milestone 18
Mad and Bub check it out
During the cell cycle, a cell goes through a series of sequential events
one step has to be completed before the next is initiated. This linear
progression can be achieved in at least two ways: each step could require a
product of the preceding step for its initiation, or there might be regulatory
feedback mechanisms which ensure that a subsequent step in the cell cycle is
not initiated if a crucial event, known as a checkpoint, has not been completed
successfully. In 1991, two studies published in Cell, one led by
Andrew Hoyt, the
other by Andrew Murray, identified the spindle checkpoint by showing the
existence of a feedback-control mechanism that prevents cells from leaving
mitosis if their mitotic spindle has been incompletely assembled. Using
independent approaches, the two groups isolated mutants that exit mitosis and
proceed to the next phase of the cell cycle, despite defects in their spindle
formation.
 |  |
The existence of a checkpoint mechanism that involves
Rad9
(see
Milestone 14) and controls the
state of genomic DNA had already been shown. Could a similar mechanism operate
during mitosis? Components of a feedback mechanism can be isolated if
conditions are found under which cells overcome cell-cycle arrest. The two
groups carried out genetic screens designed to address the possibility that
exit from mitosis depends on microtubule function. Mutagenized Saccharomyces
cerevisiae cells that were grown in the presence of benomyl, an inhibitor
of microtubule polymerization, were screened for mutants that failed to arrest
in mitosis.
The five mutants isolated by Li et al. mapped to three loci and
were named 'mitotic arrest-deficient', or mad. By careful analysis of
nuclear morphology and the DNA content, the authors showed that mad
cells die at the end of nuclear division, presumably when they attempt to
segregate their chromosomes in the absence of a functional spindle. Benomyl
slows down microtubule assembly, and the mad mutant phenotype can be
rescued if DNA synthesis is slowed down experimentally. It increases the time
between the onset of spindle formation and the end of mitosis so, for
mad mutants grown on benomyl, it simply means more time for spindle
assembly.
By 1991, it was known that entry to mitosis is regulated by a protein
kinase the so-called 'maturation-promoting factor' (MPF; see
Milestone 7). Activation of MPF
induces entry into mitosis and assembly of the mitotic spindle; conversely, its
inactivation induces interphase, chromosome segregation and cell division. By
looking at activated MPF in mad cells as they proceed through the cell
cycle, Li et al. showed that, whereas in normal cells grown on benomyl
cell-cycle arrest coincides with high levels of MPF, mad cells fail to
stabilize their MPF levels under the same conditions. It is the drop in MPF
activity that pushes mad cells towards exit from mitosis, despite their
spindle defect.
As might be expected, some mad cells show extensive chromosome
loss, even without benomyl, which indicates that their wild-type products are
needed for accurate chromosome segregation. Cloning of
Mad2
showed a largely novel protein that contained calcium-binding motifs.
Hoyt and colleagues chose to study three mutants that were recovered
from their screens; named bub, for 'budding uninhibited by
benzimidazole' a benomyl-related compound. Despite unsuccessful
completion of mitosis, bub mutants proceed to the next cell cycle and
initiate DNA replication, duplicate their spindle pole and bud. Hoyt et
al. confirmed the microtubule-specific phenotype of bub mutants by
crossing them to an α-tubulin mutant, thereby replacing the chemical
microtubule-disruption method with a genetic one. But the authors also showed
that disrupting microtubule structure alone was not enough to kill bub
mutants progression through the cell cycle was absolutely required for
their death. Similar to mad mutants, bub mutants also affect the
cell cycle by regulating MPF activity.
Identification of mad and bub mutants indicated, for the
first time, the existence of a mitotic-spindle checkpoint that was linked to
the regulation of MPF activity crucial for the decision of whether to
arrest or progress through the cell cycle. At the time it was not clear how Mad
and Bub regulated MPF levels, and another player involved in the spindle
checkpoint
Mps1
was yet to be discovered. The mad and bub mutants also
provided the essential components of the mechanism by which cells ensured equal
chromosome segregation to the two daughter cells a process fundamental
to genomic stability. This work formed the basis of the current model for how
the mitotic checkpoint regulates the activity of the anaphase-promoting complex
(see figure and
Milestone 20).
Magdalena Skipper, Associate Editor, Nature Reviews
Genetics
References
|
ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPERS
Hoyt,
M. A.,
Totis,
L. &
Roberts,
B. T.
S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in
response to loss of microtubule function.
Cell 66, 507-517 (1991) |
PubMed
|
|
 |
|
Li,
R. &
Murray,
A. W.
Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast.
Cell 66, 519-531 (1991) |
PubMed
|
|
 |
|