovirus type 5 (Ad5)-based vectors that differed only in their fiber gene (Ad5.Luc, AdlucRGD, and the fiber chimeric vectors Ad5/3.Luc and Ad5/35.Luc). In the tested short-term cultures of glioblastoma cells the vectors Ad5/35.Luc and HSV.Luc had an equal transduction efficiency which was approx70% higher than that of Ad5.Luc. In a subcutaneous xenograft glioblastoma model in nude mice we observed a significantly higher local tumor control with the G47Delta vector compared to the conditionally replicative Ad5/35 adenovirus. We confirmed in glioblastoma that the intratumoral expression of measles virus fusogenic membrane glycoproteins (FMG) encoded by replication-defective Ad5/35 or HSV-1 amplicon vectors synergistically enhances chemotherapy with temozolomide. The anti-neoplastic effect was superior when the replication-defective FMG encoding vectors were trans-complemented for replication with the respective oncolytic vector. This approach was necessary due to packaging constraints of adenovirus. At day 100, of 6 treated animals 1 was alive that received the Ad5/35- and 3 that received the HSV-1-based triple therapy. In an intracranial glioblastoma xenograft model we demonstrated the applicability of this strategy. Due to the higher oncolytic efficacy and packaging capacity of the HSV-1 vectors compared to adenovirus, these vectors are promising for the treatment of glioblastoma.

Keywords:

glioblastoma multiforme, conditionally replicative fiber chimeric Ad5/35 adenoviral vector, engineered oncolytic herpes simplex type 1, measles virus fusogenic membrane proteins, chemotherapy

Extra navigation

.

naturejobs

ADVERTISEMENT